Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

ConstitutionalExperts: Training a Mixture of Principle-based Prompts

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.04894 v1 pith:TZ2XLSKA submitted 2024-03-07 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords prompttechniquesconstitutionalexpertsimprovesmethodothertraininggiven
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are highly capable at a variety of tasks given the right prompt, but writing one is still a difficult and tedious process. In this work, we introduce ConstitutionalExperts, a method for learning a prompt consisting of constitutional principles (i.e. rules), given a training dataset. Unlike prior methods that optimize the prompt as a single entity, our method incrementally improves the prompt by surgically editing individual principles. We also show that we can improve overall performance by learning unique prompts for different semantic regions of the training data and using a mixture-of-experts (MoE) architecture to route inputs at inference time. We compare our method to other state of the art prompt-optimization techniques across six benchmark datasets. We also investigate whether MoE improves these other techniques. Our results suggest that ConstitutionalExperts outperforms other prompt optimization techniques by 10.9% (F1) and that mixture-of-experts improves all techniques, suggesting its broad applicability.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Gensors: Authoring Personalized Visual Sensors with Multimodal Foundation Models and Reasoning

    cs.HC 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Gensors lets everyday users define personalized visual sensors by decomposing their sensing goal into testable criteria, and a user study shows improved perceived control and understanding over prompt-only authoring.

Pith tools