REVIEW 2 cited by
A Continued Pretrained LLM Approach for Automatic Medical Note Generation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
LLMs are revolutionizing NLP tasks. However, the use of the most advanced LLMs, such as GPT-4, is often prohibitively expensive for most specialized fields. We introduce HEAL, the first continuously trained 13B LLaMA2-based LLM that is purpose-built for medical conversations and measured on automated scribing. Our results demonstrate that HEAL outperforms GPT-4 and PMC-LLaMA in PubMedQA, with an accuracy of 78.4\%. It also achieves parity with GPT-4 in generating medical notes. Remarkably, HEAL surpasses GPT-4 and Med-PaLM 2 in identifying more correct medical concepts and exceeds the performance of human scribes and other comparable models in correctness and completeness.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
ChiMed 2.0: Advancing Chinese Medical Dataset in Facilitating Large Language Modeling
ChiMed 2.0 is a 204.4M-character Chinese medical dataset spanning pretraining, SFT, and preference data that yields small gains on CMMLU and CEval medical subsets.
-
Can LLM Improve for Expert Forecast Combination? Evidence from the European Central Bank Survey
A zero-shot LLM prompt beats equal-weighted averaging for one-year ECB SPF forecasts in one regression, but the result is fragile, the comparison is asymmetric, and no code or data are provided.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.