Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Bayesian Preference Elicitation with Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.05534 v1 pith:M4CAHDV7 submitted 2024-03-08 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords preferenceboedlanguagebeenelicitationinformativeopenqueries
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Aligning AI systems to users' interests requires understanding and incorporating humans' complex values and preferences. Recently, language models (LMs) have been used to gather information about the preferences of human users. This preference data can be used to fine-tune or guide other LMs and/or AI systems. However, LMs have been shown to struggle with crucial aspects of preference learning: quantifying uncertainty, modeling human mental states, and asking informative questions. These challenges have been addressed in other areas of machine learning, such as Bayesian Optimal Experimental Design (BOED), which focus on designing informative queries within a well-defined feature space. But these methods, in turn, are difficult to scale and apply to real-world problems where simply identifying the relevant features can be difficult. We introduce OPEN (Optimal Preference Elicitation with Natural language) a framework that uses BOED to guide the choice of informative questions and an LM to extract features and translate abstract BOED queries into natural language questions. By combining the flexibility of LMs with the rigor of BOED, OPEN can optimize the informativity of queries while remaining adaptable to real-world domains. In user studies, we find that OPEN outperforms existing LM- and BOED-based methods for preference elicitation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Interactive Task Alignment as a POMDP

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Under ambiguous user requests, current LLMs recover the intended task only 22–32% of the time, well below human accuracy of 48%, and post-training only partially closes the gap.

  2. Visual Persuasion: What Influences Decisions of Vision-Language Models?

    cs.CV 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Naturalistic edits to background, lighting, and staging systematically shift the choices of frontier vision-language models, and a new optimization-plus-interpretation framework (CVPO) discovers and explains the visua...

  3. TO-GATE: Clarifying Questions and Summarizing Responses with Trajectory Optimization for Eliciting Human Preference

    cs.CL 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    TO-GATE applies trajectory-level direct preference optimization with a weighted response loss to improve preference elicitation dialogues, claiming 83.15% win rate versus 73.83% for STaR-GATE.

Pith tools