Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

LUQ: Long-text Uncertainty Quantification for LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.20279 v3 pith:IWWHYSRN submitted 2024-03-29 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords responsesfactualitygenerationllmstexttextscuncertaintyexisting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capability in a variety of NLP tasks. However, LLMs are also prone to generate nonfactual content. Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) is pivotal in enhancing our understanding of a model's confidence on its generation, thereby aiding in the mitigation of nonfactual outputs. Existing research on UQ predominantly targets short text generation, typically yielding brief, word-limited responses. However, real-world applications frequently necessitate much longer responses. Our study first highlights the limitations of current UQ methods in handling long text generation. We then introduce \textsc{Luq} and its two variations, a series of novel sampling-based UQ approaches specifically designed for long text. Our findings reveal that \textsc{Luq} outperforms existing baseline methods in correlating with the model's factuality scores (negative coefficient of -0.85 observed for Gemini Pro). To further improve the factuality of LLM responses, we propose \textsc{Luq-Ensemble}, a method that ensembles responses from multiple models and selects the response with the lowest uncertainty. The ensembling method greatly improves the response factuality upon the best standalone LLM.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evaluating LLM Uncertainty in Long-Form Generation Using Deterministic Ground Truth

    cs.AI 2026-07 accept novelty 6.5 of 10

    SALT enables judge-free unit-level uncertainty evaluation on deterministic long-form tasks and shows atomic ranking collapse, path-dependent error drivers, and a reasoning–ranking trade-off across 50+ LLMs.

  2. Beyond Semantic Entropy: Boosting LLM Uncertainty Quantification with Pairwise Semantic Similarity

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SNNE estimates LLM uncertainty from pairwise semantic similarities of sampled answers using a log-sum-exp aggregation, and it generalizes semantic entropy as a special case.

  3. ChemAU: Harness the Reasoning of LLMs in Chemical Research with Adaptive Uncertainty Estimation

    cs.AI 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    ChemAU adds a position penalty to token-level uncertainty estimates so that flagged reasoning steps are corrected by a fine-tuned chemistry model, reporting improved accuracy on GPQA, MMLU-Pro, and SuperGPQA chemistry...

Pith tools