Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

KiDS-SBI: Simulation-based inference analysis of KiDS-1000 cosmic shear

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.15402 v2 pith:AORYENEH submitted 2024-04-23 astro-ph.CO

KiDS-SBI: Simulation-based inference analysis of KiDS-1000 cosmic shear

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords analysiscosmicinferencekids-1000likelihoodmodelshearanisotropies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We present a simulation-based inference (SBI) cosmological analysis of cosmic shear two-point statistics from the fourth weak gravitational lensing data release of the ESO Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS-1000). KiDS-SBI efficiently performs non-Limber projection of the matter power spectrum via Levin's method, and constructs log-normal random matter fields on the curved sky for arbitrary cosmologies, including effective prescriptions for intrinsic alignments and baryonic feedback. The forward model samples realistic galaxy positions and shapes based on the observational characteristics, incorporating shear measurement and redshift calibration uncertainties, as well as angular anisotropies due to variations in depth and point-spread function. To enable direct comparison with standard inference, we limit our analysis to pseudo-angular power spectra. The SBI is based on sequential neural likelihood estimation to infer the posterior distribution of spatially-flat $\Lambda$CDM cosmological parameters from 18,000 realisations. We infer a mean marginal of the growth of structure parameter $S_{8} \equiv \sigma_8 (\Omega_\mathrm{m} / 0.3)^{0.5} = 0.731\pm 0.033$ ($68 \%$). We present a measure of goodness-of-fit for SBI and determine that the forward model fits the data well with a probability-to-exceed of $0.42$. For fixed cosmology, the learnt likelihood is approximately Gaussian, while constraints widen compared to a Gaussian likelihood analysis due to cosmology dependence in the covariance. Neglecting variable depth and anisotropies in the point spread function in the model can cause $S_{8}$ to be overestimated by ${\sim}5\%$. Our results are in agreement with previous analysis of KiDS-1000 and reinforce a $2.9 \sigma$ tension with constraints from cosmic microwave background measurements. This work highlights the importance of forward-modelling systematic effects in upcoming galaxy surveys.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Towards Practical Field-Level Inference for Weak Lensing

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Field-level inference from weak lensing maps yields significantly tighter cosmological constraints than power-spectrum analysis when using the same forward-modeling pipeline, especially on small scales.

  2. The Milky Way - Large Magellanic Cloud Interaction with Simulation Based Inference

    astro-ph.GA 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0

    Simulation-based inference on outer-halo star velocities gives a Milky Way reflex speed of 26.4 km/s and an LMC enclosed mass of 9.2×10^10 solar masses within 50 kpc.

  3. Machine Learning Techniques for Astrophysics and Cosmology: Photometric Redshifts

    astro-ph.IM 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    AI techniques for photometric redshift estimation have converged and are now limited by the size, systematics, and selection effects in spectroscopic training samples rather than by methodology.

  4. Euclid preparation. XCVIII. Cosmology Likelihood for Observables in Euclid (CLOE). 5: Extensions beyond the standard modelling of theoretical probes and systematic effects

    astro-ph.CO 2025-10 conditional novelty 3.0

    CLOE has been extended to model magnification bias, massive neutrinos, and modified gravity for Euclid probes and validated via posterior sampling on synthetic data.