Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

A Practical Guide to Sample-based Statistical Distances for Evaluating Generative Models in Science

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.12636 v2 pith:MVD3CZRT submitted 2024-03-19 cs.LG stat.ML

A Practical Guide to Sample-based Statistical Distances for Evaluating Generative Models in Science

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords distancesmodelsgenerativestatisticaldifferentdistanceevaluatescience
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Generative models are invaluable in many fields of science because of their ability to capture high-dimensional and complicated distributions, such as photo-realistic images, protein structures, and connectomes. How do we evaluate the samples these models generate? This work aims to provide an accessible entry point to understanding popular sample-based statistical distances, requiring only foundational knowledge in mathematics and statistics. We focus on four commonly used notions of statistical distances representing different methodologies: Using low-dimensional projections (Sliced-Wasserstein; SW), obtaining a distance using classifiers (Classifier Two-Sample Tests; C2ST), using embeddings through kernels (Maximum Mean Discrepancy; MMD), or neural networks (Fr\'echet Inception Distance; FID). We highlight the intuition behind each distance and explain their merits, scalability, complexity, and pitfalls. To demonstrate how these distances are used in practice, we evaluate generative models from different scientific domains, namely a model of decision-making and a model generating medical images. We showcase that distinct distances can give different results on similar data. Through this guide, we aim to help researchers to use, interpret, and evaluate statistical distances for generative models in science.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Spectral Born machines: classically trainable quantum generative models for discrete data

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Spectral Born machines are Fourier-phase quantum generative models over Z_d^n that train classically via graph-spectral MMD and show reduced parameters plus apparent overfitting resistance on integer data.

  2. How Human-Like Are Large Language Models? A Register-Aware Linguistic Evaluation Framework

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    The authors introduce a register-aware evaluation framework that compares LLM outputs to human reference corpora via Biber's lexico-grammatical features and MMD across five English registers.

  3. How Human-Like Are Large Language Models? A Register-Aware Linguistic Evaluation Framework

    cs.CL 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A new evaluation framework using MMD on Biber features shows LLMs deviate from human linguistic distributions across registers, with closest models varying by register rather than size.

  4. MIND: Monge Inception Distance for Generative Models Evaluation

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    MIND uses sliced Wasserstein distance on Inception features to evaluate generative models, matching FID performance with 10x fewer samples and 100x faster computation while being more robust to moment-matching attacks.