Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Visual Hallucination: Definition, Quantification, and Prescriptive Remediations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.17306 v2 pith:KAWIP753 submitted 2024-03-26 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords hallucinationvisualcaptioningeightfine-grainedmodelstasksvlms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The troubling rise of hallucination presents perhaps the most significant impediment to the advancement of responsible AI. In recent times, considerable research has focused on detecting and mitigating hallucination in Large Language Models (LLMs). However, it's worth noting that hallucination is also quite prevalent in Vision-Language models (VLMs). In this paper, we offer a fine-grained discourse on profiling VLM hallucination based on two tasks: i) image captioning, and ii) Visual Question Answering (VQA). We delineate eight fine-grained orientations of visual hallucination: i) Contextual Guessing, ii) Identity Incongruity, iii) Geographical Erratum, iv) Visual Illusion, v) Gender Anomaly, vi) VLM as Classifier, vii) Wrong Reading, and viii) Numeric Discrepancy. We curate Visual HallucInation eLiciTation (VHILT), a publicly available dataset comprising 2,000 samples generated using eight VLMs across two tasks of captioning and VQA along with human annotations for the categories as mentioned earlier.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models via DPO: On-Policy Data Hold the Key

    cs.CV 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    OPA-DPO aligns expert-corrected hallucination responses with the model's own distribution via SFT before DPO, cutting hallucination rates on AMBER and Object-Hal benchmarks.

  2. ComprehendEdit: A Comprehensive Dataset and Evaluation Framework for Multimodal Knowledge Editing

    cs.CV 2024-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new eight-task benchmark with in-domain metrics KGI and KPI reveals that existing multimodal editing methods degrade on related samples, and the proposed HICE method achieves a better balance.

Pith tools