Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Adversarial Math Word Problem Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.17916 v3 pith:HSIB4U73 submitted 2024-02-27 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords llmsadversarialmathcauseconducteducationalexamplesmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have significantly transformed the educational landscape. As current plagiarism detection tools struggle to keep pace with LLMs' rapid advancements, the educational community faces the challenge of assessing students' true problem-solving abilities in the presence of LLMs. In this work, we explore a new paradigm for ensuring fair evaluation -- generating adversarial examples which preserve the structure and difficulty of the original questions aimed for assessment, but are unsolvable by LLMs. Focusing on the domain of math word problems, we leverage abstract syntax trees to structurally generate adversarial examples that cause LLMs to produce incorrect answers by simply editing the numeric values in the problems. We conduct experiments on various open- and closed-source LLMs, quantitatively and qualitatively demonstrating that our method significantly degrades their math problem-solving ability. We identify shared vulnerabilities among LLMs and propose a cost-effective approach to attack high-cost models. Additionally, we conduct automatic analysis to investigate the cause of failure, providing further insights into the limitations of LLMs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fostering Appropriate Reliance on Large Language Models: The Role of Explanations, Sources, and Inconsistencies

    cs.HC 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Explanations increase user reliance on both correct and incorrect LLM answers, while sources and inconsistent explanations reduce overreliance on incorrect answers in a controlled experiment.

  2. Knowledge Augmented Complex Problem Solving with Large Language Models: A Survey

    cs.LG 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey that organizes LLM-based complex problem solving into three components, multi-step reasoning, domain knowledge, and result verification, and reviews methods and challenges across four application domains.

Pith tools