pith. sign in

arxiv: 2403.13699 · v11 · submitted 2024-03-20 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.stat-mech

On blocking Dispersion of Matter by Energy conservation

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 03:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords nonlinear termsenergy conservationwavefunction dispersionmacroscopic superpositionscommutation relationsspin modelsmeasurement problemcollapse models
0
0 comments X

The pith

Nonlinear terms that block spatial wavefunction dispersion by energy conservation satisfy the derived commutation relations, but their generalization to non-pure spin models does not.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews a mechanism in which nonlinear terms added to the Schrödinger equation suppress macroscopic superpositions through energy conservation. It derives the commutation relations these terms must obey to remain physically admissible. The original terms that confine the wavefunction in space meet the relations, while the generalized versions intended for spin models to produce finite-temperature magnetization do not. A toy model illustrates that spatial cats encounter an energy barrier. The work ends with a comparison to standard collapse models.

Core claim

The nonlinear terms confining the wavefunction in space satisfy the commutation relations required for physical admissibility under energy conservation. When these terms are generalized to non-pure spin models, they fail to satisfy the same relations, which may account for earlier observations about magnetization at finite temperature.

What carries the argument

Commutation relations that nonlinear terms must satisfy to preserve physical admissibility when energy conservation is used to suppress macroscopic superpositions.

If this is right

  • Spatial confining terms remain consistent with energy conservation.
  • Generalized spin terms violate the commutation relations needed for admissibility.
  • Formation of spatial cats is blocked by an energy barrier in the toy model.
  • The failure for non-pure states supplies an interpretation of prior magnetization results.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Only a restricted class of nonlinear modifications can block dispersion while respecting energy conservation.
  • The mechanism may require pure-state assumptions to function for spin systems.
  • Direct tests could search for the predicted energy cost when superpositions attempt to form across separated locations.

Load-bearing premise

The nonlinear terms must obey specific commutation relations derived from energy conservation to count as physically admissible.

What would settle it

An explicit check, for a chosen non-pure spin Hamiltonian, of whether the generalized nonlinear term commutes with the total energy operator in the manner required by the derived relations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2403.13699 by Leonardo De Carlo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. External potential vs apparatus spin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In [L. De Carlo and W. D. Wick, Entropy 25, 564 (2023)], we considered the problem of wavefunction ensembles for spin models. To observe magnetization at finite temperature, we had to add macroscopic nonlinear terms that suppress macroscopic superpositions by energy conservation. The nonlinear terms were of the kind introduced in [W. D. Wick, arXiv:1710.03278 (2017)] to block spatial cats by energy conservation, proposed as a solution to the Measurement Problem. Reviewing this theory, I derive commutation relations that these nonlinear terms have to satisfy to be physically admissible, and show that the ones confining the wavefunction in space do indeed satisfy these relations. I generalize the terms of [L. De Carlo and W. D. Wick, Entropy 25, 564 (2023)] for non-pure spin models and check if they also satisfy the constraints, concluding with a negative answer and possibly giving an interpretation of the previous results. With a toy model I present the main experimental idea, that is that forming spatial cats meets an energy barrier. A comparison with Collapse Models is at the end.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews the theory of nonlinear terms introduced to block spatial superpositions of matter via energy conservation, as proposed in prior works. It derives commutation relations required for these terms to be physically admissible, verifies that the spatial-confining terms satisfy the relations, generalizes the terms from the 2023 De Carlo-Wick paper to non-pure spin models, and reports that the generalizations fail the constraints. A toy model illustrates the experimental idea of an energy barrier preventing spatial cats, with a final comparison to collapse models.

Significance. If the algebraic verification holds, the work supplies a consistency check on the nonlinear terms from the 2023 Entropy paper, supporting their use for suppressing macroscopic superpositions while highlighting limitations when extending to generalized spin models. The negative result for the generalizations may interpret prior findings on magnetization. The toy model is a strength, as it points toward a concrete, falsifiable experimental test involving energy barriers. These elements add to the literature on energy-conservation-based approaches to the measurement problem.

major comments (2)
  1. [Review of the theory and derivation of commutation relations] The commutation relations are obtained by reviewing the 2023 De Carlo-Wick paper and the 2017 Wick arXiv preprint. To permit independent assessment of the claim that the generalized terms fail the constraints, the explicit algebraic steps computing the commutators for the generalized nonlinear terms (including their action on non-pure states) should be supplied in the manuscript rather than referenced externally.
  2. [Toy model for experimental idea] The toy model section presents the experimental idea that forming spatial cats meets an energy barrier, but provides no quantitative estimates (e.g., barrier height in energy units, relevant timescales, or coupling parameters) that would allow evaluation of experimental feasibility or direct comparison with the commutation-relation constraints.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction use first-person singular ('I generalize', 'I derive'); for journal style, consider consistent use of 'we' or passive voice.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the suggested improvements in a revised version.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Review of the theory and derivation of commutation relations] The commutation relations are obtained by reviewing the 2023 De Carlo-Wick paper and the 2017 Wick arXiv preprint. To permit independent assessment of the claim that the generalized terms fail the constraints, the explicit algebraic steps computing the commutators for the generalized nonlinear terms (including their action on non-pure states) should be supplied in the manuscript rather than referenced externally.

    Authors: We agree that explicit algebraic details would strengthen the manuscript and allow independent verification. In the revised version, we will add an appendix providing the full step-by-step computation of the commutators for the generalized nonlinear terms, including their explicit action on non-pure states and demonstration that the constraints are not satisfied. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Toy model for experimental idea] The toy model section presents the experimental idea that forming spatial cats meets an energy barrier, but provides no quantitative estimates (e.g., barrier height in energy units, relevant timescales, or coupling parameters) that would allow evaluation of experimental feasibility or direct comparison with the commutation-relation constraints.

    Authors: We acknowledge that quantitative estimates would improve the toy model's utility for assessing feasibility. In the revision, we will add order-of-magnitude estimates for the energy barrier height (relative to typical spin-interaction scales), relevant timescales, and coupling parameters, using standard values from condensed-matter systems to permit comparison with the commutation constraints. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper reviews prior self-cited works to derive commutation relations for physical admissibility under energy conservation, then performs a consistency check showing that spatial-confining nonlinear terms satisfy them while a generalization to non-pure spin models does not. No explicit equations, derivation steps, or reductions are supplied in the provided text that would allow exhibiting a specific reduction of the central claim to its inputs by construction (e.g., a fitted parameter renamed as prediction or a self-citation chain that is itself unverified). The consistency test on the generalized terms is presented as an independent computational verification, making the derivation self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the work rests on the prior nonlinear terms and the assumption that energy conservation imposes commutation constraints; no new free parameters or invented entities are explicitly introduced in the provided text.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Nonlinear terms must satisfy specific commutation relations to be physically admissible under energy conservation
    Stated when the paper reviews the theory and derives the conditions the terms have to obey

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5723 in / 1238 out tokens · 27923 ms · 2026-05-24T03:35:53.927283+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Arndt \ and\ author K

    author author M. Arndt \ and\ author K. Hornberger ,\ title title Testing the limits of quantum mechanical superpositions , \ @noop journal journal Nat. Phys. \ volume 10 ,\ pages 271--277 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

  2. [2]

    author author ERC Advanced Grant ,\ @noop title Q-tube , \ howpublished https://bist.eu/icfo-researcher-awarded-erc-advanced-grant/ ( year 2025 ) NoStop

  3. [3]

    author author ERC Synergy Grant ,\ @noop title Q-xtreme , \ howpublished https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/951234 ( year 2023 ),\ note grant agreement ID: 951234 NoStop

  4. [4]

    Bassi , author M

    author author A. Bassi , author M. Dorato , \ and\ author H. Ulbricht ,\ title title Collapse models: A theoretical, experimental and philosophical review , \ @noop journal journal Entropy \ volume 25 ,\ pages 645 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

  5. [5]

    author author J. R. \ Hance \ and\ author S. Hossenfelder ,\ title title What does it take to solve the measurement problem? \ @noop journal journal J. Phys. Commun. \ volume 6 ,\ pages 102001 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

  6. [6]

    author author W. D. \ Wick ,\ @noop title On the non-linear quantum mechanics and the measurement problem i. blocking cats , \ howpublished arXiv:1710.03278 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

  7. [7]

    De Carlo \ and\ author W

    author author L. De Carlo \ and\ author W. D. \ Wick ,\ title title On magnetic models in wavefunction ensembles , \ @noop journal journal Entropy \ volume 25 ,\ pages 564 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

  8. [8]

    author author A. J. \ Leggett ,\ title title Macroscopic quantum systems and the quantum theory of measurement , \ @noop journal journal Supplement to the Progress of Theoretical Physics \ volume 69 ,\ pages 90 ( year 1980 ) NoStop

  9. [9]

    Schrödinger ,\ @noop title Statistical Thermodynamics \ ( publisher Dover Publications, Inc

    author author E. Schrödinger ,\ @noop title Statistical Thermodynamics \ ( publisher Dover Publications, Inc. ,\ address New York ,\ year 1952 ) NoStop

  10. [10]

    author author E. Schrödinger ,\ title The exchange of energy according to wave-mechanics , \ in\ @noop booktitle Collected Papers on Wave Mechanics \ ( publisher Blackie & Son Limited ,\ address London and Glasgow ,\ year 1928 )\ pp.\ pages 137--146 NoStop

  11. [11]

    Bloch ,\ @noop title Fundamentals of Statistical Mechanics, prepared by J.D

    author author F. Bloch ,\ @noop title Fundamentals of Statistical Mechanics, prepared by J.D. Walecka \ ( publisher Imperial College Press, World Scientific ,\ year 2000 ) NoStop

  12. [12]

    author author M. Campisi ,\ title title Quantum fluctuation relations for ensembles of wave functions , \ @noop journal journal New Journal of Physics \ volume 15 ,\ pages 115008 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

  13. [13]

    Jona-Lasinio \ and\ author C

    author author G. Jona-Lasinio \ and\ author C. Presilla ,\ title title On the statistics of quantum expectations for systems in thermal equilibrium , \ in\ @noop booktitle Quantum Mechanics: Are there Quantum Jumps? and On the Present Status of Quantum Mechanics ,\ Vol.\ volume 844 ,\ editor edited by\ editor A. Bassi , editor D. Dürr , editor T. Weber , ...

  14. [14]

    Lebowitz ,\ @noop title Microscopic origin of macroscopic behavior , \ howpublished arXiv:2105.03470 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    author author J. Lebowitz ,\ @noop title Microscopic origin of macroscopic behavior , \ howpublished arXiv:2105.03470 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

  15. [15]

    Anza \ and\ author J

    author author F. Anza \ and\ author J. P. \ Crutchfield ,\ title title Geometric quantum thermodynamics , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 106 ,\ pages 054102 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

  16. [16]

    author author D. C. \ Brody \ and\ author L. P. \ Hughston ,\ title title The quantum canonical ensemble , \ @noop journal journal J. Math. Phys. \ volume 39 ,\ pages 6502--6508 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

  17. [17]

    author author W. D. \ Wick ,\ @noop title On the non-linear quantum mechanics and the measurement problem iii. poincaré , \ howpublished arXiv:1803.11236 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

  18. [18]

    author author W. D. \ Wick ,\ @noop title Chaos in a nonlinear wavefunction model: An alternative to born's probability hypothesis , \ howpublished arXiv:2502.02698 ( year 2025 a ) NoStop

  19. [19]

    Abdi , author P

    author author M. Abdi , author P. Degenfeld-Schonburg , author M. Sameti , author C. Navarrete-Benlloch , \ and\ author M. J. \ Hartmann ,\ title title Dissipative optomechanical preparation of macroscopic quantum superposition states , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 116 ,\ pages 233604 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

  20. [20]

    author author W. D. \ Wick ,\ @noop title That dot on the screen: also, what about born? and other objections to wavefunction physics , \ howpublished arXiv:2504.17808 ( year 2025 b ) NoStop

  21. [21]

    author author W. H. \ Press , author S. A. \ Teukolsky , author W. T. \ Vetterling , \ and\ author B. P. \ Flannery ,\ @noop title Numerical Recipes in C \ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ address Cambridge, UK ,\ year 1988 ) NoStop

  22. [22]

    Tao ,\ title title Explicit symplectic approximation of nonseparable hamiltonians: algorithm and long-time performance , \ @noop journal journal Phys

    author author M. Tao ,\ title title Explicit symplectic approximation of nonseparable hamiltonians: algorithm and long-time performance , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 94 ,\ pages 043303 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

  23. [23]

    author author W. D. \ Wick ,\ @noop title On non-linear quantum mechanics and the measurement problem iv. experimental tests , \ howpublished arXiv:1908.02352 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

  24. [24]

    Ashkin , author J

    author author A. Ashkin , author J. M. \ Dziedzic , author J. E. \ Bjorkholm , \ and\ author S. Chu ,\ title title Observation of a single-beam gradient force optical trap for dielectric particles , \ @noop journal journal Opt. Lett. \ volume 11 ,\ pages 288--290 ( year 1986 ) NoStop

  25. [25]

    Higbie \ and\ author D

    author author J. Higbie \ and\ author D. M. \ Stamper-Kurn ,\ title title Generating macroscopic-quantum-superposition states in momentum and internal-state space from bose-einstein condensates with repulsive interactions , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 69 ,\ pages 053605 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

  26. [26]

    Sadler , author J

    author author L. Sadler , author J. Higbie , author C. Hetherington , author S. Schmid , author M. Pasienski , \ and\ author D. M. \ Stamper-Kurn ,\ title Periodically-dressed Bose-Einstein condensate in ^ 87 Rb , \ NoStop

  27. [27]

    title author author G. C. \ Ghirardi , author A. Rimini , \ and\ author T. Weber ,\ title title Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 34 ,\ pages 470 ( year 1986 ) NoStop

  28. [28]

    author author G. C. \ Ghirardi , author P. Pearle , \ and\ author A. Rimini ,\ title title Markov processes in hilbert space and continuous spontaneous localization of systems of identical particles , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 42 ,\ pages 78 ( year 1990 ) NoStop

  29. [29]

    Fu ,\ title title Spontaneous radiation of free electrons in a nonrelativistic collapse model , \ @noop journal journal Phys

    author author Q. Fu ,\ title title Spontaneous radiation of free electrons in a nonrelativistic collapse model , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 56 ,\ pages 1806 ( year 1997 ) NoStop

  30. [30]

    Carlesso , author S

    author author M. Carlesso , author S. Donadi , author L. Ferialdi , author M. Paternostro , author H. Ulbricht , \ and\ author A. Bassi ,\ title title Present status and future challenges of non-interferometric tests of collapse models , \ @noop journal journal Nat. Phys. \ volume 18 ,\ pages 243--250 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

  31. [31]

    Bilardello , author S

    author author M. Bilardello , author S. Donadi , author A. Vinante , \ and\ author A. Bassi ,\ title title Bounds on collapse models from cold-atom experiments , \ @noop journal journal Physica A \ volume 462 ,\ pages 764--782 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

  32. [32]

    Kovachy , author J

    author author T. Kovachy , author J. M. \ Hogan , author A. Sugarbaker , author S. M. \ Dickerson , author C. A. \ Donnelly , author C. Overstreet , \ and\ author M. A. \ Kasevich ,\ title title Matter wave lensing to picokelvin temperatures , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 114 ,\ pages 143004 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

  33. [33]

    author author W. D. \ Wick \ and\ author L. De Carlo ,\ @noop title In preparation update of: Islands of instability in nonlinear wavefunction models in the continuum: A different route to "chaos" , \ howpublished arXiv:2512.09109 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

  34. [34]

    author author P. A. M. \ Dirac , author V. A. \ Fock , \ and\ author B. Podolsky ,\ title title On quantum electrodynamics , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Z. Sowjetunion \ volume 2 ,\ pages 468--479 ( year 1932 ) ,\ note reprinted in: Selected Papers on Quantum Electrodynamics, J. Schwinger, ed., Dover, New York (1958) NoStop

  35. [35]

    Lienert , author S

    author author M. Lienert , author S. Petrat , \ and\ author R. Tumulka ,\ title title Multi-time wave functions , \ @noop journal journal J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. \ volume 880 ,\ pages 012006 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

  36. [36]

    author author W. D. \ Wick ,\ @noop title On non-linear quantum mechanics, space-time wavefunctions, and compatibility with general relativity , \ howpublished arXiv:2008.08663 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

  37. [37]

    Bassi \ and\ author G

    author author A. Bassi \ and\ author G. Ghirardi ,\ title title Dynamical reduction models , \ @noop journal journal Phys. Rep. \ volume 379 ,\ pages 257--426 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

  38. [38]

    author author A. O. \ Barut ,\ title title Brief history and recent developments in electron theory and quantum electrodynamics , \ in\ @noop booktitle The Electron ,\ editor edited by\ editor D. Hestenes \ and\ editor A. Weingartshofer \ ( publisher Kluwer Academic Publishers ,\ year 1991 ) NoStop

  39. [39]

    author author A. O. \ Barut ,\ title title Nonlinear nonlocal classical field theory of quantum phenomena , \ @noop journal journal Int. J. Eng. Sci. \ volume 30 ,\ pages 1469--1473 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

  40. [40]

    Ellis ,\ @noop title The theory of large deviations , \ ( year 2009 ),\ note see page 72 and citation there NoStop

    author author R. Ellis ,\ @noop title The theory of large deviations , \ ( year 2009 ),\ note see page 72 and citation there NoStop