Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Mitigating Catastrophic Forgetting in Multi-domain Chinese Spelling Correction by Multi-stage Knowledge Transfer Framework

Computation and Language · Submitted 18 Feb 2024

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Experiments prove the effectiveness of our proposed method, and further analyses demonstrate the importance of overcoming catastrophic forgetting for improving the model performance.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2402.11422 (version 1)
Pith IDW7COIEJN, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationHai-Tao Zheng, Haojing Huang, Peng Xing, Shirong Ma, Wenhao Jiang, Xinnian Liang, Yangning Li, Yinghui Li, Ying Shen. "Mitigating Catastrophic Forgetting in Multi-domain Chinese Spelling Correction by Multi-stage Knowledge Transfer Framework." arXiv:2402.11422 (2024). https://pith.science/paper/W7COIEJN
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,908 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.95 · states limitation 0.12 · human participants 0.03 · controlled comparison 0.20 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.03 · compares with prior results 0.24 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Chinese Spelling Correction (CSC) aims to detect and correct spelling errors in given sentences. Recently, multi-domain CSC has gradually attracted the attention of researchers because it is more practicable. In this paper, we focus on the key flaw of the CSC model when adapting to multi-domain scenarios: the tendency to forget previously acquired knowledge upon learning new domain-specific knowledge (i.e., catastrophic forgetting). To address this, we propose a novel model-agnostic Multi-stage Knowledge Transfer (MKT) framework, which utilizes a continuously evolving teacher model for knowledge transfer in each domain, rather than focusing solely on new domain knowledge. It deserves to be mentioned that we are the first to apply continual learning methods to the multi-domain CSC task. Experiments prove the effectiveness of our proposed method, and further analyses demonstrate the importance of overcoming catastrophic forgetting for improving the model performance.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Chinese Spelling Correction (CSC) aims to detect and correct spelling errors in given sentences. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 Recently, multi-domain CSC has gradually attracted the attention of researchers because it is more practicable. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 0.98
s2 In this paper, we focus on the key flaw of the CSC model when adapting to multi-domain scenarios: the tendency to forget previously acquired knowledge upon learning new domain-specific knowledge (i.e., catastrophic forgetting). gap 0.61 0.18 0.06 asserted 0.98
s3 To address this, we propose a novel model-agnostic Multi-stage Knowledge Transfer (MKT) framework, which utilizes a continuously evolving teacher model for knowledge transfer in each domain, rather than focusing solely on new domain knowledge. method 0.75 0.87 0.13 asserted 1.00
s4 It deserves to be mentioned that we are the first to apply continual learning methods to the multi-domain CSC task. contribution 0.96 0.86 0.05 asserted 1.00
s5 Experiments prove the effectiveness of our proposed method, and further analyses demonstrate the importance of overcoming catastrophic forgetting for improving the model performance. result 0.92 0.96 0.82 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Chinese Spelling Correction (CSC) aims to detect and correct spelling errors in given sentences. Recently, multi-domain CSC has gradually attracted the attention of researchers because it is more practicable. In this paper, we focus on the key flaw of the CSC model when adapting to multi-domain scenarios: the tendency to forget previously acquired knowledge upon learning new domain-specific knowledge (i.e., catastrophic forgetting). To address this, we propose a novel model-agnostic Multi-stage Knowledge Transfer (MKT) framework, which utilizes a continuously evolving teacher model for knowledge transfer in each domain, rather than focusing solely on new domain knowledge. It deserves to be mentioned that we are the first to apply continual learning methods to the multi-domain CSC task. Experiments prove the effectiveness of our proposed method, and further analyses demonstrate the importance of overcoming catastrophic forgetting for improving the model performance.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites

Cites as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.