Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

CHATATC: Large Language Model-Driven Conversational Agents for Supporting Strategic Air Traffic Flow Management

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.14850 v2 pith:WKIKWJQX submitted 2024-02-20 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords chatatclargetoolscapabilitieschatgptconversationalflowgenerative
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLMs) have gained rapid popularity through publicly available tools such as ChatGPT. The adoption of LLMs for personal and professional use is fueled by the natural interactions between human users and computer applications such as ChatGPT, along with powerful summarization and text generation capabilities. Given the widespread use of such generative AI tools, in this work we investigate how these tools can be deployed in a non-safety critical, strategic traffic flow management setting. Specifically, we train an LLM, CHATATC, based on a large historical data set of Ground Delay Program (GDP) issuances, spanning 2000-2023 and consisting of over 80,000 GDP implementations, revisions, and cancellations. We test the query and response capabilities of CHATATC, documenting successes (e.g., providing correct GDP rates, durations, and reason) and shortcomings (e.g,. superlative questions). We also detail the design of a graphical user interface for future users to interact and collaborate with the CHATATC conversational agent.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Do ATCOs Need Explanations, and Why? Towards ATCO-Centered Explainable AI for Conflict Resolution Advisories

    cs.HC 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Air traffic controllers in this interview study wanted AI explanations mainly for documentation and stakeholder communication, and rarely when they already agreed with the AI's advice.

  2. LLM4Delay: Flight Delay Prediction via Cross-Modality Adaptation of Large Language Models and Aircraft Trajectory Representation

    cs.LG 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    LLM4Delay improves flight delay prediction accuracy by using instance-level projection to adapt LLMs for integrating textual aeronautical information with multiple aircraft trajectories.

Pith tools