REVIEW 2 cited by
Maximally Extendable Sheaf Codes
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We study sheaf codes, a type of linear codes with a fixed hierarchical collection of local codes, viewed as a sheaf of vector spaces on a finite topological space we call coded space. Many existing codes, such as tensor product codes, Sipser-Spielman codes, and their more recent high-dimensional analogs, can be naturally represented as sheaf codes on simplicial and cubical complexes, considered as coded spaces. We introduce a new property of a sheaf code, called maximal extendibility, which ensures that within a class of codes on the same coded space, we encounter as few obstructions as possible when extending local sections globally. We show that in every class of sheaf codes defined on the same space and parameterized by parity-check matrices with polynomial entries, there always exists a maximally extendable sheaf code. Such codes are very interesting since it is possible to show that maximally extendable tensor product codes are good coboundary expanders, which potentially could be used to attack the qLTC conjecture.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Transversal non-Clifford gates on almost-good quantum LDPC and quantum locally testable codes
Almost-good qLDPC and qLTC codes admit nontrivial transversal logical multi-controlled-Z gates via cohomological cup products and two-way product-expanding punctured Reed–Solomon local codes.
-
Coupled-Layer Codes: Beyond Quantum Product Constructions
A new coupled-layer construction unifies quantum product codes with coupled-layer phases and produces non-CSS stabilizer codes, including X-cube, Chamon, fermionic toric code, and Walker-Wang examples.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.