REVIEW 2 cited by
Aligning Language Models to Explicitly Handle Ambiguity
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In interactions between users and language model agents, user utterances frequently exhibit ellipsis (omission of words or phrases) or imprecision (lack of exactness) to prioritize efficiency. This can lead to varying interpretations of the same input based on different assumptions or background knowledge. It is thus crucial for agents to adeptly handle the inherent ambiguity in queries to ensure reliability. However, even state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) still face challenges in such scenarios, primarily due to the following hurdles: (1) LLMs are not explicitly trained to deal with ambiguous utterances; (2) the degree of ambiguity perceived by the LLMs may vary depending on the possessed knowledge. To address these issues, we propose Alignment with Perceived Ambiguity (APA), a novel pipeline that aligns LLMs to manage ambiguous queries by leveraging their own assessment of ambiguity (i.e., perceived ambiguity). Experimental results on question-answering datasets demonstrate that APA empowers LLMs to explicitly detect and manage ambiguous queries while retaining the ability to answer clear questions. Furthermore, our finding proves that APA excels beyond training with gold-standard labels, especially in out-of-distribution scenarios. The data and code are available at https://github.com/heyjoonkim/APA.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Integrating Large Language Models into Text Animation: An Intelligent Editing System with Inline and Chat Interaction
A text-animation editor with inline and chat LLM agents was rated usable (SUS 75) by 11 non-professional testers.
-
LLM-based ambiguity detection in natural language instructions for collaborative surgical robots
An ensemble of five LLM evaluators plus conformal prediction labeled surgical instructions as ambiguous or clear with 70% (Llama 3.2 11B) and 82.5% (Gemma 3 12B) accuracy, measured in-sample on the 40-instruction cali...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.