REVIEW 4 cited by
LVLM-Interpret: An Interpretability Tool for Large Vision-Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In the rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence, multi-modal large language models are emerging as a significant area of interest. These models, which combine various forms of data input, are becoming increasingly popular. However, understanding their internal mechanisms remains a complex task. Numerous advancements have been made in the field of explainability tools and mechanisms, yet there is still much to explore. In this work, we present a novel interactive application aimed towards understanding the internal mechanisms of large vision-language models. Our interface is designed to enhance the interpretability of the image patches, which are instrumental in generating an answer, and assess the efficacy of the language model in grounding its output in the image. With our application, a user can systematically investigate the model and uncover system limitations, paving the way for enhancements in system capabilities. Finally, we present a case study of how our application can aid in understanding failure mechanisms in a popular large multi-modal model: LLaVA.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
MVI-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Robustness to Misleading Visual Inputs in LVLMs
MVI-Bench supplies the first taxonomy and dataset focused on misleading visual inputs to measure LVLM robustness, with tests on 18 models revealing clear weaknesses.
-
Backdoor Attack on Vision Language Models with Stealthy Semantic Manipulation
BadSem shows that semantic mismatches between images and text can serve as stealthy backdoor triggers for VLMs, achieving near-perfect attack success with low poisoning rates.
-
On the Risk of Misleading Reports: Diagnosing Textual Biases in Multimodal Clinical AI
A new perturbation test shows that medical vision-language models rely more on clinical text than on images, with calibration errors growing when text conflicts with the image.
-
Adapting Lightweight Vision Language Models for Radiological Visual Question Answering
A 3B PaliGemma model fine-tuned with synthetic QA pairs and two-stage training reaches 41.5% accuracy on open-ended radiology VQA, about 15 points below LLaVA-Med.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.