Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Automatic Question-Answer Generation for Long-Tail Knowledge

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.01382 v1 pith:GA43IL6S submitted 2024-03-03 cs.CL

Automatic Question-Answer Generation for Long-Tail Knowledge

classification cs.CL
keywords datasetsknowledgellmsentitieslong-tailtailansweringautomatic
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Pretrained Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained significant attention for addressing open-domain Question Answering (QA). While they exhibit high accuracy in answering questions related to common knowledge, LLMs encounter difficulties in learning about uncommon long-tail knowledge (tail entities). Since manually constructing QA datasets demands substantial human resources, the types of existing QA datasets are limited, leaving us with a scarcity of datasets to study the performance of LLMs on tail entities. In this paper, we propose an automatic approach to generate specialized QA datasets for tail entities and present the associated research challenges. We conduct extensive experiments by employing pretrained LLMs on our newly generated long-tail QA datasets, comparing their performance with and without external resources including Wikipedia and Wikidata knowledge graphs.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Empty Shelves or Lost Keys? Recall Is the Bottleneck for Parametric Factuality

    cs.CL 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0

    Frontier LLMs complete 95–98% of tested Wikipedia facts when given their original source context, but directly answer only about two-thirds to three-quarters of plain questions about those same facts — recall, not sto...