REVIEW 2 cited by
Can ChatGPT Detect DeepFakes? A Study of Using Multimodal Large Language Models for Media Forensics
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
DeepFakes, which refer to AI-generated media content, have become an increasing concern due to their use as a means for disinformation. Detecting DeepFakes is currently solved with programmed machine learning algorithms. In this work, we investigate the capabilities of multimodal large language models (LLMs) in DeepFake detection. We conducted qualitative and quantitative experiments to demonstrate multimodal LLMs and show that they can expose AI-generated images through careful experimental design and prompt engineering. This is interesting, considering that LLMs are not inherently tailored for media forensic tasks, and the process does not require programming. We discuss the limitations of multimodal LLMs for these tasks and suggest possible improvements.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Continuously Evolving Deepfake Detection: An Architecture and Public-Benchmark Evaluation of a Dynamic Detection System
A continuously refreshed, incentive-driven deepfake detector beats static detectors on in-the-wild benchmarks and improves on post-export AI-generated media.
-
Visual Language Models as Zero-Shot Deepfake Detectors
Zero-shot VLMs scored by normalized yes/no token probabilities beat most trained deepfake detectors on a new SimSwap dataset, and a lightly fine-tuned InstructBLIP is near-perfect on DFDC-P.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.