Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

AFaCTA: Assisting the Annotation of Factual Claim Detection with Reliable LLM Annotators

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.11073 v3 pith:7ILV56Z2 submitted 2024-02-16 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords factualclaimafactaannotationdetectionclaimsaddressdefinitions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the rise of generative AI, automated fact-checking methods to combat misinformation are becoming more and more important. However, factual claim detection, the first step in a fact-checking pipeline, suffers from two key issues that limit its scalability and generalizability: (1) inconsistency in definitions of the task and what a claim is, and (2) the high cost of manual annotation. To address (1), we review the definitions in related work and propose a unifying definition of factual claims that focuses on verifiability. To address (2), we introduce AFaCTA (Automatic Factual Claim deTection Annotator), a novel framework that assists in the annotation of factual claims with the help of large language models (LLMs). AFaCTA calibrates its annotation confidence with consistency along three predefined reasoning paths. Extensive evaluation and experiments in the domain of political speech reveal that AFaCTA can efficiently assist experts in annotating factual claims and training high-quality classifiers, and can work with or without expert supervision. Our analyses also result in PoliClaim, a comprehensive claim detection dataset spanning diverse political topics.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Sword and Shield: Uses and Strategies of LLMs in Navigating Disinformation

    cs.HC 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a 25-participant Werewolf-style game, all roles used an LLM chatbot strategically, as a sword for disinformation and a shield against it.

Pith tools