Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Graph Reinforcement Learning for Combinatorial Optimization: A Survey and Unifying Perspective

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.06492 v2 pith:24FI2QXC submitted 2024-04-09 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords graphlearningreinforcementproblemsprocessalgorithmscombinatorialdecision-making
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Graphs are a natural representation for systems based on relations between connected entities. Combinatorial optimization problems, which arise when considering an objective function related to a process of interest on discrete structures, are often challenging due to the rapid growth of the solution space. The trial-and-error paradigm of Reinforcement Learning has recently emerged as a promising alternative to traditional methods, such as exact algorithms and (meta)heuristics, for discovering better decision-making strategies in a variety of disciplines including chemistry, computer science, and statistics. Despite the fact that they arose in markedly different fields, these techniques share significant commonalities. Therefore, we set out to synthesize this work in a unifying perspective that we term Graph Reinforcement Learning, interpreting it as a constructive decision-making method for graph problems. After covering the relevant technical background, we review works along the dividing line of whether the goal is to optimize graph structure given a process of interest, or to optimize the outcome of the process itself under fixed graph structure. Finally, we discuss the common challenges facing the field and open research questions. In contrast with other surveys, the present work focuses on non-canonical graph problems for which performant algorithms are typically not known and Reinforcement Learning is able to provide efficient and effective solutions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Graph-Enhanced Policy Optimization in LLM Agent Training

    cs.AI 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GEPO adds graph-centrality-based intrinsic rewards, dynamic discounts, and two-level advantage shaping to group-based RL, improving LLM agent success on ALFWorld, WebShop, and a private Workbench benchmark.

  2. INSPIRE-GNN: Intelligent Sensor Placement to Improve Sparse Bicycling Network Prediction via Reinforcement Learning Boosted Graph Neural Networks

    cs.LG 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    A reinforcement learning boosted graph neural network selects additional sensor locations to improve link-level bicycle volume estimation under 99 percent data sparsity.

  3. Large Language Models for Next-Generation Wireless Network Management: A Survey and Tutorial

    cs.NI 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A survey and tutorial that organizes LLM-enabled wireless network optimization into formulation, solution, and verification stages, with case studies drawn from the authors' own prior papers.

Pith tools