REVIEW 3 cited by
The Use of Generative Search Engines for Knowledge Work and Complex Tasks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Until recently, search engines were the predominant method for people to access online information. The recent emergence of large language models (LLMs) has given machines new capabilities such as the ability to generate new digital artifacts like text, images, code etc., resulting in a new tool, a generative search engine, which combines the capabilities of LLMs with a traditional search engine. Through the empirical analysis of Bing Copilot (Bing Chat), one of the first publicly available generative search engines, we analyze the types and complexity of tasks that people use Bing Copilot for compared to Bing Search. Findings indicate that people use the generative search engine for more knowledge work tasks that are higher in cognitive complexity than were commonly done with a traditional search engine.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
News Source Citing Patterns in AI Search Systems
AI search engines concentrate news citations among a few mostly left-leaning, high-quality outlets, and users do not appear to base preferences on cited source leaning or quality.
-
ELI-Why: Evaluating the Pedagogical Utility of Language Model Explanations
ELI-Why shows GPT-4's grade-tailored explanations often miss the intended educational level and are less informative than human-curated explanations.
-
Explainable Information Retrieval in the Audit Domain
A position paper proposing research directions and challenges for explainable information retrieval (XIR) in the audit domain, with no empirical results.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.