Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

EMOVOME: A Dataset for Emotion Recognition in Spontaneous Real-Life Speech

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.02167 v3 pith:FX7DF4G4 submitted 2024-03-04 eess.AS cs.AIcs.CLcs.SD

classification eess.AScs.AIcs.CLcs.SD
keywords emovomedatasetemotionresultsmodelsspeechactedannotators
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Spontaneous datasets for Speech Emotion Recognition (SER) are scarce and frequently derived from laboratory environments or staged scenarios, such as TV shows, limiting their application in real-world contexts. We developed and publicly released the Emotional Voice Messages (EMOVOME) dataset, including 999 voice messages from real conversations of 100 Spanish speakers on a messaging app, labeled in continuous and discrete emotions by expert and non-expert annotators. We evaluated speaker-independent SER models using acoustic features as baseline and transformer-based models. We compared the results with reference datasets including acted and elicited speech, and analyzed the influence of annotators and gender fairness. The pre-trained UniSpeech-SAT-Large model achieved the highest results, 61.64% and 55.57% Unweighted Accuracy (UA) for 3-class valence and arousal prediction respectively on EMOVOME, a 10% improvement over baseline models. For the emotion categories, 42.58% UA was obtained. EMOVOME performed lower than the acted RAVDESS dataset. The elicited IEMOCAP dataset also outperformed EMOVOME in predicting emotion categories, while similar results were obtained in valence and arousal. EMOVOME outcomes varied with annotator labels, showing better results and fairness when combining expert and non-expert annotations. This study highlights the gap between controlled and real-life scenarios, supporting further advancements in recognizing genuine emotions.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SpEmoC: A Balanced Speaker-Segment Multimodal Emotion Benchmark

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SpEmoC is a 30,000-clip, seven-emotion, video+audio+text benchmark from movies and TV, built to be class-balanced and split by movie so that minority emotions are harder to ignore.

  2. "How to Explore Biases in Speech Emotion AI with Users?" A Speech-Emotion-Acting Study Exploring Age and Language Biases

    cs.HC 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In a 24-person Danish study, a speech emotion recognition model showed no significant age or language differences in recognizing deliberately acted happy, sad, angry, and calm speech, though high-arousal emotions were...

  3. Improving Speech Emotion Recognition Through Cross Modal Attention Alignment and Balanced Stacking Model

    eess.AS 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A cross-modal attention ensemble with balanced stacking reaches MacroF1 0.4094 on 8-class naturalistic speech emotion recognition, beating the official baseline by about 0.08.

Pith tools