Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Consistency of the bootstrap for asymptotically linear estimators based on machine learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.03064 v2 pith:OQSF36F2 submitted 2024-04-03 math.ST stat.TH

Consistency of the bootstrap for asymptotically linear estimators based on machine learning

classification math.ST stat.TH
keywords bootstrapestimatorsconfidenceintervalsresultsasymptoticallyconsistencyempirical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The bootstrap is a popular method of constructing confidence intervals due to its ease of use and broad applicability. Theoretical properties of bootstrap procedures have been established in a variety of settings. However, there is limited theoretical research on the use of the bootstrap in the context of estimation of a differentiable functional in a nonparametric or semiparametric model when nuisance functions are estimated using machine learning. In this article, we provide general conditions for consistency of the bootstrap in such scenarios. Our results cover a range of estimator constructions, nuisance estimation methods, bootstrap sampling distributions, and bootstrap confidence interval types. We provide refined results for the empirical bootstrap and smoothed bootstraps, and for one-step estimators, plug-in estimators, empirical mean plug-in estimators, and estimating equations-based estimators. We illustrate the use of our general results by demonstrating the asymptotic validity of bootstrap confidence intervals for the average density value and G-computed conditional mean parameters, and compare their performance in finite samples using numerical studies. Throughout, we emphasize whether and how the bootstrap can produce asymptotically valid confidence intervals when standard methods fail to do so.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Calibeating Prediction-Powered Inference

    stat.ML 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Post-hoc calibration of miscalibrated black-box predictions on a labeled sample improves efficiency of prediction-powered inference for semisupervised mean estimation.

  2. Bootstrap consistency for general double/debiased machine learning estimators

    math.ST 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Bootstrap inference is valid for general DML estimators under the conditions required for DML validity itself.