Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

What Are the Odds? Improving the foundations of Statistical Model Checking

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.05424 v2 pith:CZRWHPXM submitted 2024-04-08 cs.AI cs.LGcs.SYeess.SY

classification cs.AIcs.LGcs.SYeess.SY
keywords modelalgorithmsprobabilitiesstatisticaltheytransitioncheckingdecision
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Markov decision processes (MDPs) are a fundamental model for decision making under uncertainty. They exhibit non-deterministic choice as well as probabilistic uncertainty. Traditionally, verification algorithms assume exact knowledge of the probabilities that govern the behaviour of an MDP. As this assumption is often unrealistic in practice, statistical model checking (SMC) was developed in the past two decades. It allows to analyse MDPs with unknown transition probabilities and provide probably approximately correct (PAC) guarantees on the result. Model-based SMC algorithms sample the MDP and build a model of it by estimating all transition probabilities, essentially for every transition answering the question: ``What are the odds?'' However, so far the statistical methods employed by the state of the art SMC algorithms are quite naive. Our contribution are several fundamental improvements to those methods: On the one hand, we survey statistics literature for better concentration inequalities; on the other hand, we propose specialised approaches that exploit our knowledge of the MDP. Our improvements are generally applicable to many kinds of problem statements because they are largely independent of the setting. Moreover, our experimental evaluation shows that they lead to significant gains, reducing the number of samples that the SMC algorithm has to collect by up to two orders of magnitude.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Data-Efficient Safe Policy Improvement Using Parametric Structure

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Parametric SPIBB and game-based pruning reduce the data required for safe policy improvement by up to two orders of magnitude, while SMT-based pruning is shown to be computationally infeasible.

  2. Data-Driven Yet Formal Policy Synthesis for Stochastic Nonlinear Dynamical Systems

    eess.SY 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A sampling-based method constructs interval Markov decision process abstractions for nonlinear stochastic systems, enabling synthesis of control policies with PAC reach-avoid guarantees.

Pith tools