Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Can GNN be Good Adapter for LLMs?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.12984 v1 pith:424XTHUQ submitted 2024-02-20 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords llmsgraphadaptertagsadapternodetrainedcapabilitiescosts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently, large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated superior capabilities in understanding and zero-shot learning on textual data, promising significant advances for many text-related domains. In the graph domain, various real-world scenarios also involve textual data, where tasks and node features can be described by text. These text-attributed graphs (TAGs) have broad applications in social media, recommendation systems, etc. Thus, this paper explores how to utilize LLMs to model TAGs. Previous methods for TAG modeling are based on million-scale LMs. When scaled up to billion-scale LLMs, they face huge challenges in computational costs. Additionally, they also ignore the zero-shot inference capabilities of LLMs. Therefore, we propose GraphAdapter, which uses a graph neural network (GNN) as an efficient adapter in collaboration with LLMs to tackle TAGs. In terms of efficiency, the GNN adapter introduces only a few trainable parameters and can be trained with low computation costs. The entire framework is trained using auto-regression on node text (next token prediction). Once trained, GraphAdapter can be seamlessly fine-tuned with task-specific prompts for various downstream tasks. Through extensive experiments across multiple real-world TAGs, GraphAdapter based on Llama 2 gains an average improvement of approximately 5\% in terms of node classification. Furthermore, GraphAdapter can also adapt to other language models, including RoBERTa, GPT-2. The promising results demonstrate that GNNs can serve as effective adapters for LLMs in TAG modeling.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Attacking Graph Foundation Models Through Their Shared Representation

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A shared representation layer in graph foundation models is a distinct attack surface: input edits break three of six models and one spectral tokenizer is uniquely fragile.

  2. OpenRTAG: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Robust Text-Attributed Graph Learning under Data Quality Degradation

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    OpenRTAG is a benchmark that organizes text-attributed-graph data-quality issues into a 3x3 taxonomy (text/structure/label by sparsity/noise/imbalance) and evaluates model robustness across nine datasets and three tasks.

  3. Toward General and Robust LLM-enhanced Text-attributed Graph Learning

    cs.LG 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    UltraTAG organizes LLM-GNN methods for text-attributed graphs; UltraTAG-S adds LLM text propagation, augmentation, PageRank node selection, and edge reconfiguration to improve robustness on sparse data, with reported ...

Pith tools