Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Rethinking Software Engineering in the Foundation Model Era: From Task-Driven AI Copilots to Goal-Driven AI Pair Programmers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.10225 v1 pith:BPTVD5FN submitted 2024-04-16 cs.SE cs.AI

classification cs.SEcs.AI
keywords pairprogrammerssoftwarecopilotsgoal-drivenhumanai-poweredcode
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The advent of Foundation Models (FMs) and AI-powered copilots has transformed the landscape of software development, offering unprecedented code completion capabilities and enhancing developer productivity. However, the current task-driven nature of these copilots falls short in addressing the broader goals and complexities inherent in software engineering (SE). In this paper, we propose a paradigm shift towards goal-driven AI-powered pair programmers that collaborate with human developers in a more holistic and context-aware manner. We envision AI pair programmers that are goal-driven, human partners, SE-aware, and self-learning. These AI partners engage in iterative, conversation-driven development processes, aligning closely with human goals and facilitating informed decision-making. We discuss the desired attributes of such AI pair programmers and outline key challenges that must be addressed to realize this vision. Ultimately, our work represents a shift from AI-augmented SE to AI-transformed SE by replacing code completion with a collaborative partnership between humans and AI that enhances both productivity and software quality.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Humans Integrate, Agents Fix: How Agent-Authored Pull Requests Are Referenced in Practice

    cs.SE 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Humans reference agent PRs mainly to build features; agents self-reference mainly to fix bugs; linked agent PRs require substantially more review effort.

  2. SEALGuard: Safeguarding the Multilingual Conversations in Southeast Asian Languages for LLM Software Systems

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A LoRA-adapted SeaLLM model detects unsafe and jailbreak prompts in nine Southeast Asian languages with 97% recall and 98% F1 on the authors' new SEALSBench benchmark, far above zero-shot LlamaGuard.

Pith tools