Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Are Watermarks Bugs for Deepfake Detectors? Rethinking Proactive Forensics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.17867 v1 pith:OYIFX4P5 submitted 2024-04-27 cs.CV eess.IV

classification cs.CVeess.IV
keywords deepfakedetectorsforensicsimageswatermarkingwatermarksadvmarkproactive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

AI-generated content has accelerated the topic of media synthesis, particularly Deepfake, which can manipulate our portraits for positive or malicious purposes. Before releasing these threatening face images, one promising forensics solution is the injection of robust watermarks to track their own provenance. However, we argue that current watermarking models, originally devised for genuine images, may harm the deployed Deepfake detectors when directly applied to forged images, since the watermarks are prone to overlap with the forgery signals used for detection. To bridge this gap, we thus propose AdvMark, on behalf of proactive forensics, to exploit the adversarial vulnerability of passive detectors for good. Specifically, AdvMark serves as a plug-and-play procedure for fine-tuning any robust watermarking into adversarial watermarking, to enhance the forensic detectability of watermarked images; meanwhile, the watermarks can still be extracted for provenance tracking. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed AdvMark, leveraging robust watermarking to fool Deepfake detectors, which can help improve the accuracy of downstream Deepfake detection without tuning the in-the-wild detectors. We believe this work will shed some light on the harmless proactive forensics against Deepfake.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PhantomSeal: Proactive Deepfakes Defense with Identity/Context Protection and Forensic Tracing

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A single perturbation can steer face-swap outputs toward a chosen 'cloak' identity, giving both identity/context protection and forensic tracing.

  2. Invisible Watermarks, Visible Gains: Steering Machine Unlearning with Bi-Level Watermarking Design

    cs.CR 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Water4MU tunes an invisible watermark on data so that machine unlearning algorithms can remove requested images more effectively, beating prior methods on 'challenging forgets'.

  3. Unmasking Synthetic Realities in Generative AI: A Comprehensive Review of Adversarially Robust Deepfake Detection Systems

    cs.CR 2025-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A systematic review of deepfake detection finds a pervasive lack of adversarial robustness evaluation across all modalities and calls for resilient, modality-agnostic detectors.

Pith tools