Pith. sign in

REVIEW

To Pool or Not To Pool: Analyzing the Regularizing Effects of Group-Fair Training on Shared Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.18803 v1 pith:5THBDGTI submitted 2024-02-29 cs.LG cs.CY

classification cs.LGcs.CY
keywords fairlearningboundsgroupgroup-specificgroupsmachinemodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In fair machine learning, one source of performance disparities between groups is over-fitting to groups with relatively few training samples. We derive group-specific bounds on the generalization error of welfare-centric fair machine learning that benefit from the larger sample size of the majority group. We do this by considering group-specific Rademacher averages over a restricted hypothesis class, which contains the family of models likely to perform well with respect to a fair learning objective (e.g., a power-mean). Our simulations demonstrate these bounds improve over a naive method, as expected by theory, with particularly significant improvement for smaller group sizes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools