Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Safety Optimized Reinforcement Learning via Multi-Objective Policy Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.15197 v1 pith:LOPRAVHX submitted 2024-02-23 eess.SY cs.AIcs.LGcs.ROcs.SY

classification eess.SYcs.AIcs.LGcs.ROcs.SY
keywords safetypolicysafesorloptimalityalgorithmoptimizedalgorithms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Safe reinforcement learning (Safe RL) refers to a class of techniques that aim to prevent RL algorithms from violating constraints in the process of decision-making and exploration during trial and error. In this paper, a novel model-free Safe RL algorithm, formulated based on the multi-objective policy optimization framework is introduced where the policy is optimized towards optimality and safety, simultaneously. The optimality is achieved by the environment reward function that is subsequently shaped using a safety critic. The advantage of the Safety Optimized RL (SORL) algorithm compared to the traditional Safe RL algorithms is that it omits the need to constrain the policy search space. This allows SORL to find a natural tradeoff between safety and optimality without compromising the performance in terms of either safety or optimality due to strict search space constraints. Through our theoretical analysis of SORL, we propose a condition for SORL's converged policy to guarantee safety and then use it to introduce an aggressiveness parameter that allows for fine-tuning the mentioned tradeoff. The experimental results obtained in seven different robotic environments indicate a considerable reduction in the number of safety violations along with higher, or competitive, policy returns, in comparison to six different state-of-the-art Safe RL methods. The results demonstrate the significant superiority of the proposed SORL algorithm in safety-critical applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Q-learning-based Model-free Safety Filter

    cs.RO 2024-11 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    A Q-learning safety filter with a time-dependent reward blocks unsafe actions from arbitrary task policies, but its theoretical guarantee is not valid as written.

Pith tools