Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

MulCogBench: A Multi-modal Cognitive Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating Chinese and English Computational Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.01116 v1 pith:NR2FFG2G submitted 2024-03-02 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords languagemodelscognitivedatachineseenglishresultssimilarity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Pre-trained computational language models have recently made remarkable progress in harnessing the language abilities which were considered unique to humans. Their success has raised interest in whether these models represent and process language like humans. To answer this question, this paper proposes MulCogBench, a multi-modal cognitive benchmark dataset collected from native Chinese and English participants. It encompasses a variety of cognitive data, including subjective semantic ratings, eye-tracking, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and magnetoencephalography (MEG). To assess the relationship between language models and cognitive data, we conducted a similarity-encoding analysis which decodes cognitive data based on its pattern similarity with textual embeddings. Results show that language models share significant similarities with human cognitive data and the similarity patterns are modulated by the data modality and stimuli complexity. Specifically, context-aware models outperform context-independent models as language stimulus complexity increases. The shallow layers of context-aware models are better aligned with the high-temporal-resolution MEG signals whereas the deeper layers show more similarity with the high-spatial-resolution fMRI. These results indicate that language models have a delicate relationship with brain language representations. Moreover, the results between Chinese and English are highly consistent, suggesting the generalizability of these findings across languages.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Improving MLLM's Document Image Machine Translation via Synchronously Self-reviewing Its OCR Proficiency

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A fine-tuning paradigm that prompts MLLMs to self-generate OCR text before translating document images improves DIMT quality and reduces catastrophic forgetting of OCR.

  2. THiNK: Can Large Language Models Think-aloud?

    cs.CL 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    THiNK uses a multi-agent, feedback-driven loop of problem revision and GPT-4O-based Bloom's Taxonomy scoring to measure and improve higher-order thinking in LLMs on math word problems.

Pith tools