REVIEW 3 cited by
Bayesian Preference Elicitation with Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Aligning AI systems to users' interests requires understanding and incorporating humans' complex values and preferences. Recently, language models (LMs) have been used to gather information about the preferences of human users. This preference data can be used to fine-tune or guide other LMs and/or AI systems. However, LMs have been shown to struggle with crucial aspects of preference learning: quantifying uncertainty, modeling human mental states, and asking informative questions. These challenges have been addressed in other areas of machine learning, such as Bayesian Optimal Experimental Design (BOED), which focus on designing informative queries within a well-defined feature space. But these methods, in turn, are difficult to scale and apply to real-world problems where simply identifying the relevant features can be difficult. We introduce OPEN (Optimal Preference Elicitation with Natural language) a framework that uses BOED to guide the choice of informative questions and an LM to extract features and translate abstract BOED queries into natural language questions. By combining the flexibility of LMs with the rigor of BOED, OPEN can optimize the informativity of queries while remaining adaptable to real-world domains. In user studies, we find that OPEN outperforms existing LM- and BOED-based methods for preference elicitation.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Interactive Task Alignment as a POMDP
Under ambiguous user requests, current LLMs recover the intended task only 22–32% of the time, well below human accuracy of 48%, and post-training only partially closes the gap.
-
Visual Persuasion: What Influences Decisions of Vision-Language Models?
Naturalistic edits to background, lighting, and staging systematically shift the choices of frontier vision-language models, and a new optimization-plus-interpretation framework (CVPO) discovers and explains the visua...
-
TO-GATE: Clarifying Questions and Summarizing Responses with Trajectory Optimization for Eliciting Human Preference
TO-GATE applies trajectory-level direct preference optimization with a weighted response loss to improve preference elicitation dialogues, claiming 83.15% win rate versus 73.83% for STaR-GATE.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.