Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

CLIP the Bias: How Useful is Balancing Data in Multimodal Learning?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.04547 v1 pith:YXHPJ6LI submitted 2024-03-07 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords databalancingbiasesclipimpactmultimodalrepresentationassociation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study the effectiveness of data-balancing for mitigating biases in contrastive language-image pretraining (CLIP), identifying areas of strength and limitation. First, we reaffirm prior conclusions that CLIP models can inadvertently absorb societal stereotypes. To counter this, we present a novel algorithm, called Multi-Modal Moment Matching (M4), designed to reduce both representation and association biases (i.e. in first- and second-order statistics) in multimodal data. We use M4 to conduct an in-depth analysis taking into account various factors, such as the model, representation, and data size. Our study also explores the dynamic nature of how CLIP learns and unlearns biases. In particular, we find that fine-tuning is effective in countering representation biases, though its impact diminishes for association biases. Also, data balancing has a mixed impact on quality: it tends to improve classification but can hurt retrieval. Interestingly, data and architectural improvements seem to mitigate the negative impact of data balancing on performance; e.g. applying M4 to SigLIP-B/16 with data quality filters improves COCO image-to-text retrieval @5 from 86% (without data balancing) to 87% and ImageNet 0-shot classification from 77% to 77.5%! Finally, we conclude with recommendations for improving the efficacy of data balancing in multimodal systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Debiasing CLIP: Interpreting and Correcting Bias in Attention Heads

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Using wrong/correct hard-sample head comparisons, LTC finds spurious CLIP attention heads and corrects them to raise worst-group accuracy on biased benchmarks.

  2. Hierarchical Pre-Training of Vision Encoders with Large Language Model

    cs.CV 2026-03 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A three-stage pre-training scheme that feeds multi-layer vision features into an LLM reports marginal benchmark gains, but lacks data, code, and ablations needed to support the claim.

Pith tools