Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Recover: A Neuro-Symbolic Framework for Failure Detection and Recovery

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.00756 v1 pith:56FR5SZ6 submitted 2024-03-31 cs.AI cs.LGcs.LOcs.RO

classification cs.AIcs.LGcs.LOcs.RO
keywords recoveryrecoverfailurellmsapproachescostsdetectionfailures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recognizing failures during task execution and implementing recovery procedures is challenging in robotics. Traditional approaches rely on the availability of extensive data or a tight set of constraints, while more recent approaches leverage large language models (LLMs) to verify task steps and replan accordingly. However, these methods often operate offline, necessitating scene resets and incurring in high costs. This paper introduces Recover, a neuro-symbolic framework for online failure identification and recovery. By integrating ontologies, logical rules, and LLM-based planners, Recover exploits symbolic information to enhance the ability of LLMs to generate recovery plans and also to decrease the associated costs. In order to demonstrate the capabilities of our method in a simulated kitchen environment, we introduce OntoThor, an ontology describing the AI2Thor simulator setting. Empirical evaluation shows that OntoThor's logical rules accurately detect all failures in the analyzed tasks, and that Recover considerably outperforms, for both failure detection and recovery, a baseline method reliant solely on LLMs.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Interventional Causal Circuits for Safe Robot Action Testing and Failure Recovery

    cs.RO 2026-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A causal circuit built from a Joint Probability Tree lets a robot correct rejected motion plans in one shot, cutting failed safety-test attempts by 10–37% in simulation.

Pith tools