Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 cited by

Learning to Generate Instruction Tuning Datasets for Zero-Shot Task Adaptation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.18334 v3 pith:F23JJOJU submitted 2024-02-28 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords instructionbonitotaskdatasetslanguagetuningmodelsdataset
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce Bonito, an open-source model for conditional task generation that converts unannotated text into task-specific training datasets for instruction tuning. We aim to enable zero-shot task adaptation of large language models on users' specialized, private data. We train Bonito by fine-tuning a pretrained large language model on a new large-scale dataset with 1.65M examples created by remixing existing instruction tuning datasets into meta-templates. The meta-templates for a dataset produce training examples where the input is the unannotated text and the task attribute and the output consists of the instruction and the response. We use Bonito to generate synthetic tasks for seven datasets from specialized domains with unannotated text across three task types -- yes-no question answering, extractive question answering, and natural language inference -- and adapt language models. We show that Bonito significantly improves the average performance of pretrained and instruction tuned models over the de facto self supervised baseline. For example, adapting Mistral-Instruct-v2 and instruction tuned variants of Mistral and Llama2 with Bonito improves the strong zero-shot performance by 22.1 F1 points whereas the next word prediction objective undoes some of the benefits of instruction tuning and reduces the average performance by 0.8 F1 points. We conduct additional experiments with Bonito to understand the effects of the domain, the size of the training set, and the choice of alternative synthetic task generators. Overall, we show that learning with synthetic instruction tuning datasets is an effective way to adapt language models to new domains. The model, dataset, and code are available at https://github.com/BatsResearch/bonito.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 6 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. HSS-Synth: Humanities and Social Sciences Data Synthesis for LLMs

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    HSS-Synth generates 230k instruction-tuning samples for 14 humanities/social-science fields and reports state-of-the-art fine-tuning results on 16 benchmarks.

  2. Language Models Need Sleep: Learning to Self-Modify and Consolidate Memories

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Sleep-time Knowledge Seeding plus Dreaming lets LLMs expand capacity, distill fragile in-context memories into stable parameters, and self-improve without human labels.

  3. Cartridges: Lightweight and general-purpose long context representations via self-study

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A per-corpus trained KV cache, called a Cartridge, matches full-context in-context learning quality on long-document benchmarks while using up to 38.6x less serving memory.

  4. Error-driven Data-efficient Large Multimodal Model Tuning

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An error-driven teacher-student pipeline extracts a student LMM's missing skills from validation mistakes and retrieves targeted samples from a task-agnostic dataset to fine-tune it.

  5. Efficient Knowledge Injection in LLMs via Self-Distillation

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Self-distillation from a model's own in-context answers injects factual knowledge into LLM weights more efficiently than supervised fine-tuning and is competitive with RAG.

  6. Software Engineering for Large Language Models: Research Status, Challenges and the Road Ahead

    cs.SE 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A literature review organizes LLM development into a six-phase software engineering lifecycle and identifies challenges and research directions for each phase.

Pith tools