Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Reasoning before Comparison: LLM-Enhanced Semantic Similarity Metrics for Domain Specialized Text Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.11398 v2 pith:CGKKVPBL submitted 2024-02-17 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords similarityanalysismetricssemantictextframeworkspecializeddata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this study, we leverage LLM to enhance the semantic analysis and develop similarity metrics for texts, addressing the limitations of traditional unsupervised NLP metrics like ROUGE and BLEU. We develop a framework where LLMs such as GPT-4 are employed for zero-shot text identification and label generation for radiology reports, where the labels are then used as measurements for text similarity. By testing the proposed framework on the MIMIC data, we find that GPT-4 generated labels can significantly improve the semantic similarity assessment, with scores more closely aligned with clinical ground truth than traditional NLP metrics. Our work demonstrates the possibility of conducting semantic analysis of the text data using semi-quantitative reasoning results by the LLMs for highly specialized domains. While the framework is implemented for radiology report similarity analysis, its concept can be extended to other specialized domains as well.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 6 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Position: Towards a Responsible LLM-empowered Multi-Agent Systems

    cs.MA 2025-02 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    This position paper argues that responsible LLM-based multi-agent systems require quantifiable agreement metrics, system-level uncertainty quantification, and a human-centered dynamic moderator.

  2. From Divergence to Consensus: Evaluating the Role of Large Language Models in Facilitating Agreement through Adaptive Strategies

    cs.HC 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    In a 75-session pilot with two Greek students per session, ChatGPT 4.0 produced consensus proposals with higher average cosine similarity to initial participant opinions and required fewer iterations than Mistral Larg...

Pith tools