REVIEW 5 cited by
Copilot Evaluation Harness: Evaluating LLM-Guided Software Programming
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into Development Environments (IDEs) has become a focal point in modern software development. LLMs such as OpenAI GPT-3.5/4 and Code Llama offer the potential to significantly augment developer productivity by serving as intelligent, chat-driven programming assistants. However, utilizing LLMs out of the box is unlikely to be optimal for any given scenario. Rather, each system requires the LLM to be honed to its set of heuristics to ensure the best performance. In this paper, we introduce the Copilot evaluation harness: a set of data and tools for evaluating LLM-guided IDE interactions, covering various programming scenarios and languages. We propose our metrics as a more robust and information-dense evaluation than previous state of the art evaluation systems. We design and compute both static and execution based success metrics for scenarios encompassing a wide range of developer tasks, including code generation from natural language (generate), documentation generation from code (doc), test case generation (test), bug-fixing (fix), and workspace understanding and query resolution (workspace). These success metrics are designed to evaluate the performance of LLMs within a given IDE and its respective parameter space. Our learnings from evaluating three common LLMs using these metrics can inform the development and validation of future scenarios in LLM guided IDEs.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
Impossible to hide secret ...: Uncovering Security and Privacy Issues in LLM-native IDEs
A taxonomy of 32 security and privacy issues in LLM-native IDEs derived from 446 verified Reddit posts, showing most reported problems are system-level design flaws rather than LLM failures.
-
Think-Before-Speak: From Internal Evaluation to Public Expression in Multi-Agent Social Simulation
TBS is an interval-based multi-agent framework that separates private internal-state updates (dissonance appraisal, opinion climate, isolation risk, response strategy, willingness to speak) from public utterance selec...
-
Think-Before-Speak: From Internal Evaluation to Public Expression in Multi-Agent Social Simulation
TBS is an interval-based multi-agent LLM simulation framework that separates structured internal evaluative states from public utterance generation and shows these states vary systematically with turn-allocation, sile...
-
OjaKV: Context-Aware Online Low-Rank KV Cache Compression
OjaKV introduces hybrid full-rank storage for key tokens combined with online low-rank KV cache compression via Oja's algorithm to support memory-efficient long-context LLM inference.
-
CodeGrad: Integrating Multi-Step Verification with Gradient-Based LLM Refinement
CodeGrad improves code generation by routing structured critic feedback into up to two refinement rounds, but its formal-verification claim rests on AI-written proofs judged by the AI.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.