pith. sign in

arxiv: 2403.10559 · v4 · submitted 2024-03-14 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.AI· cs.RO

Generative Models and Connected and Automated Vehicles: A Survey in Exploring the Intersection of Transportation and AI

Bo Shu , Yiting Zhang , Saisai Hu , Dong Shu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 02:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.AIcs.RO
keywords generative modelsconnected and automated vehiclesCAVsautonomous vehiclespredictive modelingsimulationAI in transportationdecision-making
0
0 comments X

The pith

Generative models can enhance predictive modeling, simulation accuracy, and decision-making in connected and automated vehicles.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This survey reviews the intersection of generative models and connected and automated vehicles to show how their integration could strengthen autonomous vehicle systems. It traces the history and current applications while identifying specific benefits such as improved predictions and more accurate simulations alongside integration challenges. A reader would care because the work maps concrete pathways toward safer and more innovative transportation through AI-driven data generation and modeling. The paper concludes by noting remaining obstacles and the scope for further progress in safety.

Core claim

By focusing on the application of generative models within the context of CAVs, the study aims to unravel how this integration could enhance predictive modeling, simulation accuracy, and decision-making processes in autonomous vehicles, while discussing the benefits and challenges of integration and the potential for advancements in safety and innovation.

What carries the argument

Survey of generative model applications to CAVs, centered on their use for predictive modeling, simulation, and decision processes.

Load-bearing premise

The reviewed literature on generative models and CAVs is sufficient to identify meaningful benefits and challenges in their integration without gaps in coverage or unstated technical barriers.

What would settle it

A follow-up review that identifies major unaddressed technical barriers preventing generative models from delivering measurable gains in CAV simulation accuracy or decision reliability.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2403.10559 by Bo Shu, Dong Shu, Saisai Hu, Yiting Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The figure shows the development history of the generative model [62], and Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) [63]. These models have found applications across various domains, including image and text generation, design, and simulation. The development of Generative Models began with founda￾tional work in AI and machine learning, including the LISP programming language in the 1960s, the ELIZA chatbot … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The figure shows the development history of the car safety global standards. This includes updates to road maintenance practices and the introduction of new funding models to sup￾port the necessary infrastructure upgrades without significantly impacting public budgets [3]. III. INTEGRATION OF GENERATIVE MODELS IN CAVS A. Integration in Real Life In the field of Connected Automated Vehicles (CAV), as Table … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This report investigates the history and impact of Generative Models and Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAVs), two groundbreaking forces pushing progress in technology and transportation. By focusing on the application of generative models within the context of CAVs, the study aims to unravel how this integration could enhance predictive modeling, simulation accuracy, and decision-making processes in autonomous vehicles. This thesis discusses the benefits and challenges of integrating generative models and CAV technology in transportation. It aims to highlight the progress made, the remaining obstacles, and the potential for advancements in safety and innovation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a survey reviewing the history and impact of generative models and connected and automated vehicles (CAVs). It focuses on their integration to improve predictive modeling, simulation accuracy, and decision-making processes in autonomous vehicles, while outlining benefits, challenges, progress made, remaining obstacles, and potential advancements in safety and innovation.

Significance. If the survey delivers a balanced and reasonably comprehensive synthesis of the relevant literature, it could serve as a helpful entry point for researchers working at the AI-transportation intersection by organizing existing work and flagging open issues. Its value rests entirely on the quality of the literature selection and the clarity of the thematic organization rather than on any new technical results.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central goal of identifying 'meaningful benefits and challenges' and 'unravel[ing] how this integration could enhance' predictive modeling etc. rests on an unstated assumption that the reviewed literature is sufficiently complete and representative; no search strategy, databases, keywords, or inclusion/exclusion criteria are supplied, making it impossible to assess coverage or potential gaps.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the text refers to both 'this report' and 'this thesis' in consecutive sentences; terminology should be made consistent throughout.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our survey manuscript. We address the single major comment below and will incorporate the suggested clarification in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central goal of identifying 'meaningful benefits and challenges' and 'unravel[ing] how this integration could enhance' predictive modeling etc. rests on an unstated assumption that the reviewed literature is sufficiently complete and representative; no search strategy, databases, keywords, or inclusion/exclusion criteria are supplied, making it impossible to assess coverage or potential gaps.

    Authors: We agree that explicitly documenting the literature search process strengthens the credibility of any survey and allows readers to better evaluate coverage. Although the current manuscript presents a narrative synthesis rather than a formal systematic review, the absence of a methods description is a valid limitation. In the revised manuscript we will insert a new subsection (likely under Introduction) that specifies the databases consulted (IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, Google Scholar, arXiv), the primary keyword combinations employed, the time window considered, and the inclusion/exclusion criteria applied. This addition will directly address the referee’s concern without altering the survey’s scope or conclusions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in literature survey synthesis

full rationale

This is a survey paper whose central claim is a synthesis of existing external literature on generative models in CAVs. It advances no original equations, predictions, fitted parameters, derivations, or uniqueness theorems. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-definition, fitted input renamed as prediction, or self-citation chain. The coverage assumption is definitional to any survey and does not create internal circularity. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a survey the paper introduces no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; its content rests on the selection and interpretation of existing publications.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5625 in / 968 out tokens · 19637 ms · 2026-05-24T02:46:51.418410+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

110 extracted references · 110 canonical work pages · 11 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Automated Vehicles for Safety — NHTSA,

    NHTSA, “Automated Vehicles for Safety — NHTSA,” www.nhtsa.gov. https://www.nhtsa.gov/vehicle-safety/automated-vehicles-safety

    work page

  2. [2]

    Autonomous driving’s future: Convenient and connected — McKinsey,

    McKinsey, “Autonomous driving’s future: Convenient and connected — McKinsey,” www.mckinsey.com, Jan. 06, 2023. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/automotive-and-assembly/our- insights/autonomous-drivings-future-convenient-and-connected

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    The 6 Challenges of Autonomous Vehicles and How to Overcome Them,

    R. McCauley, “The 6 Challenges of Autonomous Vehicles and How to Overcome Them,” Govtech.com, 2019. https://www.govtech.com/fs/The-6-Challenges-of-Autonomous- Vehicles-and-How-to-Overcome-Them.html

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    ”Robust prompt optimization for defending language models against jailbreaking attacks.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.17263 (2024)

    Zhou, Andy, Bo Li, and Haohan Wang. ”Robust prompt optimization for defending language models against jailbreaking attacks.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.17263 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    ”Assessing prompt injection risks in 200+ custom gpts.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.11538 (2023)

    Yu, Jiahao, et al. ”Assessing prompt injection risks in 200+ custom gpts.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.11538 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    ”AttackEval: How to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Jailbreak Attacking on Large Language Models.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.09002 (2024)

    Jin, Mingyu, et al. ”AttackEval: How to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Jailbreak Attacking on Large Language Models.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.09002 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Divya Saxena and Jiannong Cao. 2021. Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs): Challenges, Solutions, and Future Directions. ACM Comput. Surv. 54, 3, Article 63 (April 2022), 42 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3446374

    work page doi:10.1145/3446374 2021

  8. [8]

    H. Lin, Y . Liu, S. Li and X. Qu, ”How Generative Adversarial Networks Promote the Development of Intelligent Transportation Systems: A Survey,” in IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1781-1796, September 2023, doi: 10.1109/JAS.2023.123744

    work page doi:10.1109/jas.2023.123744 2023

  9. [9]

    Aradi, ”Survey of Deep Reinforcement Learning for Motion Plan- ning of Autonomous Vehicles,” in IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol

    S. Aradi, ”Survey of Deep Reinforcement Learning for Motion Plan- ning of Autonomous Vehicles,” in IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 740-759, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1109/TITS.2020.3024655

    work page doi:10.1109/tits.2020.3024655 2022

  10. [10]

    Alharin, T

    A. Alharin, T. -N. Doan and M. Sartipi, ”Reinforcement Learning Interpretation Methods: A Survey,” in IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 171058- 171077, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3023394

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2020.3023394 2020

  11. [11]

    Rishubh Parihar, Ankit Dhiman, Tejan Karmali, and Venkatesh R

    work page

  12. [12]

    In Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM ’22)

    Everything is There in Latent Space: Attribute Editing and Attribute Style Manipulation by StyleGAN Latent Space Exploration. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY , USA, 1828–1836. https://doi.org/10.1145/3503161.3547972

    work page doi:10.1145/3503161.3547972

  13. [13]

    Omer Tov, Yuval Alaluf, Yotam Nitzan, Or Patashnik, and Daniel Cohen- Or. 2021. Designing an encoder for StyleGAN image manipulation. ACM Trans. Graph. 40, 4, Article 133 (August 2021), 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450626.3459838

    work page doi:10.1145/3450626.3459838 2021

  14. [14]

    C. Hao et al., ”NAIS: Neural Architecture and Implementation Search and its Applications in Autonomous Driving,” 2019 IEEE/ACM Interna- tional Conference on Computer-Aided Design (ICCAD), Westminster, CO, USA, 2019, pp. 1-8, doi: 10.1109/ICCAD45719.2019.8942055

    work page doi:10.1109/iccad45719.2019.8942055 2019

  15. [15]

    Balazs and W

    G. Balazs and W. Stechele, ”Neural Architecture Search for Au- tomotive Grid Fusion Networks Under Embedded Hardware Con- straints,” 2020 19th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), Miami, FL, USA, 2020, pp. 79-86, doi: 10.1109/ICMLA51294.2020.00022

    work page doi:10.1109/icmla51294.2020.00022 2020

  16. [16]

    T. Zeng, O. Semiari, M. Chen, W. Saad and M. Bennis, ”Fed- erated Learning for Collaborative Controller Design of Connected and Autonomous Vehicles,” 2021 60th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), Austin, TX, USA, 2021, pp. 5033-5038, doi: 10.1109/CDC45484.2021.9683257

    work page doi:10.1109/cdc45484.2021.9683257 2021

  17. [17]

    Z. Xiao, J. Shu, H. Jiang, G. Min, J. Liang and A. Iyengar, ”Toward Collaborative Occlusion-free Perception in Connected Au- tonomous Vehicles,” in IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, doi: 10.1109/TMC.2023.3298643

    work page doi:10.1109/tmc.2023.3298643 2023

  18. [18]

    Julio C. S. Dos Anjos, Kassiano J. Matteussi, Fernanda C. Orlandi, Jorge L. V . Barbosa, Jorge S ´a Silva, Luiz F. Bittencourt, and Cl ´audio F. R. Geyer. 2023. A Survey on Collaborative Learning for Intelligent Autonomous Systems. ACM Comput. Surv. 56, 4, Article 98 (April 2024), 37 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3625544

    work page doi:10.1145/3625544 2023

  19. [19]

    ”Tensor trust: Interpretable prompt injection attacks from an online game.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.01011 (2023)

    Toyer, Sam, et al. ”Tensor trust: Interpretable prompt injection attacks from an online game.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.01011 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Jatmo: Prompt Injection Defense by Task-Specific Finetuning,

    Piet, Julien, et al. ”Jatmo: Prompt injection defense by task-specific finetuning.” arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.17673 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    10 Ways to Improve the Performance of Retrieval Augmented Generation Systems,

    M. Ambrogi, “10 Ways to Improve the Performance of Retrieval Augmented Generation Systems,” Medium, Sep. 18, 2023. https://towardsdatascience.com/10-ways-to-improve-the-performance- of-retrieval-augmented-generation-systems-5fa2cee7cd5c

    work page 2023

  22. [22]

    Muhammad, Khan, et al. ”Vision-based semantic segmentation in scene understanding for autonomous driving: Recent achievements, challenges, and outlooks.” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 23.12 (2022): 22694-22715

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    ”A context-aware pedestrian tra- jectory prediction framework for automated vehicles.” Transportation research part C: emerging technologies 134 (2022): 103453

    Kalatian, Arash, and Bilal Farooq. ”A context-aware pedestrian tra- jectory prediction framework for automated vehicles.” Transportation research part C: emerging technologies 134 (2022): 103453

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    Hang, Peng, et al. ”Decision making for connected automated vehicles at urban intersections considering social and individual benefits.” IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems 23.11 (2022): 22549- 22562

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    J., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S.,and Bengio, Y

    Goodfellow, I. J., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S.,and Bengio, Y . (2014). Generative adversarial nets. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 2672-2680)

    work page 2014

  26. [26]

    Antoniou, A., Storkey, A., and Edwards, H. (2017). Data augmentation generative adversarial networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.04340

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  27. [27]

    M., Schmidt-Erfurth, U., and Langs, G

    Schlegl, T., Seeb ¨ock, P., Waldstein, S. M., Schmidt-Erfurth, U., and Langs, G. (2017). Unsupervised anomaly detection with generative ad- versarial networks to guide marker discovery. In International conference on information processing in medical imaging (pp. 146-157). Springer, Cham

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    Salimans, T., Goodfellow, I., Zaremba, W., Cheung, V ., Radford, A., Chen, X., and Chen, Y . (2016). Improved techniques for training GANs. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 2234-2242)

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    Brock, A., Donahue, J., and Simonyan, K. (2019). Large scale GAN training for high fidelity natural image synthesis. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR)

    work page 2019

  30. [30]

    Creswell, A., White, T., Dumoulin, V ., Arulkumaran, K., Sengupta, B., and Bharath, A. A. (2018). Generative adversarial networks: An overview. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 35(1), 53-65

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    A., Veness, J., Belle- mare, M

    Mnih, V ., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Rusu, A. A., Veness, J., Belle- mare, M. G., and Petersen, S. (2015). Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature, 518(7540), 529-533

    work page 2015

  32. [32]

    Shalev-Shwartz, S., Shammah, S., and Shashua, A. (2016). Safe, multi- agent, reinforcement learning for autonomous driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.03295

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    Henderson, P., Islam, R., Bachman, P., Pineau, J., Precup, D.,and Meger, D. (2018). Deep reinforcement learning that matters. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (V ol. 32, No. 1)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Dulac-Arnold, G., Mankowitz, D., and Hester, T. (2019). Challenges of real-world reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.12901

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    Karras, T., Laine, S.,and Aila, T. (2019). A style-based generator architecture for generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 4401-4410)

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    Chesney, R., and Citron, D. K. (2019). Deep fakes: A looming challenge for privacy, democracy, and national security. California Law Review, 107, 1753

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    Zoph, B., and Le, Q. V . (2017). Neural architecture search with rein- forcement learning. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR)

    work page 2017

  38. [38]

    Tan, M., Chen, B., Pang, R., Vasudevan, V ., and Le, Q. V . (2019). Mnasnet: Platform-aware neural architecture search for mobile. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 2820-2828)

    work page 2019

  39. [39]

    H., and Hutter, F

    Elsken, T., Metzen, J. H., and Hutter, F. (2019). Neural architecture search: A survey. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 20(55), 1-21

    work page 2019

  40. [40]

    C., and Fuhrmann, D

    Shlezinger, N., Eldar, Y . C., and Fuhrmann, D. R. (2020). Model-based deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.08414

    work page arXiv 2020

  41. [41]

    Ran, C., Hu, X., Chen, Z., Sun, L., and Shi, J. (2019). Deep learning models for global collaborative autonomous driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.05481

    work page arXiv 2019

  42. [42]

    A., and Coen-Porisini, A

    Sicari, S., Rizzardi, A., Grieco, L. A., and Coen-Porisini, A. (2015). Security, privacy and trust in Internet of Things: The road ahead. Computer networks, 76, 146-164

    work page 2015

  43. [43]

    Sharma, V ., You, I., Kumar, R., Zeadally, S., and Qiu, M. (2020). Autonomous vehicles: Security, safety, and privacy issues. IEEE Access, 8, 193893-193902

    work page 2020

  44. [44]

    Muhammad Khan et al. (2022). Vision-based semantic segmentation in scene understanding for autonomous driving: Recent achievements, chal- lenges, and outlooks. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(12), 22694-22715

    work page 2022

  45. [45]

    Kalatian, A., and Farooq, B. (2022). A context-aware pedestrian tra- jectory prediction framework for automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 134, 103453

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Hang, P. et al. (2022). Decision making for connected automated vehicles at urban intersections considering social and individual benefits. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(11), 22549- 22562

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    Smith, J., Zhang, L.,and Gupta, A. (2021). ”VistaGPT: Generative Parallel Transformers for Vehicles with Intelligent Systems for Transport Automation.” Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Technology, 19(4), 345-360

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    Johnson, M., Smith, R., & Gupta, A. (2021). ”A Systematic Solution for Human Driving Behavior Modeling and Simulation in Automated Vehicle Studies.” Journal of Advanced Transportation Systems, 35(3), 567-582

    work page 2021

  49. [49]

    A., & Johnson, D

    Smith, J. A., & Johnson, D. B. (2020). ”Enhancing CA Vs Commu- nication with 5G and DSRC Integration.” Journal of Transport and Communication Innovation, 18(2), 34-49

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    T., & Lee, A

    Johnson, R. T., & Lee, A. H. (2021). ”Sensor Fusion and Wireless Tech- nologies: Accelerating the Future of Autonomous Driving.” Automotive Engineering Review, 29(4), 567-580

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    Williams, J., Patel, K., & Thompson, L. (2021). ”On the Integration of Enabling Wireless Technologies and Sensor Fusion for Next-Generation Connected and Autonomous Vehicles.” International Journal of Auto- motive Technology, 22(5), 1233-1245

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    K., & Kumar, V

    Patel, S. K., & Kumar, V . (2022). ”Advancing Urban Mobility with V2X Communication in Smart Cities.” Smart Transportation Systems, 6(1), 88-102

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    Greenwood, D., Park, J., & Suh, Y . (2022). ”Safe Model-Based Off- Policy Reinforcement Learning for Eco-Driving in Connected and Automated Hybrid Electric Vehicles.”

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    Nguyen, T., Lee, H., & Kim, D

    Journal of Sustainable Mobility, 9(3), 455-470. Nguyen, T., Lee, H., & Kim, D. (2022). ”Enhancing Eco-Driving in Urban CA V-HEVs Through Advanced Reinforcement Learning Strategies.” Environmental Technology & Innovation, 24, 101783

    work page 2022

  55. [55]

    ”Re- current conditional generative adversarial networks for autonomous driving sensor modelling.” 2019 IEEE Intelligent transportation systems conference (ITSC)

    Arnelid, Henrik, Edvin Listo Zec, and Nasser Mohammadiha. ”Re- current conditional generative adversarial networks for autonomous driving sensor modelling.” 2019 IEEE Intelligent transportation systems conference (ITSC). IEEE, 2019

    work page 2019

  56. [56]

    Guarnera, Luca, Oliver Giudice, and Sebastiano Battiato. ”Mastering Deepfake Detection: A Cutting-Edge Approach to Distinguish GAN and Diffusion-Model Images.” ACM Transactions on Multimedia Comput- ing, Communications and Applications (2024)

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    ”New challenges and future perspectives in cognitive neuroscience.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 18: 1390788

    Frantzidis, Christos A., et al. ”New challenges and future perspectives in cognitive neuroscience.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 18: 1390788

    work page

  58. [58]

    ”A generative policy model for connected and autonomous vehicles.” 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC)

    Cunnington, Daniel, et al. ”A generative policy model for connected and autonomous vehicles.” 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC). IEEE, 2019

    work page 2019

  59. [59]

    Autonomous navigation of a rotary wing flying vehicles for precision agriculture

    Mokrane, Adel. Autonomous navigation of a rotary wing flying vehicles for precision agriculture. Diss. Universit ´e Paris-Saclay; Universit´e Abou Bekr Belkaid (Tlemcen, Alg ´erie), 2023

    work page 2023

  60. [60]

    ”Privacy on-demand and Security preserving Federated Gen- erative Networks or Models.”

    Jobs, All. ”Privacy on-demand and Security preserving Federated Gen- erative Networks or Models.”

    work page

  61. [61]

    ”A tutorial on learning with Bayesian networks.” Innovations in Bayesian networks: Theory and applications (2008): 33- 82

    Heckerman, David. ”A tutorial on learning with Bayesian networks.” Innovations in Bayesian networks: Theory and applications (2008): 33- 82

    work page 2008

  62. [62]

    ”Recent advances in convolutional neural networks.” Pattern recognition 77 (2018): 354-377

    Gu, Jiuxiang, et al. ”Recent advances in convolutional neural networks.” Pattern recognition 77 (2018): 354-377

    work page 2018

  63. [63]

    Schuster, Mike, and Kuldip K. Paliwal. ”Bidirectional recurrent neural networks.” IEEE transactions on Signal Processing 45.11 (1997): 2673- 2681

    work page 1997

  64. [64]

    ”Generative adversarial nets.” Advances in neural information processing systems 27 (2014)

    Goodfellow, Ian, et al. ”Generative adversarial nets.” Advances in neural information processing systems 27 (2014)

    work page 2014

  65. [65]

    ”From Eliza to Xi- aoIce: challenges and opportunities with social chatbots.” Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering 19 (2018): 10-26

    Shum, Heung-Yeung, Xiao-dong He, and Di Li. ”From Eliza to Xi- aoIce: challenges and opportunities with social chatbots.” Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering 19 (2018): 10-26

    work page 2018

  66. [66]

    Feigenbaum

    Buchanan, Bruce G., and Edward A. Feigenbaum. ”DENDRAL and Meta-DENDRAL: Their applications dimension.” Artificial intelligence 11.1-2 (1978): 5-24

    work page 1978

  67. [67]

    Computer-based medical consultations: MYCIN

    Shortliffe, Edward, ed. Computer-based medical consultations: MYCIN. V ol. 2. Elsevier, 2012

    work page 2012

  68. [68]

    ”Search-based procedural content generation: A taxonomy and survey.” IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games 3.3 (2011): 172-186

    Togelius, Julian, et al. ”Search-based procedural content generation: A taxonomy and survey.” IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games 3.3 (2011): 172-186

    work page 2011

  69. [69]

    ”Art and the science of generative AI.” Science 380.6650 (2023): 1110-1111

    Epstein, Ziv, et al. ”Art and the science of generative AI.” Science 380.6650 (2023): 1110-1111

    work page 2023

  70. [70]

    Cavnar, William B., and John M. Trenkle. ”N-gram-based text cat- egorization.” Proceedings of SDAIR-94, 3rd annual symposium on document analysis and information retrieval. V ol. 161175. 1994

    work page 1994

  71. [71]

    ”Attention is all you need.” Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017)

    Vaswani, Ashish, et al. ”Attention is all you need.” Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017)

    work page 2017

  72. [72]

    ”Stylenet: Generating attractive visual captions with styles.” Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Gan, Chuang, et al. ”Stylenet: Generating attractive visual captions with styles.” Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2017

    work page 2017

  73. [73]

    BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding

    Devlin, Jacob, et al. ”Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional trans- formers for language understanding.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805 (2018)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  74. [74]

    ”Language models are unsupervised multitask learners.” OpenAI blog 1.8 (2019): 9

    Radford, Alec, et al. ”Language models are unsupervised multitask learners.” OpenAI blog 1.8 (2019): 9

    work page 2019

  75. [75]

    VisualBERT: A Simple and Performant Baseline for Vision and Language

    Li, Liunian Harold, et al. ”Visualbert: A simple and performant baseline for vision and language.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.03557 (2019)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1908

  76. [76]

    ”GPT-3: Its nature, scope, limits, and consequences.” Minds and Machines 30 (2020): 681-694

    Floridi, Luciano, and Massimo Chiriatti. ”GPT-3: Its nature, scope, limits, and consequences.” Minds and Machines 30 (2020): 681-694

    work page 2020

  77. [77]

    The Ethical Implications of DALL-E: Opportunities and Challenges

    Zhou, Nabus. The Ethical Implications of DALL-E: Opportunities and Challenges. 2023. The Ethical Implications of DALL-E: Opportunities and Challenges

    work page 2023

  78. [78]

    GPT-4 Technical Report

    GPT-4 Technical Report. arXiv:2303.08774. 2023. GPT-4 Technical Report

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  79. [79]

    Sora: A Review on Background, Technology, Limitations, and Opportunities of Large Vision Models

    ”Sora: A Review on Background, Technology, Limitations, and Oppor- tunities of Large Vision Models.” arXiv:2402.17177. Sora: A Review on Background, Technology, Limitations, and Opportunities of Large Vision Models

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  80. [80]

    ChatGPT: A Case Study on Copyright Challenges for Generative Artificial Intelligence Systems

    Lucchi N. ChatGPT: A Case Study on Copyright Challenges for Generative Artificial Intelligence Systems. European Journal of Risk Regulation. Published online 2023:1-23. doi:10.1017/err.2023.59

    work page doi:10.1017/err.2023.59 2023

Showing first 80 references.