Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Learning to Maximize Mutual Information for Chain-of-Thought Distillation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.03348 v3 pith:PZYJJL65 submitted 2024-03-05 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords distillationinformationknowledgemethodmutualtaskschain-of-thoughtlearning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Knowledge distillation, the technique of transferring knowledge from large, complex models to smaller ones, marks a pivotal step towards efficient AI deployment. Distilling Step-by-Step~(DSS), a novel method utilizing chain-of-thought~(CoT) distillation, has demonstrated promise by imbuing smaller models with the superior reasoning capabilities of their larger counterparts. In DSS, the distilled model acquires the ability to generate rationales and predict labels concurrently through a multi-task learning framework. However, DSS overlooks the intrinsic relationship between the two training tasks, leading to ineffective integration of CoT knowledge with the task of label prediction. To this end, we investigate the mutual relationship of the two tasks from Information Bottleneck perspective and formulate it as maximizing the mutual information of the representation features of the two tasks. We propose a variational approach to solve this optimization problem using a learning-based method. Our experimental results across four datasets demonstrate that our method outperforms the state-of-the-art DSS. Our findings offer insightful guidance for future research on language model distillation as well as applications involving CoT. Codes are available at \url{https://github.com/xinchen9/cot_distillation_ACL2024}.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. What's on My Network? Using Large Language Models to Identify Real-World IoT Devices at Scale

    cs.LG 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An instruction-tuned LLaMA 3.1 8B model, trained on LLM-generated pseudo-labels, is claimed to identify IoT device vendors from passive network metadata with 98.25% top-1 accuracy across 2,015 vendors.

  2. Is Your Model Thinking or Just Stagnating? PUMA: Diagnosing Reasoning Pathology via Phase-Momentum Alignment

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    PUMA detects when a reasoning model's entropy drop aligns with hidden-state momentum, truncates at that point, and reports improved accuracy-efficiency on 1.5B-32B reasoning models.

  3. AgentDistill: Training-Free Agent Distillation with Generalizable MCP Boxes

    cs.AI 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    AgentDistill distills agent capabilities without any training by having a teacher generate reusable MCP tool boxes that small-model students invoke at inference time.

Pith tools