Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Tuning transduction from hidden observables to optimize information harvesting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.04709 v1 pith:546KZHIW submitted 2024-03-07 cond-mat.stat-mech physics.bio-ph

classification cond-mat.stat-mechphysics.bio-ph
keywords informationtransductionbiologicaldofsharvestinglimitedobservablesonly
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Biological and living organisms sense and process information from their surroundings, typically having access only to a subset of external observables for a limited amount of time. In this work, we uncover how biological systems can exploit these accessible degrees of freedom (DOFs) to transduce information from the inaccessible ones with a limited energy budget. We find that optimal transduction strategies may boost information harvesting over the ideal case in which all DOFs are known, even when only finite-time trajectories are observed, at the price of higher dissipation. We apply our results to red blood cells, inferring the implemented transduction strategy from membrane flickering data and shedding light on the connection between mechanical stress and transduction efficiency. Our framework offers novel insights into the adaptive strategies of biological systems under non-equilibrium conditions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. STARN-GAT: A Multi-Modal Spatio-Temporal Graph Attention Network for Accident Severity Prediction

    cs.AI 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A graph-attention model for accident severity prediction reports 85% Macro F1 on FARS and 84% on ARI-BUET, but the FARS label distribution is inconsistent with the dataset's own description.

Pith tools