REVIEW 4 cited by
MemGuide: Intent-Driven Memory Selection for Goal-Oriented Multi-Session LLM Agents
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
MemGuide: Intent-Driven Memory Selection for Goal-Oriented Multi-Session LLM Agents
read the original abstract
Modern task-oriented dialogue (TOD) systems increasingly rely on large language model (LLM) agents, leveraging Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and long-context capabilities for long-term memory utilization. However, these methods are primarily based on semantic similarity, overlooking task intent and reducing task coherence in multi-session dialogues. To address this challenge, we introduce MemGuide, a two-stage framework for intent-driven memory selection. (1) Intent-Aligned Retrieval matches the current dialogue context with stored intent descriptions in the memory bank, retrieving QA-formatted memory units that share the same goal. (2) Missing-Slot Guided Filtering employs a chain-of-thought slot reasoner to enumerate unfilled slots, then uses a fine-tuned LLaMA-8B filter to re-rank the retrieved units by marginal slot-completion gain. The resulting memory units inform a proactive strategy that minimizes conversational turns by directly addressing information gaps. Based on this framework, we introduce the MS-TOD, the first multi-session TOD benchmark comprising 132 diverse personas, 956 task goals, and annotated intent-aligned memory targets, supporting efficient multi-session task completion. Evaluations on MS-TOD show that MemGuide raises the task success rate by 11% (88% -> 99%) and reduces dialogue length by 2.84 turns in multi-session settings, while maintaining parity with single-session benchmarks.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
MemLens: Benchmarking Multimodal Long-Term Memory in Large Vision-Language Models
MemLens benchmark shows long-context LVLMs lose accuracy with length while memory agents lose visual fidelity, with multi-session reasoning below 30% for most systems and neither approach solving the task alone.
-
MemFlow: Intent-Driven Memory Orchestration for Small Language Model Agents
MemFlow routes queries by intent to tiered memory operations, nearly doubling accuracy of a 1.7B SLM on long-horizon benchmarks compared to full-context baselines.
-
EvoMemBench: Benchmarking Agent Memory from a Self-Evolving Perspective
EvoMemBench evaluates 15 memory methods for LLM agents and finds long-context baselines competitive with no single memory approach working consistently across settings.
-
Back to Basics: Let Conversational Agents Remember with Just Retrieval and Generation
A minimalist retrieval-and-generation framework using turn isolation and query-driven pruning outperforms complex memory systems by directly addressing signal sparsity and dual-level redundancy in dialogues.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.