Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

RIME: Robust Preference-based Reinforcement Learning with Noisy Preferences

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.17257 v4 pith:MWMMPJ4D submitted 2024-02-27 cs.LG cs.AIcs.RO

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.RO
keywords pbrlrewardrimelearningpreferencesrobustmethodnoisy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Preference-based Reinforcement Learning (PbRL) circumvents the need for reward engineering by harnessing human preferences as the reward signal. However, current PbRL methods excessively depend on high-quality feedback from domain experts, which results in a lack of robustness. In this paper, we present RIME, a robust PbRL algorithm for effective reward learning from noisy preferences. Our method utilizes a sample selection-based discriminator to dynamically filter out noise and ensure robust training. To counteract the cumulative error stemming from incorrect selection, we suggest a warm start for the reward model, which additionally bridges the performance gap during the transition from pre-training to online training in PbRL. Our experiments on robotic manipulation and locomotion tasks demonstrate that RIME significantly enhances the robustness of the state-of-the-art PbRL method. Code is available at https://github.com/CJReinforce/RIME_ICML2024.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Internal Pluralism and the Limits of Pairwise Comparisons

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Under internal pluralism, forced local pairwise comparisons erase inseparable priorities and distort conflicted answers, while allowing indecision reports can sharply reduce queries needed to learn preference weights.

  2. CLARIFY: Contrastive Preference Reinforcement Learning for Untangling Ambiguous Queries

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    CLARIFY uses contrastive learning on preference data to embed trajectories, then rejection-samples queries that humans can distinguish clearly, improving offline preference-based RL.

Pith tools