Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

A Review of Multi-Modal Large Language and Vision Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.01322 v1 pith:KEBYCFA5 submitted 2024-03-28 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords llmsmodelsmm-llmsmulti-modalcapabilitieslanguagelargemodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently emerged as a focal point of research and application, driven by their unprecedented ability to understand and generate text with human-like quality. Even more recently, LLMs have been extended into multi-modal large language models (MM-LLMs) which extends their capabilities to deal with image, video and audio information, in addition to text. This opens up applications like text-to-video generation, image captioning, text-to-speech, and more and is achieved either by retro-fitting an LLM with multi-modal capabilities, or building a MM-LLM from scratch. This paper provides an extensive review of the current state of those LLMs with multi-modal capabilities as well as the very recent MM-LLMs. It covers the historical development of LLMs especially the advances enabled by transformer-based architectures like OpenAI's GPT series and Google's BERT, as well as the role of attention mechanisms in enhancing model performance. The paper includes coverage of the major and most important of the LLMs and MM-LLMs and also covers the techniques of model tuning, including fine-tuning and prompt engineering, which tailor pre-trained models to specific tasks or domains. Ethical considerations and challenges, such as data bias and model misuse, are also analysed to underscore the importance of responsible AI development and deployment. Finally, we discuss the implications of open-source versus proprietary models in AI research. Through this review, we provide insights into the transformative potential of MM-LLMs in various applications.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 9 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Spatiotemporal Knowledge Graphs as Persistent Scene Memory for Embodied Question Answering

    cs.RO 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A training-free pipeline constructs a spatiotemporal knowledge graph from egocentric video, enabling low-latency, explainable embodied question answering.

  2. LLMs for LLMs: A Structured Prompting Methodology for Long Legal Documents

    cs.AI 2025-09 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    On CUAD legal contracts, a prompt-engineered QWEN-2 pipeline with chunking and two answer-selection heuristics reportedly outperforms the fine-tuned DeBERTa-large baseline by about 9%, reaching claimed state-of-the-ar...

  3. Uncertainty-o: One Model-agnostic Framework for Unveiling Uncertainty in Large Multimodal Models

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Uncertainty-o estimates uncertainty in large multimodal models by perturbing prompts and computing entropy over semantically clustered answers, improving hallucination detection across five modalities.

  4. HKD4VLM: A Progressive Hybrid Knowledge Distillation Framework for Robust Multimodal Hallucination and Factuality Detection in VLMs

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A progressive two-stage knowledge distillation framework (HKD4VLM) reports first-place F1 scores of 98.2% and 98.4% on multimodal hallucination and factuality detection, but its ablation lacks a directly fine-tuned baseline.

Pith tools