REVIEW 9 cited by
Large Language Model for Participatory Urban Planning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Large Language Model for Participatory Urban Planning
read the original abstract
Participatory urban planning is the mainstream of modern urban planning that involves the active engagement of residents. However, the traditional participatory paradigm requires experienced planning experts and is often time-consuming and costly. Fortunately, the emerging Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown considerable ability to simulate human-like agents, which can be used to emulate the participatory process easily. In this work, we introduce an LLM-based multi-agent collaboration framework for participatory urban planning, which can generate land-use plans for urban regions considering the diverse needs of residents. Specifically, we construct LLM agents to simulate a planner and thousands of residents with diverse profiles and backgrounds. We first ask the planner to carry out an initial land-use plan. To deal with the different facilities needs of residents, we initiate a discussion among the residents in each community about the plan, where residents provide feedback based on their profiles. Furthermore, to improve the efficiency of discussion, we adopt a fishbowl discussion mechanism, where part of the residents discuss and the rest of them act as listeners in each round. Finally, we let the planner modify the plan based on residents' feedback. We deploy our method on two real-world regions in Beijing. Experiments show that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance in residents satisfaction and inclusion metrics, and also outperforms human experts in terms of service accessibility and ecology metrics.
Forward citations
Cited by 9 Pith papers
-
ErrorRadar: Benchmarking Complex Mathematical Reasoning of Multimodal Large Language Models Via Error Detection
ErrorRadar is a new benchmark of 2,500 multimodal K-12 math problems for MLLM error step identification and categorization, where GPT-4o trails human experts by ~10%.
-
When Agents Go Rogue: Activation-Based Detection of Malicious Behaviors in Multi-Agent Systems
Activation-space divergence detects and corrects compromised LLM agents in multi-agent systems without interaction graphs or synchronized rounds, outperforming graph baselines especially under async stealthy attacks.
-
From Symbolic to Geometric: Enabling Spatial Reasoning in Large Language Models
SLM adds a dedicated spatial modality and training dataset to LLMs, enabling geometric spatial reasoning and outperforming prompt-based symbolic methods on the new SpatialEval benchmark.
-
StreetDesignAI: Broadening Designer Perspectives Through Multi-Persona Evaluation of Cycling Infrastructure
StreetDesignAI provides structured multi-persona feedback on cycling designs and a user study shows it broadens designers' grasp of diverse cyclist perspectives and improves design decision confidence.
-
StreetDesignAI: Broadening Designer Perspectives Through Multi-Persona Evaluation of Cycling Infrastructure
StreetDesignAI uses multi-persona AI feedback to help designers identify and resolve experiential conflicts in cycling infrastructure through structured evaluation and iterative modification.
-
Adapt to Thrive! Adaptive Power-Mean Policy Optimization for Improved LLM Reasoning
APMPO boosts average Pass@1 scores on math reasoning benchmarks by 3 points over GRPO by using an adaptive power-mean policy objective and feedback-driven clipping bounds in RLVR training.
-
Free Energy-Driven Reinforcement Learning with Adaptive Advantage Shaping for Unsupervised Reasoning in LLMs
FREIA applies free energy principles and adaptive advantage shaping to unsupervised RL, outperforming baselines by 0.5-3.5 Pass@1 points on math reasoning with a 1.5B model.
-
Earth Science Foundation Models: From Perception to Reasoning and Discovery
The paper delivers a unified review and roadmap of Earth science foundation models, structured by capability depth from perception to agentic reasoning and by application breadth across atmosphere, hydrosphere, lithos...
-
Earth Science Foundation Models: From Perception to Reasoning and Discovery
A review of Earth science foundation models covering capability evolution from perception to discovery, applications across atmosphere/hydrosphere/lithosphere/biosphere/anthroposphere/cryosphere, over 200 datasets, an...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.