Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Learning to Check: Unleashing Potentials for Self-Correction in Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.13035 v3 pith:U2IZCWGK submitted 2024-02-20 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords llmsself-correctioncheckcheckingformatmodelsself-checkingtasks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Self-correction has achieved impressive results in enhancing the style and security of the generated output from large language models (LLMs). However, recent studies suggest that self-correction might be limited or even counterproductive in reasoning tasks due to LLMs' difficulties in identifying logical mistakes. In this paper, we aim to enhance the self-checking capabilities of LLMs by constructing training data for checking tasks. Specifically, we apply the Chain of Thought (CoT) methodology to self-checking tasks, utilizing fine-grained step-level analyses and explanations to assess the correctness of reasoning paths. We propose a specialized checking format called "Step CoT Check". Following this format, we construct a checking-correction dataset that includes detailed step-by-step analysis and checking. Then we fine-tune LLMs to enhance their error detection and correction abilities. Our experiments demonstrate that fine-tuning with the "Step CoT Check" format significantly improves the self-checking and self-correction abilities of LLMs across multiple benchmarks. This approach outperforms other formats, especially in locating the incorrect position, with greater benefits observed in larger models. For reproducibility, all the datasets and code are provided in https://github.com/bammt/Learn-to-check.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Zoom-Refine: Boosting High-Resolution Multimodal Understanding via Localized Zoom and Self-Refinement

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A training-free two-step pipeline, localize a bounding box then refine the answer from a high-resolution crop, improves MLLM accuracy on high-resolution image benchmarks.

Pith tools