Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Transformers, Contextualism, and Polysemy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.09577 v2 pith:Z2JMV2C7 submitted 2024-04-15 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords polysemytransformerarchitecturearguecontextualismdebatelanguagemeaning
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The transformer architecture, introduced by Vaswani et al. (2017), is at the heart of the remarkable recent progress in the development of language models, including widely-used chatbots such as Chat-GPT and Claude. In this paper, I argue that we can extract from the way the transformer architecture works a theory of the relationship between context and meaning. I call this the transformer theory, and I argue that it is novel with regard to two related philosophical debates: the contextualism debate regarding the extent of context-sensitivity across natural language, and the polysemy debate regarding how polysemy should be captured within an account of word meaning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. How do Transformer Embeddings Represent Compositions? A Functional Analysis

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Modern transformer embeddings represent compound words approximately as linear combinations of their constituent word embeddings, with ridge regression slightly besting simple addition.

Pith tools