Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

EyeGPT: Ophthalmic Assistant with Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.00840 v1 pith:KOPQXU63 submitted 2024-02-29 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords differenteyegptophthalmologycomprehensivediverseempathyevaluationincluding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has gained significant attention in healthcare consultation due to its potential to improve clinical workflow and enhance medical communication. However, owing to the complex nature of medical information, large language models (LLM) trained with general world knowledge might not possess the capability to tackle medical-related tasks at an expert level. Here, we introduce EyeGPT, a specialized LLM designed specifically for ophthalmology, using three optimization strategies including role-playing, finetuning, and retrieval-augmented generation. In particular, we proposed a comprehensive evaluation framework that encompasses a diverse dataset, covering various subspecialties of ophthalmology, different users, and diverse inquiry intents. Moreover, we considered multiple evaluation metrics, including accuracy, understandability, trustworthiness, empathy, and the proportion of hallucinations. By assessing the performance of different EyeGPT variants, we identify the most effective one, which exhibits comparable levels of understandability, trustworthiness, and empathy to human ophthalmologists (all Ps>0.05). Overall, ur study provides valuable insights for future research, facilitating comprehensive comparisons and evaluations of different strategies for developing specialized LLMs in ophthalmology. The potential benefits include enhancing the patient experience in eye care and optimizing ophthalmologists' services.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. BEnchmarking LLMs for Ophthalmology (BELO) for Ophthalmological Knowledge and Reasoning

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    BELO is a new ophthalmology benchmark of 900 expert-checked multiple-choice questions with reasoning, used to evaluate six LLMs on accuracy and explanation quality.

  2. GEMeX: A Large-Scale, Groundable, and Explainable Medical VQA Benchmark for Chest X-ray Diagnosis

    cs.CV 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GEMeX provides 1.6 million explainable, groundable chest X-ray VQA pairs across four question types and shows that current LVLMs perform poorly on it.

Pith tools