Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Rethinking Autoencoders for Medical Anomaly Detection from A Theoretical Perspective

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.09303 v3 pith:RKF7PDWX submitted 2024-03-14 cs.LG cs.CV

classification cs.LGcs.CV
keywords anomalydetectionmethodsreconstructionabnormalassumptionautoencodersdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Medical anomaly detection aims to identify abnormal findings using only normal training data, playing a crucial role in health screening and recognizing rare diseases. Reconstruction-based methods, particularly those utilizing autoencoders (AEs), are dominant in this field. They work under the assumption that AEs trained on only normal data cannot reconstruct unseen abnormal regions well, thereby enabling the anomaly detection based on reconstruction errors. However, this assumption does not always hold due to the mismatch between the reconstruction training objective and the anomaly detection task objective, rendering these methods theoretically unsound. This study focuses on providing a theoretical foundation for AE-based reconstruction methods in anomaly detection. By leveraging information theory, we elucidate the principles of these methods and reveal that the key to improving AE in anomaly detection lies in minimizing the information entropy of latent vectors. Experiments on four datasets with two image modalities validate the effectiveness of our theory. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first effort to theoretically clarify the principles and design philosophy of AE for anomaly detection. The code is available at \url{https://github.com/caiyu6666/AE4AD}.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Are Anomaly Scores Telling the Whole Story? A Benchmark for Multilevel Anomaly Detection

    cs.LG 2024-11 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MAD-Bench is a new benchmark for severity-aligned anomaly detection, and the paper finds MLLM-based scoring ranks severity better than conventional AD models.

Pith tools