REVIEW 2 cited by
Adversarial Math Word Problem Generation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have significantly transformed the educational landscape. As current plagiarism detection tools struggle to keep pace with LLMs' rapid advancements, the educational community faces the challenge of assessing students' true problem-solving abilities in the presence of LLMs. In this work, we explore a new paradigm for ensuring fair evaluation -- generating adversarial examples which preserve the structure and difficulty of the original questions aimed for assessment, but are unsolvable by LLMs. Focusing on the domain of math word problems, we leverage abstract syntax trees to structurally generate adversarial examples that cause LLMs to produce incorrect answers by simply editing the numeric values in the problems. We conduct experiments on various open- and closed-source LLMs, quantitatively and qualitatively demonstrating that our method significantly degrades their math problem-solving ability. We identify shared vulnerabilities among LLMs and propose a cost-effective approach to attack high-cost models. Additionally, we conduct automatic analysis to investigate the cause of failure, providing further insights into the limitations of LLMs.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Fostering Appropriate Reliance on Large Language Models: The Role of Explanations, Sources, and Inconsistencies
Explanations increase user reliance on both correct and incorrect LLM answers, while sources and inconsistent explanations reduce overreliance on incorrect answers in a controlled experiment.
-
Knowledge Augmented Complex Problem Solving with Large Language Models: A Survey
A survey that organizes LLM-based complex problem solving into three components, multi-step reasoning, domain knowledge, and result verification, and reviews methods and challenges across four application domains.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.