REVIEW 6 cited by
A New Era in LLM Security: Exploring Security Concerns in Real-World LLM-based Systems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large Language Model (LLM) systems are inherently compositional, with individual LLM serving as the core foundation with additional layers of objects such as plugins, sandbox, and so on. Along with the great potential, there are also increasing concerns over the security of such probabilistic intelligent systems. However, existing studies on LLM security often focus on individual LLM, but without examining the ecosystem through the lens of LLM systems with other objects (e.g., Frontend, Webtool, Sandbox, and so on). In this paper, we systematically analyze the security of LLM systems, instead of focusing on the individual LLMs. To do so, we build on top of the information flow and formulate the security of LLM systems as constraints on the alignment of the information flow within LLM and between LLM and other objects. Based on this construction and the unique probabilistic nature of LLM, the attack surface of the LLM system can be decomposed into three key components: (1) multi-layer security analysis, (2) analysis of the existence of constraints, and (3) analysis of the robustness of these constraints. To ground this new attack surface, we propose a multi-layer and multi-step approach and apply it to the state-of-art LLM system, OpenAI GPT4. Our investigation exposes several security issues, not just within the LLM model itself but also in its integration with other components. We found that although the OpenAI GPT4 has designed numerous safety constraints to improve its safety features, these safety constraints are still vulnerable to attackers. To further demonstrate the real-world threats of our discovered vulnerabilities, we construct an end-to-end attack where an adversary can illicitly acquire the user's chat history, all without the need to manipulate the user's input or gain direct access to OpenAI GPT4. Our demo is in the link: https://fzwark.github.io/LLM-System-Attack-Demo/
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
Understanding the Supply Chain and Risks of Large Language Model Applications
A new benchmark dataset traces dependencies across 3,859 LLM applications, 109,211 models, 2,474 datasets, and 8,862 libraries, and finds widespread known vulnerabilities in application dependencies.
-
How Do You Choose Your AI Component? An Interview Study of Secure AI Integration in Practice
In interviews, 22 practitioners chose AI models primarily on functionality, cost, and trust in vendors, with security rarely a formal criterion, suggesting the industry is repeating early software supply chain mistakes.
-
Turning the Spell Around: Lightweight Alignment Amplification via Rank-One Safety Injection
ROSI bakes the refusal direction into a model's weight matrices via a rank-one update, raising refusal and jailbreak robustness with minimal measured utility cost.
-
SAFEFLOW: A Principled Protocol for Trustworthy and Transactional Autonomous Agent Systems
SAFEFLOW wraps LLM/VLM agents in fine-grained information-flow control, verifier-gated trust adjustment, and transactional concurrency, and its authors report near-perfect safety on their own benchmark plus AgentHarm,...
-
Prompt-in-Content Attacks: Exploiting Uploaded Inputs to Hijack LLM Behavior
Embedding a short 'system instruction' in a .docx file causes several commercial LLMs to refuse, substitute, redirect, or bias their output during summarization tasks.
-
A Survey on Model Extraction Attacks and Defenses for Large Language Models
A taxonomy of model extraction attacks and defenses for large language models, with proposed evaluation metrics and future research directions.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.