Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Apollonion: Profile-centric Dialog Agent

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.08692 v1 pith:MOSASYVE submitted 2024-04-10 cs.IR cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.IRcs.AIcs.CL
keywords responseuserdialogagentspersonalizationmethodagentbesides
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) has innovated the development of dialog agents. Specially, a well-trained LLM, as a central process unit, is capable of providing fluent and reasonable response for user's request. Besides, auxiliary tools such as external knowledge retrieval, personalized character for vivid response, short/long-term memory for ultra long context management are developed, completing the usage experience for LLM-based dialog agents. However, the above-mentioned techniques does not solve the issue of \textbf{personalization from user perspective}: agents response in a same fashion to different users, without consideration of their features, such as habits, interests and past experience. In another words, current implementation of dialog agents fail in ``knowing the user''. The capacity of well-description and representation of user is under development. In this work, we proposed a framework for dialog agent to incorporate user profiling (initialization, update): user's query and response is analyzed and organized into a structural user profile, which is latter served to provide personal and more precise response. Besides, we proposed a series of evaluation protocols for personalization: to what extend the response is personal to the different users. The framework is named as \method{}, inspired by inscription of ``Know Yourself'' in the temple of Apollo (also known as \method{}) in Ancient Greek. Few works have been conducted on incorporating personalization into LLM, \method{} is a pioneer work on guiding LLM's response to meet individuation via the application of dialog agents, with a set of evaluation methods for measurement in personalization.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ClawRec: A Claw-Native Recommender System

    cs.IR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5 of 10

    ClawRec turns cross-platform behavior into a temporally managed user state and role-aware complementary slates, beating agentic baselines on a new synthetic life-event benchmark.

  2. Persona2Web: Benchmarking Personalized Web Agents for Contextual Reasoning with User History

    cs.CL 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Persona2Web is a new open-web benchmark where agents must infer a user's preferences from synthetic browsing history to solve intentionally ambiguous queries; current best agents score 13% success.

  3. ProfiLLM: An LLM-Based Framework for Implicit Profiling of Chatbot Users

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ProfiLLM infers chatbot users' IT/cybersecurity proficiency from their prompts, achieving a rapid initial reduction in profiling error in synthetic and limited human evaluations.

  4. Matching Game Preferences Through Dialogical Large Language Models: A Perspective

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    This perspective paper proposes the D-LLM framework, which couples the authors' GRAPHYP knowledge graphs with LLMs to personalize AI responses and make reasoning traceable, but no empirical validation is presented.

Pith tools