Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Online Contention Resolution Schemes for Network Revenue Management and Combinatorial Auctions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.05378 v2 pith:55OYLQTJ submitted 2024-03-08 cs.GT math.OC

classification cs.GTmath.OC
keywords ocrsonlinesubstitutionunderbenchmarkconstraintsproductsresource
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In the Network Revenue Management (NRM) problem, products composed of up to L resources are sold to stochastically arriving customers. We take a randomized rounding approach to NRM, motivated by the modern tool of Online Contention Resolution Schemes (OCRS). The goal is to take a fractional solution to NRM that satisfies the resource constraints in expectation, and implement it in an online policy that satisfies the resource constraints with probability 1, while (approximately) preserving all of the sales that were prescribed by the fractional solution. In NRM problems, customer substitution induces a negative correlation between products being demanded, making it difficult to apply the standard definition of OCRS. We start by deriving a more powerful notion of "random-element" OCRS that achieves a guarantee of 1/(1+L) for NRM with customer substitution, matching a common benchmark in the literature. We show this benchmark is unbeatable for all integers L that are the power of a prime number. We then show how to beat this benchmark under three widely applied assumptions. Finally, we show that under several assumptions, it is possible to do better than offline CRS when L>= 5. Our results have corresponding implications for Online Combinatorial Auctions, in which buyers bid for bundles of up to L items, and buyers being single-minded is akin to having no substitution. Our result under the assumption that products comprise one item from each of up to L groups implies that 1/(1+L) can be beaten for Prophet Inequality on the intersection of L partition matroids, a problem of interest. In sum, our paper shows how to apply OCRS to all of these problems and establishes a surprising separation in the achievable guarantees when substitution is involved, under general resource constraints parametrized by L.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Competitive Bundle Trading

    cs.DS 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    An online retailer buying and selling bundles with inventory caps can guarantee profit within O((1/epsilon) log(dv)) of the offline optimum, with matching lower bounds.

  2. A Black-Box Approach for Exogenous Replenishment in Online Resource Allocation

    cs.DS 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A black-box batching extension preserves the competitive ratio of any online resource allocation algorithm under exogenous replenishment, asymptotically when starting inventory is large, plus an impossibility result f...

  3. Constant-Factor Algorithms for Revenue Management with Consecutive Stays

    econ.TH 2025-06 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new algorithmic framework guarantees a fixed fraction (between 15% and 63%) of optimal online revenue for consecutive-stay seat and room allocation, with or without customer choice.

  4. Forward-backward Contention Resolution Schemes for Fair Rationing

    cs.DS 2025-02 accept novelty 7.0 of 10

    Forward-backward random order improves contention-resolution guarantees to 0.622 for single-unit and 1/3 for knapsack, with the single-unit guarantee proven tight.

Pith tools