Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Describe-then-Reason: Improving Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning through Visual Comprehension Training

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.14604 v3 pith:JD3VINX6 submitted 2024-04-22 cs.CL

Describe-then-Reason: Improving Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning through Visual Comprehension Training

classification cs.CL
keywords visualcomprehensionmathematicalreasoningtrainingmodelsmultimodalmllms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Open-source multimodal large language models (MLLMs) excel in various tasks involving textual and visual inputs but still struggle with complex multimodal mathematical reasoning, lagging behind proprietary models like GPT-4V(ision) and Gemini-Pro. Although fine-tuning with intermediate steps (i.e., rationales) elicits some mathematical reasoning skills, the resulting models still fall short in visual comprehension due to inadequate visual-centric supervision, which leads to inaccurate interpretation of math figures. To address this issue, we propose a two-step training pipeline VCAR, which emphasizes the Visual Comprehension training in Addition to mathematical Reasoning learning. It first improves the visual comprehension ability of MLLMs through the visual description generation task, followed by another training step on generating rationales with the assistance of descriptions. Experimental results on two popular benchmarks demonstrate that VCAR substantially outperforms baseline methods solely relying on rationale supervision, especially on problems with high visual demands.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ErrorRadar: Benchmarking Complex Mathematical Reasoning of Multimodal Large Language Models Via Error Detection

    cs.CL 2024-10 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    ErrorRadar is a new benchmark of 2,500 multimodal K-12 math problems for MLLM error step identification and categorization, where GPT-4o trails human experts by ~10%.

  2. Self-Rewarding Vision-Language Model via Reasoning Decomposition

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Vision SR1 decomposes VLM reasoning into visual and language components and uses internal self-rewards to improve visual reasoning and reduce hallucinations more efficiently than external-supervision methods.