Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Aligning Language Models to Explicitly Handle Ambiguity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.11972 v3 pith:H6LFHX6E submitted 2024-04-18 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords ambiguityllmsambiguousexplicitlylanguageperceivedqueriesagents
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In interactions between users and language model agents, user utterances frequently exhibit ellipsis (omission of words or phrases) or imprecision (lack of exactness) to prioritize efficiency. This can lead to varying interpretations of the same input based on different assumptions or background knowledge. It is thus crucial for agents to adeptly handle the inherent ambiguity in queries to ensure reliability. However, even state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) still face challenges in such scenarios, primarily due to the following hurdles: (1) LLMs are not explicitly trained to deal with ambiguous utterances; (2) the degree of ambiguity perceived by the LLMs may vary depending on the possessed knowledge. To address these issues, we propose Alignment with Perceived Ambiguity (APA), a novel pipeline that aligns LLMs to manage ambiguous queries by leveraging their own assessment of ambiguity (i.e., perceived ambiguity). Experimental results on question-answering datasets demonstrate that APA empowers LLMs to explicitly detect and manage ambiguous queries while retaining the ability to answer clear questions. Furthermore, our finding proves that APA excels beyond training with gold-standard labels, especially in out-of-distribution scenarios. The data and code are available at https://github.com/heyjoonkim/APA.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 3 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Integrating Large Language Models into Text Animation: An Intelligent Editing System with Inline and Chat Interaction

    cs.HC 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A text-animation editor with inline and chat LLM agents was rated usable (SUS 75) by 11 non-professional testers.

  2. LLM-based ambiguity detection in natural language instructions for collaborative surgical robots

    cs.RO 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    An ensemble of five LLM evaluators plus conformal prediction labeled surgical instructions as ambiguous or clear with 70% (Llama 3.2 11B) and 82.5% (Gemma 3 12B) accuracy, measured in-sample on the 40-instruction cali...

Pith tools