Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Self-AMPLIFY: Improving Small Language Models with Self Post Hoc Explanations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.12038 v3 pith:54WDDYVM submitted 2024-02-19 cs.LG cs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.CL
keywords self-amplifylanguagemodelsrationalesperformancepostexplanationgenerate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Incorporating natural language rationales in the prompt and In-Context Learning (ICL) have led to a significant improvement of Large Language Models (LLMs) performance. However, generating high-quality rationales require human-annotation or the use of auxiliary proxy models. In this work, we propose Self-AMPLIFY to automatically generate rationales from post hoc explanation methods applied to Small Language Models (SLMs) to improve their own performance. Self-AMPLIFY is a 3-step method that targets samples, generates rationales and builds a final prompt to leverage ICL. Self-AMPLIFY performance is evaluated on four SLMs and five datasets requiring strong reasoning abilities. Self-AMPLIFY achieves good results against competitors, leading to strong accuracy improvement. Self-AMPLIFY is the first method to apply post hoc explanation methods to autoregressive language models to generate rationales to improve their own performance in a fully automated manner.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Self-Critique and Refinement for Faithful Natural Language Explanations

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A self-critique and refinement framework with word-level feedback cuts unfaithfulness rates in LLM explanations by about 19 points on average, but gains may partly reflect the word-presence evaluation metric.

Pith tools