Unmasking Synthetic Realities in Generative AI: A Comprehensive Review of Adversarially Robust Deepfake Detection Systems

Amine Bermak; Issa Khalil; Naseem Khan; Tuan Nguyen

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Unmasking Synthetic Realities in Generative AI: A Comprehensive Review of Adversarially Robust Deepfake Detection Systems

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A systematic review claims that state-of-the-art deepfake detectors are almost never evaluated against adversarial attacks, so their real-world reliability is unproven.

desk verdict A useful all-modality deepfake detection survey whose central 'adversarial robustness is almost universally missing' claim is plausible but not actually demonstrated by its own tables. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.21157 v1 pith:GBAA7IUP submitted 2025-07-24 cs.CR cs.CV

Naseem Khan , Tuan Nguyen , Amine Bermak , Issa Khalil This is my paper

classification cs.CRcs.CV

keywords DeepfakeDetectionGenerativeAIAdversarialRobustnessMulti-modalCross-domainGeneralizationSelf-SupervisedLearningEditedRegionLocalizationSyntheticMediaForensics

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is a systematic review of recent deepfake detection research, covering image, video, audio, text, and multi-modal methods as well as the localization of edited regions inside authentic content. Its central claim is that adversarial robustness is critically under-evaluated across both paradigms: detection methods perform well on clean benchmark data, but almost none are tested against adversarial perturbations designed to evade them. If that claim is right, high reported accuracy should not be read as real-world protection, because an attacker can often defeat a detector with imperceptible changes. The review also contributes a curated public repository of open-source implementations so that other researchers can replicate, extend, and stress-test the surveyed methods.

What carries the argument

The analytical engine is a two-paradigm taxonomy: detecting wholly synthetic media versus localizing edited regions, each examined across uni-modal and multi-modal systems. The review applies this taxonomy together with a systematic evaluation grid that scores methods on cross-domain generalization, natural perturbations, and adversarial robustness; the adversarial-robustness column is where the pattern of absence becomes visible. The inclusion criteria—peer-reviewed studies from January 2023 to early 2025 with public implementations—define the corpus that the taxonomy organizes.

What would settle it

Run a standardized adversarial attack suite (e.g., FGSM and PGD for audio, pixel-space and frequency-domain perturbations for images, synonym substitution for text) against the open-source detectors collected in the paper's repository; if most detectors retain high accuracy under these attacks, the review's central claim of pervasive vulnerability would be contradicted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The review's discovery is a structural gap rather than a new detector. Across roughly the surveyed 2023-2025 literature, methods in both paradigms—detection of fully synthetic media and localization of manipulated regions—showcase strong performance in controlled settings, but the tabulated evidence shows that evaluation against adversarial perturbations is largely or entirely missing. The paper catalogs concrete attack families that already succeed against existing detectors: pixel-space perturbations, frequency-domain manipulations, latent-space attacks on generative representations, backdoor poisoning, watermark-removal attacks, and audio or text perturbations, with reported examples such as audio detection accuracy falling from 98% to 26% and text detectors evaded at rates up to 91.3%. The conclusion is that the field's evaluation infrastructure, not just its models, needs to catch up with the adversarial threat landscape.

Load-bearing premise

The finding of 'almost universal absence' of adversarial evaluation rests on the review's inclusion criteria—studies from January 2023 to early 2025 with public implementations—and on trusting the cited papers' reported results without independent replication.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A detector that reports high accuracy on standard benchmarks may still be defeated by imperceptible adversarial perturbations, so deployment without adversarial evaluation is premature.
The field needs standardized adversarial benchmarks spanning pixel-space, frequency-domain, latent-space, backdoor, and watermarking attacks across all modalities, so that robustness claims become comparable.
Future detection research should prioritize adaptive, modality-agnostic architectures and cross-modal knowledge sharing over further improvements on clean benchmarks.
The curated public repository of open-source implementations gives the community a direct way to replicate and stress-test current detectors, turning the review's gap into an actionable checklist.
The reported attack successes, such as audio detector accuracy dropping from 98% to 26%, indicate that the vulnerability is concrete rather than hypothetical.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the identified gap is real, part of the explanation may be self-reinforcing: adversarial robustness studies are more likely to be excluded by the 'public implementation' criterion, so the literature's apparent silence on robustness may be even more pronounced than the true distribution of attempts.
A concrete test of the paper's framing is to evaluate the same open-source detectors under both single-modality and cross-modality attacks; a plausible outcome is that multi-modal detectors degrade less, because an attacker who perturbs only one channel leaves cross-modal inconsistencies intact.
The review's emphasis on standardized adversarial benchmarks implies a practical target: a public leaderboard where every detector faces the same attack suite, which would convert qualitative absence of robustness evaluation into quantitative ranking.
Because the review excludes theoretical papers without code, it may undercount defenses that propose principled robustness methods before implementations mature; those ideas might still matter even if they failed the inclusion filter.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

First thing to know: this is a useful, largely competent survey of 2023-2025 deepfake detection, but its headline claim — that adversarial robustness is 'almost universally' unevaluated — is asserted more strongly than the evidence section supports. The inclusion filter could be manufacturing part of the gap.

What's genuinely new is the all-modality scope: image, video, audio, text, plus the edited-region localization paradigm, in one place, with a curated GitHub repository of open-source implementations. Table 1's comparison with prior surveys is handy. The taxonomy (uni-modal vs multi-modal, detection vs localization) is sensible and well organized. The reproducibility emphasis is a real service; the field does need a maintained code list.

The soft spots are where the central claim lives. Section 3.1 restricts the sample to Jan 2023-early 2025 and excludes studies without public code. Section 6 itself cites pre-2023 and no-code adversarial work (Hussain et al. 2021, Saberi et al. 2023). So the 'almost universal absence' is arguably an artifact of the selection criteria. The tables contain no column recording whether each method was adversarially tested; the absence is asserted, not tabulated. That is the load-bearing weakness. A PRISMA-style flow with exclusion counts and a per-paper adversarial-evaluation flag would fix it.

Also, some quantitative claims in Section 6 — audio accuracy dropping 'from 98% to 26%,' text evasion 'up to 91.3%' — are unsourced; those need citations. And the claim that no prior work offers a unified framework across modalities is overstated: the paper's own Table 1 shows [34,35] already cover multi-modal plus adversarial robustness, just with less scope.

None of this is fatal; it's a revise-and-resubmit situation. The map is accurate at the level of 'these methods exist, here is what they do,' and the gap warning is directionally correct even if the 'almost universal' phrasing overshoots.

Who it's for: graduate students and researchers entering deepfake detection who want a modality-wide map and a code repository. It deserves a serious referee, and with the tables fixed and the absolute claims softened, it would be a solid citable reference.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This systematic review surveys deepfake detection methods published roughly between January 2023 and early 2025, organizing them into two paradigms: detection of fully synthetic media and localization of edited regions, across image, video, audio, text, and multi-modal settings. The paper claims that adversarial robustness is almost universally unevaluated in both paradigms, argues that this gap undermines real-world reliability, and contributes a curated GitHub repository of open-source implementations. The review also provides taxonomy tables (Tables 2–4), a comparison with prior surveys (Table 1), and a discussion of attack strategies and future directions in Section 6.

Significance. If the central claim is adequately supported, the paper would provide a useful synthesis across modalities and paradigms, going beyond prior surveys in coverage and in its explicit attention to adversarial robustness, cross-domain generalization, and reproducibility. The GitHub repository and the systematic comparison in Table 1 are concrete assets. However, the headline finding—that adversarial robustness is 'almost universally' absent—depends on an evidentiary base that is currently asserted rather than demonstrated: the review provides no PRISMA-style flow, no per-paper audit of adversarial evaluation, and no sensitivity analysis for its inclusion criteria. The significance is therefore conditional on strengthening the evidence for the gap claim.

major comments (4)

[Section 3.1; abstract; Section 3.4] The central claim that adversarial robustness is 'insufficiently evaluated' and 'almost universal[ly] absent' cannot be established from the stated inclusion criteria. The review restricts the sample to January 2023–early 2025 publications with public implementations and explicitly excludes 'theoretical discussions without publicly available implementation,' yet Section 6 itself cites pre-2023 and/or code-conditional adversarial work such as [42] (Hussain et al., 2021) and [257] (Saberi et al., 2023). Without a PRISMA-style flow, per-database search counts, exclusion counts, and a sensitivity check that includes pre-2023 and code-less adversarial evaluation studies, the review cannot distinguish 'the field does not evaluate robustness' from 'the selected subset does not report it.' This is load-bearing because the abstract and Section 3.4 generalize from the sample to the entire field.
[Tables 2, 3, and 4; Section 5] The 'almost universal absence' of adversarial evaluation is asserted in Section 5 and summarized in Table 4, but the tables contain no per-paper column recording whether each reviewed method was adversarially tested. The category labels 'Robust Learning' in Table 2 (e.g., [74, 67, 91, 83, 81] for image, [119, 120, 118, 121, 122] for video, [139, 140, 141, 142, 143, 144, 145] for audio) do not clarify whether the cited works actually ran adversarial-robustness experiments or instead evaluated natural perturbations, augmentation, or other forms of robustness. Without an explicit audit column or a companion table that marks each reference as 'adversarially evaluated' or 'not,' the review's central quantitative-sounding claim is not tabulated evidence but an interpretation.
[Section 6 (Adversarial Robustness subsection)] Several specific quantitative claims in Section 6 lack citations: the audio attack paragraph states that detection accuracies drop 'from 98% to 26%,' and the text attack paragraph states that evasion rates reach 'up to 91.3%,' but neither figure is linked to the cited references [266, 269, 270, 153] or any other source. The same paragraph lists attacks against named detectors such as MesoNet, XceptionNet, and RawNet3 without mapping those evaluations to the specific methods tabulated in Tables 2–4. These numerical claims are currently unsupported, and the lack of mapping weakens the paper's ability to support its 'systemic frailties' conclusion.
[Section 5; Section 6] The review does not reconcile its two evidentiary modes. Section 5 concludes that 'almost universal absence of rigorous testing against adversarial robustness' characterizes the localization literature summarized in Table 4, while Section 6 catalogs a substantial body of adversarial attacks against deepfake detectors, including watermarking attacks, latent-space attacks, and audio/text attacks. Some of these attacks target detectors that are outside the inclusion window or are not among the reviewed methods. To support the central claim, the paper should state explicitly how many of the reviewed methods (by paradigm and modality) were subjected to adversarial evaluation, and how many of the Section 6 attacks correspond to methods in Tables 2–4.

minor comments (5)

[Section 3.1] The search strategy should report the exact search date, the number of hits per database, and the number of records screened, included, and excluded; this is standard for a systematic review and would also address the missing PRISMA-style flow.
[Reference [15]] Reference [15] contains the placeholder 'accessed: [date]'; please supply the actual access date for the Dimensions.ai data used in Figure 1.
[Figure 3] The caption for Figure 3 appears, but the figure itself is not visible in the manuscript text provided; please ensure the taxonomy figure is included and legible.
[Throughout] There are several typographical and formatting inconsistencies, including 'A C OMPREHENSIVE' in the title banner and inconsistent use of 'V AEs' in Section 2; a careful copyedit would improve readability.
[Table 1] The symbols in Table 1 are explained as '✓ Comprehensive coverage, ● Partial coverage, ✗ Limited/No coverage,' but the table also uses compact notation in several cells; adding a short note defining each symbol directly below the table would remove ambiguity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the review's conclusions rest on the surveyed literature, not on the authors' own fitted parameters or self-citations.

full rationale

This paper is a systematic literature review, not a derivation, so the main circularity patterns (self-definitional equations, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, load-bearing self-citation chains, or ansatz smuggling) do not apply. The central claim—that adversarial robustness is insufficiently evaluated across deepfake detection paradigms—is an empirical synthesis of the cited studies. The only self-citation is [273] in the future-directions discussion ('image-based detectors could incorporate audio cues ... [271, 272, 273]'), which is non-load-bearing for the review's conclusions. The principal weakness is not circularity but selection bias: Section 3.1 restricts inclusion to January 2023–early 2025 with public implementations and excludes theoretical discussions without code, so the 'almost universal absence' of adversarial evaluation may overstate the field-wide state of affairs. That is a validity concern about the evidence base, not a case where the paper's conclusion is equivalent to its inputs by construction. There is no equation, parameter fit, or self-citation chain that forces the gap claim; it is a generalization from a bounded sample. Hence the circularity score is minimal.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review's conclusions depend on the reliability of the surveyed literature and on the completeness of its search. These are domain assumptions, not standard mathematical axioms. No free parameters or invented entities are present.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption The surveyed papers' reported results are accurate and representative of the state of the art.
The review draws conclusions from cited papers without independent replication or verification.
domain assumption The search strategy and inclusion criteria (Section 3.1) yield a comprehensive coverage of deepfake detection literature.
The review claims comprehensiveness based on a described search, but no PRISMA flow or counts are provided.
ad hoc to paper Excluding papers without public implementations does not bias the adversarial robustness gap assessment.
Section 3.1 excludes theoretical discussions without publicly available implementation, which may remove relevant adversarial robustness analyses.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Unmasking Synthetic Realities in Generative AI: A Comprehensive Review of Adversarially Robust Deepfake Detection Systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GBAA7IUP

@misc{pith2026250721157,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Unmasking Synthetic Realities in Generative AI: A Comprehensive Review of Adversarially Robust Deepfake Detection Systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GBAA7IUP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.21157}
}

read the original abstract

The rapid advancement of Generative Artificial Intelligence has fueled deepfake proliferation-synthetic media encompassing fully generated content and subtly edited authentic material-posing challenges to digital security, misinformation mitigation, and identity preservation. This systematic review evaluates state-of-the-art deepfake detection methodologies, emphasizing reproducible implementations for transparency and validation. We delineate two core paradigms: (1) detection of fully synthetic media leveraging statistical anomalies and hierarchical feature extraction, and (2) localization of manipulated regions within authentic content employing multi-modal cues such as visual artifacts and temporal inconsistencies. These approaches, spanning uni-modal and multi-modal frameworks, demonstrate notable precision and adaptability in controlled settings, effectively identifying manipulations through advanced learning techniques and cross-modal fusion. However, comprehensive assessment reveals insufficient evaluation of adversarial robustness across both paradigms. Current methods exhibit vulnerability to adversarial perturbations-subtle alterations designed to evade detection-undermining reliability in real-world adversarial contexts. This gap highlights critical disconnect between methodological development and evolving threat landscapes. To address this, we contribute a curated GitHub repository aggregating open-source implementations, enabling replication and testing. Our findings emphasize urgent need for future work prioritizing adversarial resilience, advocating scalable, modality-agnostic architectures capable of withstanding sophisticated manipulations. This review synthesizes strengths and shortcomings of contemporary deepfake detection while charting paths toward robust trustworthy systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.21157 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Illustration of a multi-stage pipeline in which a threat actor manipulates a source image using a text-conditional [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** The broad taxonomy of Deepfake generation and detection strategies. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

STRIKE: A Structured Taxonomy of Cybercrime for Risk, Impact, Knowledge, and Evolution
cs.CR 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

STRIKE is a proposed unified taxonomy for cybercrimes organized by attack vectors, tactics, societal impact, detection methods, and mitigation approaches.
LLM Harms: A Taxonomy and Discussion
cs.CY 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 3.0 of 10

This paper proposes a taxonomy of LLM harms in five categories and suggests mitigation strategies plus a dynamic auditing system for responsible development.
LLM Harms: A Taxonomy and Discussion
cs.CY 2025-12 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

Proposes a five-bucket taxonomy of LLM harms and calls for dynamic auditing, but the systematic review behind it is not reproducible and contains mismatched citations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

279 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

[42]

Adversarial deepfakes: Evaluating vulnerability of deepfake detectors to adversarial examples,

S. Hussain, P. Neekhara, M. Jere, F. Koushanfar, and J. McAuley, “Adversarial deepfakes: Evaluating vulnerability of deepfake detectors to adversarial examples,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF winter conference on applications of computer vision, 2021, pp. 3348–3357

2021
[257]

Robustness of ai-image detectors: Fundamental limits and practical attacks,

M. Saberi, V . S. Sadasivan, K. Rezaei, A. Kumar, A. Chegini, W. Wang, and S. Feizi, “Robustness of ai-image detectors: Fundamental limits and practical attacks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.00076, 2023

arXiv 2023
[1]

A survey of generative artificial intelligence techniques,

T. Sakirin and S. Kusuma, “A survey of generative artificial intelligence techniques,” Babylonian Journal of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2023, pp. 10–14, 2023

2023
[2]

A comprehensive survey of ai-generated content (aigc): A history of generative ai from gan to chatgpt,

Y . Cao, S. Li, Y . Liu, Z. Yan, Y . Dai, P. S. Yu, and L. Sun, “A comprehensive survey of ai-generated content (aigc): A history of generative ai from gan to chatgpt,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.04226, 2023

arXiv 2023
[3]

Leveraging generative artificial intelligence based on large language models for collaborative learning,

S. C. Tan, W. Chen, and B. L. Chua, “Leveraging generative artificial intelligence based on large language models for collaborative learning,” Learning: Research and Practice, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 125–134, 2023

2023
[4]

Collaboration with generative artificial intelligence: An exploratory study based on learning analytics,

J. Liu, S. Li, and Q. Dong, “Collaboration with generative artificial intelligence: An exploratory study based on learning analytics,” Journal of Educational Computing Research, p. 07356331241242441, 2024

2024
[5]

Constructing dreams using generative ai,

S. Ali, P. Ravi, R. Williams, D. DiPaola, and C. Breazeal, “Constructing dreams using generative ai,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 38, no. 21, 2024, pp. 23 268–23 275

2024
[6]

Generative ai: A systematic review using topic modelling techniques,

P. Gupta, B. Ding, C. Guan, and D. Ding, “Generative ai: A systematic review using topic modelling techniques,” Data and Information Management, p. 100066, 2024

2024

Show all 279 references

[7]

Research on deepfake technology and its application,

J. Bu, R.-L. Jiang, and B. Zheng, “Research on deepfake technology and its application,” Proceedings of the 2023 4th International Conference on Computing, Networks and Internet of Things, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:260204654

2023
[8]

The social impact of generative ai: An analysis on chatgpt,

M. T. Baldassarre, D. Caivano, B. Fernandez Nieto, D. Gigante, and A. Ragone, “The social impact of generative ai: An analysis on chatgpt,” in Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Information Technology for Social Good, 2023, pp. 363–373

2023
[9]

Artificial intelligence in science and society: the vision of usern,

T. Dorigo, G. D. Brown, C. Casonato, A. Cerdà, J. Ciarrochi, M. Da Lio, N. D’souza, N. R. Gauger, S. C. Hayes, S. G. Hofmann et al., “Artificial intelligence in science and society: the vision of usern,” IEEE Access, 2025

2025
[10]

Generative ai effects on school systems : An overview of generative ai with focus on chatgpt, what it is, what it isn’t and how it works

E. Simonsson, “Generative ai effects on school systems : An overview of generative ai with focus on chatgpt, what it is, what it isn’t and how it works.” p. 83, 2023

2023
[11]

Ai hype as a cyber security risk: the moral responsibility of implementing generative ai in business,

D. Humphreys, A. Koay, D. Desmond, and E. Mealy, “Ai hype as a cyber security risk: the moral responsibility of implementing generative ai in business,”AI and Ethics, pp. 1–14, 2024

2024
[12]

Generative ai in medical practice: In-depth exploration of privacy and security challenges,

Y . Chen and P. Esmaeilzadeh, “Generative ai in medical practice: In-depth exploration of privacy and security challenges,” Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 26, p. e53008, 2024

2024
[13]

Envisioning the applications and implications of generative ai for news media,

S. Nishal and N. Diakopoulos, “Envisioning the applications and implications of generative ai for news media,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.18835, 2024

2024 arXiv
[14]

Critical exploratory investigation of ai consumption, ai perception and ai literacy requirements,

D. M. Popa, “Critical exploratory investigation of ai consumption, ai perception and ai literacy requirements,” AI perception and AI literacy requirements (November 01, 2024), 2024. 14 Unmasking Synthetic Realities in the GAI Era A PREPRINT

2024
[15]

Dimensions AI - Research insights at your fingertips,

Dimensions AI, “Dimensions AI - Research insights at your fingertips,” n.d., accessed: [date]. [Online]. Available: https://www.dimensions.ai/
[16]

Beyond “bigger, faster, better

C. Whyte, “Beyond “bigger, faster, better”,” The Cyber Defense Review, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 135–150, 2023

2023
[17]

Generative adversarial nets,

I. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y . Bengio, “Generative adversarial nets,”Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 27, 2014

2014
[18]

Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,

J. Ho, A. Jain, and P. Abbeel, “Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 33, pp. 6840–6851, 2020

2020
[19]

Variational autoencoder for deep learning of images, labels and captions,

Y . Pu, Z. Gan, R. Henao, X. Yuan, C. Li, A. Stevens, and L. Carin, “Variational autoencoder for deep learning of images, labels and captions,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 29, 2016

2016
[20]

Text-image guided diffusion model for generating deepfake celebrity interactions,

Y . Chen, N. A. H. Haldar, N. Akhtar, and A. Mian, “Text-image guided diffusion model for generating deepfake celebrity interactions,”2023 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA), pp. 348–355, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://...

2023
[21]

Conditional generative adversarial nets,

M. Mirza, “Conditional generative adversarial nets,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.1784, 2014

2014 arXiv
[22]

Image de-raining using a conditional generative adversarial network,

H. Zhang, V . Sindagi, and V . M. Patel, “Image de-raining using a conditional generative adversarial network,” IEEE transactions on circuits and systems for video technology, vol. 30, no. 11, pp. 3943–3956, 2019

2019
[23]

Generative adversarial text to image synthesis,

S. Reed, Z. Akata, X. Yan, L. Logeswaran, B. Schiele, and H. Lee, “Generative adversarial text to image synthesis,” in International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2016, pp. 1060–1069

2016
[24]

Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models,

L. Zhang, A. Rao, and M. Agrawala, “Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2023, pp. 3836–3847

2023
[25]

Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language under- standing,

C. Saharia, W. Chan, S. Saxena, L. Li, J. Whang, E. L. Denton, K. Ghasemipour, R. Gontijo Lopes, B. Karagol Ayan, T. Salimanset al., “Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language under- standing,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 35, ...

2022
[26]

Dreamfusion: Text-to-3d using 2d diffusion,

B. Poole, A. Jain, J. T. Barron, and B. Mildenhall, “Dreamfusion: Text-to-3d using 2d diffusion,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14988, 2022

2022 arXiv
[27]

Zero-shot text-to-image generation,

A. Ramesh, M. Pavlov, G. Goh, S. Gray, C. V oss, A. Radford, M. Chen, and I. Sutskever, “Zero-shot text-to-image generation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.12092, 2021

2021 arXiv
[28]

Video diffusion models,

J. Ho, W. Chan, C. Saharia, J. Whang, R. Gao, A. Gritsenko, D. P. Kingma, B. Poole, M. Norouzi, D. J. Fleet et al., “Video diffusion models,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.03458, 2022

2022 arXiv
[29]

Sok: Facial deepfake detectors,

B. M. Le, J. Kim, S. Tariq, K. Moore, A. Abuadbba, and S. S. Woo, “Sok: Facial deepfake detectors,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.04364, 2024

2024 arXiv
[30]

Deepfake video detection: challenges and opportunities,

A. Kaur, A. N. Hoshyar, V . Saikrishna, S. Firmin, and F. Xia, “Deepfake video detection: challenges and opportunities,” Artif. Intell. Rev. , vol. 57, p. 159, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:270127933

2024
[31]

Audio deepfake detection: A survey,

J. Yi, C. Wang, J. Tao, X. Zhang, C. Y . Zhang, and Y . Zhao, “Audio deepfake detection: A survey,”ArXiv, vol. abs/2308.14970, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:261276979

2023 arXiv
[32]

A survey on speech deepfake detection,

M. Li, Y . Ahmadiadli, and X.-P. Zhang, “A survey on speech deepfake detection,”ACM Computing Surveys, 2025

2025
[33]

Fake news detection using deep learning: A systematic literature review,

M. Q. Alnabhan and P. Branco, “Fake news detection using deep learning: A systematic literature review,”IEEE Access, 2024

2024
[34]

Advances in deepfake detection algorithms: Exploring fusion techniques in single and multi-modal approach,

A. Kumar, D. Singh, R. Jain, D. K. Jain, C. Gan, and X. Zhao, “Advances in deepfake detection algorithms: Exploring fusion techniques in single and multi-modal approach,” Information Fusion, p. 102993, 2025

2025
[35]

Evolving from single-modal to multi-modal facial deepfake detection: A survey,

P. Liu, Q. Tao, and J. T. Zhou, “Evolving from single-modal to multi-modal facial deepfake detection: A survey,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2406.06965, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:270379957

2024 arXiv
[36]

Wavenet: A generative model for raw audio,

A. v. d. Oord, S. Dieleman, H. Zen, K. Simonyan, O. Vinyals, A. Graves, N. Kalchbrenner, A. Senior, and K. Kavukcuoglu, “Wavenet: A generative model for raw audio,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.03499, 2016

2016 arXiv
[37]

Tacotron: Towards end-to-end speech synthesis,

Y . Wang, R. Skerry-Ryan, D. Stanton, Y . Wu, R. J. Weiss, N. Jaitly, Z. Yang, Y . Xiao, Z. Chen, Q. V . Leet al., “Tacotron: Towards end-to-end speech synthesis,” inInterspeech 2017, 2017, pp. 4006–4010

2017
[38]

Language models are unsupervised multitask learners,

A. Radford, J. Wu, R. Child, D. Luan, D. Amodei, and I. Sutskever, “Language models are unsupervised multitask learners,” OpenAI blog, vol. 1, no. 8, p. 9, 2019

2019
[39]

The emergence of deepfake technology: A review,

M. Westerlund, “The emergence of deepfake technology: A review,”Technology Innovation Management Review, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 39–52, 2019. 15 Unmasking Synthetic Realities in the GAI Era A PREPRINT

2019
[40]

Cnn-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for now,

S.-Y . Wang, O. Wang, R. Zhang, A. Owens, and A. A. Efros, “Cnn-generated images are surprisingly easy to spot... for now,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2020, pp. 8695–8704

2020
[41]

Diffusion models for image synthesis: A comprehensive survey,

F. Wang, W. Liu, D. Chen, J. Wu, Z. Ye, S. Shenet al., “Diffusion models for image synthesis: A comprehensive survey,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.06825, 2023

2023 arXiv
[43]

Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models

E. J. Hu, Y . Shen, P. Wallis, Z. Allen-Zhu, Y . Li, S. Wang, L. Wang, W. Chenet al., “Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models.” ICLR, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 3, 2022

2022
[44]

Deepfakes and beyond: A survey of face manipulation and fake detection,

R. Tolosana, R. Vera-Rodriguez, J. Fierrez, A. Morales, and J. Ortega-Garcia, “Deepfakes and beyond: A survey of face manipulation and fake detection,” Information Fusion, vol. 64, pp. 131–148, 2020

2020
[45]

Leveraging frequency analysis for deep fake image recognition,

J. Frank, T. Eisenhofer, L. Schönherr, A. Fischer, D. Kolossa, and T. Holz, “Leveraging frequency analysis for deep fake image recognition,” in International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2020, pp. 3247–3258

2020
[46]

Recurrent convolutional strategies for face manipulation detection in videos,

E. Sabir, J. Cheng, A. Jaiswal, W. AbdAlmageed, I. Masi, and P. Natarajan, “Recurrent convolutional strategies for face manipulation detection in videos,” Interfaces (GUI), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 80–87, 2019

2019
[47]

Bot or human? detection of deepfake text with semantic, emoji, sentiment and linguistic features,

A. T. Y . Chong, H. N. Chua, M. B. Jasser, and R. T. K. Wong, “Bot or human? detection of deepfake text with semantic, emoji, sentiment and linguistic features,” 2023 IEEE 13th International Conference on System Engineering and Technology (ICSET) , pp. 205–210, 2023. [Online]....

2023
[48]

Fakecatcher: Detection of synthetic portrait videos using biological signals,

U. A. Ciftci, I. Demir, and L. Yin, “Fakecatcher: Detection of synthetic portrait videos using biological signals,” IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 2020

2020
[49]

Detecting deep-fake videos from phoneme-viseme mis- matches,

S. Agarwal, H. Farid, O. Fried, and M. Agrawala, “Detecting deep-fake videos from phoneme-viseme mis- matches,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops, 2020, pp. 660–661

2020
[50]

Frequency-aware discriminative feature learning supervised by single-center loss for face forgery detection,

J. Li, H. Xie, J. Li, Z. Wang, and Y . Zhang, “Frequency-aware discriminative feature learning supervised by single-center loss for face forgery detection,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2021, pp. 6458–6467

2021
[51]

Explainable deep-fake detection using visual interpretability methods,

B. Malolan, A. Parekh, and F. Kazi, “Explainable deep-fake detection using visual interpretability methods,” in 2020 3rd International conference on Information and Computer Technologies (ICICT). IEEE, 2020, pp. 289–293

2020
[52]

Fakespotter: A simple yet robust baseline for spotting ai-synthesized fake faces,

R. Wang, F. Juefei-Xu, L. Ma, X. Xie, Y . Huang, J. Wang, and Y . Liu, “Fakespotter: A simple yet robust baseline for spotting ai-synthesized fake faces,” in International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/C...

2019
[53]

Learning on gradients: Generalized artifacts representation for gan-generated images detection,

C. Tan, Y . Zhao, S. Wei, G. Gu, and Y . Wei, “Learning on gradients: Generalized artifacts representation for gan-generated images detection,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023, pp. 12 105–12 114

2023
[54]

Frequency-aware deepfake detection: Improving generaliz- ability through frequency space learning,

C. Tan, Y . Zhao, S. Wei, G. Gu, P. Liu, and Y . Wei, “Frequency-aware deepfake detection: Improving generaliz- ability through frequency space learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.07240, 2024

2024 arXiv
[55]

Frepgan: Robust deepfake detection using frequency- level perturbations,

Y . Jeong, D. Kim, Y . Ro, and J. Choi, “Frepgan: Robust deepfake detection using frequency- level perturbations,” in AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , 2022. [Online]. Available: https: //api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:246634415

2022
[56]

Frequency masking for universal deepfake detection,

C. T. Doloriel and N.-M. Cheung, “Frequency masking for universal deepfake detection,” inICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) . IEEE, 2024, pp. 13 466–13 470

2024
[57]

On the exploitation of dct-traces in the generative-ai domain,

O. Pontorno, L. Guarnera, and S. Battiato, “On the exploitation of dct-traces in the generative-ai domain,” in 2024 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). IEEE, 2024, pp. 3806–3812

2024
[58]

Frequency-aware attentional feature fusion for deepfake detection,

C. Tian, Z. Luo, G. Shi, and S. Li, “Frequency-aware attentional feature fusion for deepfake detection,” in ICASSP 2023-2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) . IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–5

2023
[59]

Detection of diffusion model-generated faces by assessing smoothness and noise tolerance,

B. Liu, B. Liu, M. Ding, and T. Zhu, “Detection of diffusion model-generated faces by assessing smoothness and noise tolerance,” in 2024 IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting (BMSB). IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–6. 16 Unmasking Synthetic Realities ...

2024
[60]

Towards the detection of ai-synthesized human face images,

Y . Lu and T. Ebrahimi, “Towards the detection of ai-synthesized human face images,” in2024 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP). IEEE, 2024, pp. 3778–3784

2024
[62]

Wavelet-driven generalizable framework for deepfake face forgery detection,

L. B. Baru, R. Boddeda, S. A. Patel, and S. M. Gajapaka, “Wavelet-driven generalizable framework for deepfake face forgery detection,” in Proceedings of the winter conference on applications of computer vision, 2025, pp. 1661–1669

2025
[63]

Towards universal fake image detectors that generalize across generative models,

U. Ojha, Y . Li, and Y . J. Lee, “Towards universal fake image detectors that generalize across generative models,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023, pp. 24 480–24 489

2023
[64]

Towards extensible detection of ai-generated images via content-agnostic adapter-based category-aware incremental learning,

S. Tang, P. He, H. Li, W. Wang, X. Jiang, and Y . Zhao, “Towards extensible detection of ai-generated images via content-agnostic adapter-based category-aware incremental learning,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2025

2025
[65]

Forgery-aware adaptive transformer for generalizable synthetic image detection,

H. Liu, Z. Tan, C. Tan, Y . Wei, J. Wang, and Y . Zhao, “Forgery-aware adaptive transformer for generalizable synthetic image detection,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 10 770–10 780

2024
[66]

Recent advances on generalizable diffusion-generated image detection,

Q. Xu, D. Chen, J. Chen, S. Lyu, and C. Wang, “Recent advances on generalizable diffusion-generated image detection,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.19716, 2025

2025 arXiv
[67]

Faster than lies: Real- time deepfake detection using binary neural networks,

R. Lanzino, F. Fontana, A. Diko, M. R. Marini, and L. Cinque, “Faster than lies: Real- time deepfake detection using binary neural networks,” 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) , pp. 3771–3780, 2024. [Online]. Available: https...

2024
[68]

Distildire: A small, fast, cheap and lightweight diffusion synthesized deepfake detection,

Y . Lim, C. Lee, A. Kim, and O. Etzioni, “Distildire: A small, fast, cheap and lightweight diffusion synthesized deepfake detection,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2406.00856, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:270210472

2024 arXiv
[69]

Sepmark: Deep separable watermarking for unified source tracing and deepfake detection,

X. Wu, X. Liao, and B. Ou, “Sepmark: Deep separable watermarking for unified source tracing and deepfake detection,” Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:258588430

2023
[70]

Ai-assisted deepfake detection using adaptive blind image watermarking,

L.-Y . Hsu, “Ai-assisted deepfake detection using adaptive blind image watermarking,”J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent., vol. 100, p. 104094, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:267907143

2024
[71]

{PTW}: Pivotal tuning watermarking for {Pre-Trained} image generators,

N. Lukas and F. Kerschbaum, “{PTW}: Pivotal tuning watermarking for {Pre-Trained} image generators,” in 32nd USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 23), 2023, pp. 2241–2258

2023
[72]

Lampmark: Proactive deepfake detection via training- free landmark perceptual watermarks,

T. Wang, M. Huang, H. Cheng, X. Zhang, and Z. Shen, “Lampmark: Proactive deepfake detection via training- free landmark perceptual watermarks,” inProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2024, pp. 10 515–10 524

2024
[73]

Scalable universal adversarial watermark defending against facial forgery,

T. Qiao, B. Zhao, R. Shi, M. Han, M. Hassaballah, F. Retraint, and X. Luo, “Scalable universal adversarial watermark defending against facial forgery,”IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2024

2024
[74]

An adversarial attack approach for explainable ai evaluation on deepfake detection models,

B. Gowrisankar and V . L. Thing, “An adversarial attack approach for explainable ai evaluation on deepfake detection models,” Computers & Security, vol. 139, p. 103684, 2024

2024
[75]

Deepfeaturex net: Deep features extractors based network for discriminating synthetic from real images,

O. Pontorno, L. Guarnera, and S. Battiato, “Deepfeaturex net: Deep features extractors based network for discriminating synthetic from real images,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2404.15697, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:269330225

2024 arXiv
[76]

Interpretable-through-prototypes deepfake detection for diffusion models,

A. Aghasanli, D. Kangin, and P. P. Angelov, “Interpretable-through-prototypes deepfake detection for diffusion models,” 2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW), pp. 467–474,

2023
[77]

Data-independent operator: A training-free artifact representation extractor for generalizable deepfake detection,

C. Tan, P. Liu, R. Tao, H. Liu, Y . Zhao, B. Wu, and Y . Wei, “Data-independent operator: A training-free artifact representation extractor for generalizable deepfake detection,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2403.06803, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:268363480

2024 arXiv
[78]

Rethinking the up-sampling operations in cnn-based generative network for generalizable deepfake detection,

C. Tan, Y . Zhao, S. Wei, G. Gu, P. Liu, and Y . Wei, “Rethinking the up-sampling operations in cnn-based generative network for generalizable deepfake detection,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 28 130–28 139

2024
[79]

Dire for diffusion-generated image detection,

Z. Wang, J. Bao, W. Zhou, W. Wang, H. Hu, H. Chen, and H. Li, “Dire for diffusion-generated image detection,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2023, pp. 22 445–22 455. 17 Unmasking Synthetic Realities in the GAI Era A PREPRINT

2023
[80]

Mastering deepfake detection: A cutting-edge approach to distinguish gan and diffusion-model images,

L. Guarnera, O. Giudice, and S. Battiato, “Mastering deepfake detection: A cutting-edge approach to distinguish gan and diffusion-model images,” ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.or...

2024
[81]

Adaptive meta-learning for robust deepfake detection: A multi-agent framework to data drift and model generalization,

B. N. Subudhi et al., “Adaptive meta-learning for robust deepfake detection: A multi-agent framework to data drift and model generalization,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.08148, 2024

2024 arXiv
[82]

An analysis of recent advances in deepfake image detection in an evolving threat landscape,

S. M. Abdullah, A. Cheruvu, S. Kanchi, T. Chung, P. Gao, M. Jadliwala, and B. Viswanath, “An analysis of recent advances in deepfake image detection in an evolving threat landscape,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.16212, 2024

2024 arXiv
[83]

Masked conditional diffusion model for enhancing deepfake detection,

T. Chen, S. Yang, S. Hu, Z. Fang, Y . Fu, X. Wu, and X. Wang, “Masked conditional diffusion model for enhancing deepfake detection,” in 2024 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–7

2024
[84]

Optimized frequency collaborative strategy drives ai image detection,

J. Li, W. Jiang, L. Shen, and Y . Ren, “Optimized frequency collaborative strategy drives ai image detection,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 2025

2025
[85]

Frequency masking for universal deepfake detection,

C. T. C. Doloriel and N.-M. Cheung, “Frequency masking for universal deepfake detection,” ICASSP 2024 - 2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 13 466–13 470,

2024
[86]

On the exploitation of dct-traces in the generative-ai domain,

O. Pontorno, L. Guarnera, and S. Battiato, “On the exploitation of dct-traces in the generative-ai domain,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2402.02209, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:267411952

2024 arXiv
[87]

Towards the detection of ai-synthesized human face images,

Y . Lu and T. Ebrahimi, “Towards the detection of ai-synthesized human face images,”ArXiv, vol. abs/2402.08750,

arXiv
[88]

Deepfake detection without deepfakes: Generalization via synthetic frequency patterns injection,

D. A. Coccomini, R. Caldelli, C. Gennaro, G. Fiameni, G. Amato, and F. Falchi, “Deepfake detection without deepfakes: Generalization via synthetic frequency patterns injection,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2403.13479, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:268537294

2024 arXiv
[89]

Detection of diffusion model-generated faces by assessing smoothness and noise tolerance,

B. Liu, B. Liu, M. Ding, and T. Zhu, “Detection of diffusion model-generated faces by assessing smoothness and noise tolerance,” 2024 IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting (BMSB), pp. 1–6, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semantics...

2024
[90]

Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:267657939

[Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:267657939
[91]

Herd mentality in augmentation–not a good idea! a robust multi-stage approach towards deepfake detection,

R. R. Dhanakshirur et al., “Herd mentality in augmentation–not a good idea! a robust multi-stage approach towards deepfake detection,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.05466, 2024

2024 arXiv
[92]

Face forgery detection by 3d decomposition and composition search,

X. Zhu, H. Fei, B. Zhang, T. Zhang, X. Zhang, S. Z. Li, and Z. Lei, “Face forgery detection by 3d decomposition and composition search,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 8342–8357, 2023

2023
[93]

Breaking semantic artifacts for generalized ai-generated image detection,

C. Zheng, C. Lin, Z. Zhao, H. Wang, X. Guo, S. Liu, and C. Shen, “Breaking semantic artifacts for generalized ai-generated image detection,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 37, pp. 59 570–59 596, 2025

2025
[94]

Preserving fairness generalization in deepfake detection,

L. Lin, X. He, Y . Ju, X. Wang, F. Ding, and S. Hu, “Preserving fairness generalization in deepfake detection,” 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 16 815–16 825, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:268031845

2024
[95]

Using graph neural networks to improve generalization capability of the models for deepfake detection,

H. She, Y . Hu, B. Liu, J. Li, and C.-T. Li, “Using graph neural networks to improve generalization capability of the models for deepfake detection,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2024

2024
[96]

Rlgc: Reconstruction learning fusing gradient and content features for efficient deepfake detection,

K. Xu, X. Hu, X. Zhou, X. Xu, L. Qi, and C. Chen, “Rlgc: Reconstruction learning fusing gradient and content features for efficient deepfake detection,” IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, 2024

2024
[97]

Detecting and recovering sequential deepfake manipulation,

R. Shao, T. Wu, and Z. Liu, “Detecting and recovering sequential deepfake manipulation,” inEuropean Confer- ence on Computer Vision. Springer, 2022, pp. 712–728

2022
[98]

Samif: Adapting segment anything model for image inpainting forensics,

L. Zhang, X. Zhu, D. He, X. Liao, and B. Sun, “Samif: Adapting segment anything model for image inpainting forensics,” in Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Computer Vision, 2024, pp. 3605–3621

2024
[99]

Laa-net: Localized artifact attention network for quality-agnostic and generalizable deepfake detection,

D. Nguyen, N. Mejri, I. P. Singh, P. Kuleshova, M. Astrid, A. Kacem, E. Ghorbel, and D. Aouada, “Laa-net: Localized artifact attention network for quality-agnostic and generalizable deepfake detection,” 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)...

2024
[100]

Temporal diversified self-contrastive learning for generalized face forgery detection,

R. Zhang, P. He, H. Li, S. Wang, and Y . Cao, “Temporal diversified self-contrastive learning for generalized face forgery detection,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2024. 18 Unmasking Synthetic Realities in the GAI Era A PREPRINT

2024
[101]

A quality-centric framework for generic deepfake detection,

W. Song, Z. Yan, Y . Lin, T. Yao, C. Chen, S. Chen, Y . Zhao, S. Ding, and B. Li, “A quality-centric framework for generic deepfake detection,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.05335, 2024

2024 arXiv
[102]

Face forgery detection by 3d decomposition,

X. Zhu, H. Wang, H. Fei, Z. Lei, and S. Z. Li, “Face forgery detection by 3d decomposition,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2021, pp. 2929–2939

2021
[103]

Enhanced deepfake detection using frequency domain upsampling,

M. D. Bah and M. Dahmane, “Enhanced deepfake detection using frequency domain upsampling,” in VISIGRAPP : VISAPP, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:268236242

2024
[104]

Exposing lip-syncing deepfakes from mouth inconsistencies,

S. K. Datta, S. Jia, and S. Lyu, “Exposing lip-syncing deepfakes from mouth inconsistencies,” 2024 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME) , pp. 1–6, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:267035087

2024
[105]

Fsbi: Deepfake detection with frequency enhanced self-blended images,

A. A. Hasanaath, H. Luqman, R. Katib, and S. Anwar, “Fsbi: Deepfake detection with frequency enhanced self-blended images,” Image and Vision Computing, p. 105418, 2025

2025
[106]

Robust sequential deepfake detection,

R. Shao, T. Wu, and Z. Liu, “Robust sequential deepfake detection,”International Journal of Computer Vision, pp. 1–18, 2025

2025
[107]

Demamba: Ai-generated video detection on million-scale genvideo benchmark,

H. Chen, Y . Hong, Z. Huang, Z. Xu, Z. Gu, Y . Li, J. Lan, H. Zhu, J. Zhang, W. Wang et al., “Demamba: Ai-generated video detection on million-scale genvideo benchmark,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.19707, 2024

2024 arXiv
[108]

Learning spatiotemporal inconsistency via thumbnail layout for face deepfake detection,

Y . Xu, J. Liang, L. Sheng, and X.-Y . Zhang, “Learning spatiotemporal inconsistency via thumbnail layout for face deepfake detection,” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 132, no. 12, pp. 5663–5680, 2024

2024
[109]

Masked relation learning for deepfake detection,

Z. Yang, J. Liang, Y . Xu, X.-Y . Zhang, and R. He, “Masked relation learning for deepfake detection,”IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 18, pp. 1696–1708, 2023

2023
[110]

Grdt: Towards robust deepfake detection using geometric representation distribution and texture,

H. Xie, H. He, B. Fu, and V . Sanchez, “Grdt: Towards robust deepfake detection using geometric representation distribution and texture,” in Proceedings of the Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, 2025, pp. 734–744

2025
[111]

Lip feature disentanglement for visual speaker authentication in natural scenes,

Y . He, L. Yang, S. Wang, and A. W.-C. Liew, “Lip feature disentanglement for visual speaker authentication in natural scenes,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2024

2024
[112]

Exposing the deception: Uncovering more forgery clues for deepfake detection,

Z. Ba, Q. Liu, Z. Liu, S. Wu, F. Lin, L. Lu, and K. Ren, “Exposing the deception: Uncovering more forgery clues for deepfake detection,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 38, no. 2, 2024, pp. 719–728

2024
[113]

Marlin: Masked autoencoder for facial video representation learning,

Z. Cai, S. Ghosh, K. Stefanov, A. Dhall, J. Cai, H. Rezatofighi, R. Haffari, and M. Hayat, “Marlin: Masked autoencoder for facial video representation learning,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2023, pp. 1493–1504

2023
[114]

Contrastive pseudo learning for open-world deepfake attribution,

Z. Sun, S. Chen, T. Yao, B. Yin, R. Yi, S. Ding, and L. Ma, “Contrastive pseudo learning for open-world deepfake attribution,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2023, pp. 20 882–20 892

2023
[115]

Implicit identity leakage: The stumbling block to improving deepfake detection generalization,

S. Dong, J. Wang, R. Ji, J. Liang, H. Fan, and Z. Ge, “Implicit identity leakage: The stumbling block to improving deepfake detection generalization,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023, pp. 3994–4004

2023
[116]

Open-set deepfake detection: A parameter-efficient adaptation method with forgery style mixture,

C. Kong, A. Luo, P. Bao, H. Li, R. Wan, Z. Zheng, A. Rocha, and A. C. Kot, “Open-set deepfake detection: A parameter-efficient adaptation method with forgery style mixture,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.12791, 2024

2024
[117]

Seeable: Soft discrepancies and bounded contrastive learning for exposing deepfakes,

N. Larue, N.-S. Vu, V . Struc, P. Peer, and V . Christophides, “Seeable: Soft discrepancies and bounded contrastive learning for exposing deepfakes,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2023, pp. 21 011–21 021

2023
[118]

Deepfidelity: Perceptual forgery fidelity assessment for deepfake detection,

C. Peng, H. Guo, D. Liu, N. Wang, R. Hu, and X. Gao, “Deepfidelity: Perceptual forgery fidelity assessment for deepfake detection,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.04961, 2023

2023 arXiv
[119]

Deepfake-adapter: Dual-level adapter for deepfake detection,

R. Shao, T. Wu, L. Nie, and Z. Liu, “Deepfake-adapter: Dual-level adapter for deepfake detection,”International Journal of Computer Vision, pp. 1–16, 2025

2025
[120]

C2p-clip: Injecting category common prompt in clip to enhance generalization in deepfake detection,

C. Tan, R. Tao, H. Liu, G. Gu, B. Wu, Y . Zhao, and Y . Wei, “C2p-clip: Injecting category common prompt in clip to enhance generalization in deepfake detection,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2408.09647, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:271903069

2024 arXiv
[121]

Improving the perturbation-based explanation of deepfake detectors through the use of adversarially-generated samples,

K. Tsigos, E. Apostolidis, and V . Mezaris, “Improving the perturbation-based explanation of deepfake detectors through the use of adversarially-generated samples,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.03957, 2025. 19 Unmasking Synthetic Realities in the GAI Era A PREPRINT

2025 arXiv
[122]

Improved deepfake video detection using convolutional vision transformer,

D. Wodajo, P. Lambert, G. V . Wallendael, S. Atnafu, and H. Mareen, “Improved deepfake video detection using convolutional vision transformer,”2024 IEEE Gaming, Entertainment, and Media Conference (GEM), pp. 1–6,

2024
[123]

Robust face forgery detection integrating local texture and global texture information,

R. Gong, R. He, D. Zhang, A. K. Sangaiah, and M. J. Alenazi, “Robust face forgery detection integrating local texture and global texture information,” EURASIP Journal on Information Security, vol. 2025, no. 1, p. 3, 2025

2025
[124]

Enhanced deepfake detection with densenet and cross-vit,

F. Siddiqui, J. Yang, S. Xiao, and M. Fahad, “Enhanced deepfake detection with densenet and cross-vit,”Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 267, p. 126150, 2025

2025
[125]

Unmasking deepfake faces from videos using an explainable cost-sensitive deep learning approach,

F. Mahmud, Y . Abdullah, M. Islam, and T. Aziz, “Unmasking deepfake faces from videos using an explainable cost-sensitive deep learning approach,” in2023 26th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–6

2023
[126]

Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:271115309

[Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:271115309
[127]

Deepfake detection using spatiotemporal transformer,

B. Kaddar, S. A. Fezza, Z. Akhtar, W. Hamidouche, A. Hadid, and J. Serra-Sagristà, “Deepfake detection using spatiotemporal transformer,” ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 1–21, 2024

2024
[128]

Region-based optimization in continual learning for audio deepfake detection,

Y . Chen, J. Yi, C. Fan, J. Tao, Y . Ren, S. Zeng, C. Y . Zhang, X. Yan, H. Gu, J. Xue et al., “Region-based optimization in continual learning for audio deepfake detection,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.11551, 2024

2024 arXiv
[129]

Bts-e: Audio deepfake detection using breathing-talking- silence encoder,

T.-P. Doan, L. Nguyen-Vu, S. Jung, and K. Hong, “Bts-e: Audio deepfake detection using breathing-talking- silence encoder,” in ICASSP 2023-2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–5

2023
[130]

Does audio deepfake detection rely on artifacts?

T.-H. Shih, C.-Y . Yeh, and M.-S. Chen, “Does audio deepfake detection rely on artifacts?”ICASSP 2024 - 2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 12 446–12 450, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusI...

2024
[131]

What to remember: Self-adaptive continual learning for audio deepfake detection,

X. Zhang, J. Yi, C. Wang, C. Zhang, S. Zeng, and J. Tao, “What to remember: Self-adaptive continual learning for audio deepfake detection,” in AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:266335673

2023
[132]

Rawbmamba: End-to-end bidirectional state space model for audio deepfake detection,

Y . Chen, J. Yi, J. Xue, C. Wang, X. Zhang, S. Dong, S. Zeng, J. Tao, Z. Lv, and C. Fan, “Rawbmamba: End-to-end bidirectional state space model for audio deepfake detection,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2406.06086, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:270371253

2024 arXiv
[133]

Sonics: Synthetic or not - identifying counterfeit songs,

M. A. Rahman, Z. I. A. Hakim, N. H. Sarker, B. Paul, and S. A. Fattah, “Sonics: Synthetic or not - identifying counterfeit songs,” in International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2025

2025
[134]

Source tracing of audio deepfake systems,

N. Klein, T. Chen, H. Tak, R. Casal, and E. Khoury, “Source tracing of audio deepfake systems,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.08016, 2024

2024 arXiv
[135]

Hm-conformer: A conformer-based audio deepfake detection system with hierarchical pooling and multi-level classification token aggregation methods,

H.-S. Shin, J.-S. Heo, J. ho Kim, C. Lim, W. Kim, and H.-J. Yu, “Hm-conformer: A conformer-based audio deepfake detection system with hierarchical pooling and multi-level classification token aggregation methods,” ICASSP 2024 - 2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, ...

2024
[136]

Slim: Style-linguistics mismatch model for generalized audio deepfake detection,

Y . Zhu, S. Koppisetti, T. Tran, and G. Bharaj, “Slim: Style-linguistics mismatch model for generalized audio deepfake detection,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 37, pp. 67 901–67 928, 2025

2025
[137]

Audio deepfake detection with self-supervised xls-r and sls classifier,

Q. Zhang, S. Wen, and T. Hu, “Audio deepfake detection with self-supervised xls-r and sls classifier,” in Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2024, pp. 6765–6773

2024
[138]

Domain generalization via aggregation and separation for audio deepfake detection,

Y . Xie, H. Cheng, Y . Wang, and L. Ye, “Domain generalization via aggregation and separation for audio deepfake detection,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 19, pp. 344–358, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:264190166

2024
[139]

A robust audio deepfake detection system via multi-view feature,

Y . Yang, H. Qin, H. Zhou, C. Wang, T. Guo, K. Han, and Y . Wang, “A robust audio deepfake detection system via multi-view feature,” in ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2024, pp. 13 131–13 135

2024
[140]

Clad: Robust audio deepfake detection against manipulation attacks with contrastive learning,

H. Wu, J. Chen, R. Du, C. Wu, K. He, X. Shang, H. Ren, and G. Xu, “Clad: Robust audio deepfake detection against manipulation attacks with contrastive learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.15854, 2024. 20 Unmasking Synthetic Realities in the GAI Era A PREPRINT

2024 arXiv
[141]

Cross-domain audio deepfake detection: Dataset and analysis,

Y . Li, M. Zhang, M. Ren, M. Ma, D. Wei, and H. Yang, “Cross-domain audio deepfake detection: Dataset and analysis,” in Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:269004806

2024
[142]

Prompt tuning for audio deepfake detection: Compu- tationally efficient test-time domain adaptation with limited target dataset,

H. Oiso, Y . Matsunaga, K. Kakizaki, and T. Miyagawa, “Prompt tuning for audio deepfake detection: Compu- tationally efficient test-time domain adaptation with limited target dataset,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.09869, 2024

2024 arXiv
[143]

Dual-channel deepfake audio detection: Leveraging direct and reverberant waveforms,

G. Lee, J. Lee, M. Jung, J. Lee, K. Hong, S. Jung, and Y . Han, “Dual-channel deepfake audio detection: Leveraging direct and reverberant waveforms,” IEEE Access , vol. 13, pp. 18 040–18 052, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:275836837

2025
[144]

Abc-capsnet: Attention based cascaded capsule network for audio deepfake detection,

T. M. Wani, R. Gulzar, and I. Amerini, “Abc-capsnet: Attention based cascaded capsule network for audio deepfake detection,” 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), pp. 2464–2472, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticsch...

2024
[145]

Wavlm model ensemble for audio deepfake detection,

D. Combei, A. Stan, D. Oneata, and H. Cucu, “Wavlm model ensemble for audio deepfake detection,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.07414, 2024

2024 arXiv
[146]

Does current deepfake audio detection model effectively detect alm-based deepfake audio?

Y . Xie, C. Xiong, X. Wang, Z. Wang, Y . Lu, X. Qi, R. Fu, Y . Liu, Z. Wen, J. Taoet al., “Does current deepfake audio detection model effectively detect alm-based deepfake audio?” in2024 IEEE 14th International Symposium on Chinese Spoken Language Processing (ISCSLP). IEEE, 2...

2024
[147]

Safeear: Content privacy-preserving audio deepfake detection,

X. Li, K. Li, Y . Zheng, C. Yan, X. Ji, and W. Xu, “Safeear: Content privacy-preserving audio deepfake detection,” in Conference on Computer and Communications Security , 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:272689640

2024
[148]

Spectral clustering-guided news environments perception for fake news detection,

K. Wang, Y . Yang, and X. Wang, “Spectral clustering-guided news environments perception for fake news detection,” IEEE Access, 2024

2024
[149]

Topformer: Topology-aware authorship attribution of deepfake texts with diverse writing styles,

A. Uchendu, T. Le, and D. Lee, “Topformer: Topology-aware authorship attribution of deepfake texts with diverse writing styles,” in European Conference on Artificial Intelligence , 2023. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:262216942

2023
[150]

Mc-dnn: Fake news detection using multi-channel deep neural networks,

J. V . Tembhurne, M. M. Almin, and T. Diwan, “Mc-dnn: Fake news detection using multi-channel deep neural networks,” International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2022

2022
[151]

Detection on early dynamic rumor influence and propagation using biogeography-based optimization with deep learning approaches,

R. Amutha, “Detection on early dynamic rumor influence and propagation using biogeography-based optimization with deep learning approaches,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, pp. 1–18, 2024

2024
[152]

MAGE: Machine-generated text detection in the wild,

Y . Li, Q. Li, L. Cui, W. Bi, Z. Wang, L. Wang, L. Yang, S. Shi, and Y . Zhang, “MAGE: Machine-generated text detection in the wild,” in Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , L.-W. Ku, A. Martins, and ...

2024
[153]

Deepfake text detection: Limitations and opportunities,

J. Pu, Z. Sarwar, S. M. Abdullah, A. Rehman, Y . Kim, P. Bhattacharya, M. Javed, and B. Viswanath, “Deepfake text detection: Limitations and opportunities,” in Proc. of IEEE S&P, 2023

2023
[154]

Enhancing machine-generated text detection: Adversarial fine-tuning of pre-trained language models,

D. H. Lee and B. Jang, “Enhancing machine-generated text detection: Adversarial fine-tuning of pre-trained language models,” IEEE Access, 2024

2024
[155]

Bertguard: Two-tiered multi-domain fake news detection with class imbalance mitigation,

M. Q. Alnabhan and P. Branco, “Bertguard: Two-tiered multi-domain fake news detection with class imbalance mitigation,” Big Data and Cognitive Computing, vol. 8, no. 8, p. 93, 2024

2024
[156]

Joint audio-visual deepfake detection,

Y . Zhou and S.-N. Lim, “Joint audio-visual deepfake detection,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2021, pp. 14 800–14 809

2021
[157]

Lips are lying: Spotting the temporal inconsistency between audio and visual in lip-syncing deepfakes,

W. Liu, T. She, J. Liu, B. Li, D. Yao, Z. Liang, and R. Wang, “Lips are lying: Spotting the temporal inconsistency between audio and visual in lip-syncing deepfakes,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, A. Globerson, L. Mackey, D. Belgrave, A. Fan, U. Paquet,...

2024
[158]

Ctrsvdd: A benchmark dataset and baseline analysis for controlled singing voice deepfake detection,

Y . Zang, J. Shi, Y . Zhang, R. Yamamoto, J. Han, Y . Tang, S. Xu, W. Zhao, J. Guo, T. Toda, and Z. Duan, “Ctrsvdd: A benchmark dataset and baseline analysis for controlled singing voice deepfake detection,” in Interspeech 2024, 2024, pp. 4783–4787

2024
[159]

Tandem spoofing-robust automatic speaker verification based on time-domain embeddings,

A. Weizman, Y . Ben-Shimol, and I. Lapidot, “Tandem spoofing-robust automatic speaker verification based on time-domain embeddings,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.17133, 2024

2024 arXiv
[160]

Antifakeprompt: Prompt-tuned vision-language models are fake image detectors,

Y .-M. Chang, C. Yeh, W.-C. Chiu, and N. Yu, “Antifakeprompt: Prompt-tuned vision-language models are fake image detectors,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2310.17419, 2023. [Online]. Available: https: //api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:264490490

2023 arXiv
[161]

On learning multi-modal forgery representation for diffusion generated video detection,

X. Song, X. Guo, J. Zhang, Q. Li, L. Bai, X. Liu, G. Zhai, and X. Liu, “On learning multi-modal forgery representation for diffusion generated video detection,” inProceeding of Thirty-eighth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Vancouver, Canada, December 2024

2024
[162]

Av-lip-sync+: Leveraging av-hubert to exploit multimodal inconsistency for video deepfake detection,

S. A. Shahzad, A. Hashmi, Y .-T. Peng, Y . Tsao, and H.-M. Wang, “Av-lip-sync+: Leveraging av-hubert to exploit multimodal inconsistency for video deepfake detection,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2311.02733, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:265033179

2023
[163]

Robust clip-based detector for exposing diffusion model-generated images,

Santosh, L. Lin, I. Amerini, X. Wang, and S. Hu, “Robust clip-based detector for exposing diffusion model-generated images,” 2024 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS), pp. 1–7, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticschol...

2024
[164]

Common sense reasoning for deep fake detection,

Y . Zhang, B. Colman, A. Shahriyari, and G. Bharaj, “Common sense reasoning for deep fake detection,”ArXiv, vol. abs/2402.00126, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:267365533

2024 arXiv
[165]

Gm-df: Generalized multi-scenario deepfake detection,

Y . Lai, Z. Yu, J. Yang, B. Li, X. Kang, and L. Shen, “Gm-df: Generalized multi-scenario deepfake detection,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.20078, 2024

2024 arXiv
[166]

Conditioned prompt-optimization for continual deepfake detection,

F. Laiti, B. Liberatori, T. D. Min, and E. Ricci, “Conditioned prompt-optimization for continual deepfake detection,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2407.21554, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID: 271571467

2024 arXiv
[167]

Fakebench: Probing explainable fake image detection via large multimodal models,

Y . Li, X. Liu, X. Wang, B. S. Lee, S. Wang, A. Rocha, and W. Lin, “Fakebench: Probing explainable fake image detection via large multimodal models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.13306, 2024

2024 arXiv
[168]

Clipping the deception: Adapting vision-language models for universal deepfake detection,

S. A. Khan and D.-T. Dang-Nguyen, “Clipping the deception: Adapting vision-language models for universal deepfake detection,” Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:267759986

2024
[169]

De-fake: Detection and attribution of fake images generated by text-to-image generation models,

Z. Sha, Z. Li, N. Yu, and Y . Zhang, “De-fake: Detection and attribution of fake images generated by text-to-image generation models,” in Proceedings of the 2023 ACM SIGSAC conference on computer and communications security, 2023, pp. 3418–3432

2023
[170]

A hitchhiker’s guide to fine-grained face forgery detection using common sense reasoning,

N. M. Foteinopoulou, E. Ghorbel, and D. Aouada, “A hitchhiker’s guide to fine-grained face forgery detection using common sense reasoning,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 37, pp. 2943–2976, 2024

2024
[171]

Detecting and grounding multi-modal media manipulation,

R. Shao, T. Wu, and Z. Liu, “Detecting and grounding multi-modal media manipulation,” 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 6904–6913, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:257952257

2023
[172]

Feature integration-based residual deep learning model for fake news detection using multimodal data sources,

M. N. Shah and A. Ganatra, “Feature integration-based residual deep learning model for fake news detection using multimodal data sources,” in 2024 2nd International Conference on Self Sustainable Artificial Intelligence Systems (ICSSAS). IEEE, 2024, pp. 345–353

2024
[173]

Bi-lora: A vision-language approach for synthetic image detection,

M. Keita, W. Hamidouche, H. Bougueffa Eutamene, A. Taleb-Ahmed, D. Camacho, and A. Hadid, “Bi-lora: A vision-language approach for synthetic image detection,” Expert Systems, vol. 42, no. 2, p. e13829, 2025

2025
[174]

Raising the Bar of AI-generated Image Detection with CLIP,

D. Cozzolino, G. Poggi, R. Corvi, M. Nießner, and L. Verdoliva, “Raising the Bar of AI-generated Image Detection with CLIP,” in IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), 2024

2024
[175]

Can chatgpt detect deepfakes? a study of using multimodal large language models for media forensics,

S. Jia, R. Lyu, K. Zhao, Y . Chen, Z. Yan, Y . Ju, C. Hu, X. Li, B. Wu, and S. Lyu, “Can chatgpt detect deepfakes? a study of using multimodal large language models for media forensics,” 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), pp....

2024
[176]

Speechforensics: Audio-visual speech representation learning for face forgery detection,

Y . Liang, M. Yu, G. Li, J. Jiang, B. Li, F. Yu, N. Zhang, X. Meng, and W. Huang, “Speechforensics: Audio-visual speech representation learning for face forgery detection,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 37, pp. 86 124–86 144, 2024

2024
[177]

Self-supervised video forensics by audio-visual anomaly detection,

C. Feng, Z. Chen, and A. Owens, “Self-supervised video forensics by audio-visual anomaly detection,” 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 10 491–10 503, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:255416023

2023
[178]

Harnessing the power of large vision language models for synthetic image detection,

M. Keita, W. Hamidouche, H. Bougueffa, A. Hadid, and A. Taleb-Ahmed, “Harnessing the power of large vision language models for synthetic image detection,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.02726, 2024

2024 arXiv
[179]

Cross-modality and within-modality regularization for audio-visual deepfake detection,

H. Zou, M. Shen, Y . Hu, C. Chen, E. S. Chng, and D. Rajan, “Cross-modality and within-modality regularization for audio-visual deepfake detection,” in ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2024, pp. 4900–4904

2024
[180]

Dimodif: Discourse modality-information differentiation for audio-visual deepfake detection and localization,

C. Koutlis and S. Papadopoulos, “Dimodif: Discourse modality-information differentiation for audio-visual deepfake detection and localization,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.10193, 2024

2024 arXiv
[181]

Zero-shot fake video detection by audio-visual consistency,

X. Li, Z. Liu, C. Chen, L. Li, L. Guo, and D. Wang, “Zero-shot fake video detection by audio-visual consistency,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.07854, 2024

2024 arXiv
[182]

Joint audio-visual attention with contrastive learning for more general deepfake detection,

Y . Zhang, W. Lin, and J. Xu, “Joint audio-visual attention with contrastive learning for more general deepfake detection,” ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications and Applications, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 1–23, 2024. 22 Unmasking Synthetic Realities in the GAI Er...

2024
[183]

Audio-visual person-of-interest deepfake detection,

D. Cozzolino, M. Nießner, and L. Verdoliva, “Audio-visual person-of-interest deepfake detection,” 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW), pp. 943–952, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:248006166

2023
[184]

Triple-modality interaction for deepfake detection on zero-shot identity,

J. Yoon, A. Panizo-LLedot, D. Camacho, and C. Choi, “Triple-modality interaction for deepfake detection on zero-shot identity,”Information Fusion, vol. 109, p. 102424, 2024

2024
[185]

Avsecure: An audio-visual watermarking framework for proactive deepfake detection,

B. Guo, H. Tai, G. Luo, and Y . Zhu, “Avsecure: An audio-visual watermarking framework for proactive deepfake detection,” 2024 IEEE 14th International Conference on Electronics Information and Emergency Communication (ICEIEC), pp. 1–4, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.se...

2024
[186]

Unveiling the power of audio-visual early fusion transformers with dense interactions through masked modeling,

S. Mo and P. Morgado, “Unveiling the power of audio-visual early fusion transformers with dense interactions through masked modeling,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 27 186–27 196

2024
[187]

Audio multi-view spoofing detection framework based on audio-text-emotion correlations,

J. Wu, Q. Yin, Z. Sheng, W. Lu, J. Huang, and B. Li, “Audio multi-view spoofing detection framework based on audio-text-emotion correlations,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2024

2024
[188]

Mis-avoidd: Modality invariant and specific representation for audio-visual deepfake detection,

V . S. Katamneni and A. Rattani, “Mis-avoidd: Modality invariant and specific representation for audio-visual deepfake detection,” 2023 International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA) , pp. 1371–1378, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar...

2023
[189]

Development of a multimodal framework for deepfake detection: combining visual and audio analysis,

A. A. Bekheet, G. Khoriba, and A. S. Ghoneim, “Development of a multimodal framework for deepfake detection: combining visual and audio analysis,” in Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Sciences (EECSS 2024), 2024

2024
[190]

Df-transfusion: Multimodal deepfake detection via lip-audio cross- attention and facial self-attention,

A. Kharel, M. Paranjape, and A. Bera, “Df-transfusion: Multimodal deepfake detection via lip-audio cross- attention and facial self-attention,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.06511, 2023

2023 arXiv
[191]

Avff: Audio-visual feature fusion for video deepfake detection,

T. Oorloff, S. Koppisetti, N. Bonettini, D. Solanki, B. Colman, Y . Yacoob, A. Shahriyari, and G. Bharaj, “Avff: Audio-visual feature fusion for video deepfake detection,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 27 102–27 112

2024
[192]

A multi-stream fusion approach with one-class learning for audio-visual deepfake detection,

K. Lee, Y . Zhang, and Z. Duarr, “A multi-stream fusion approach with one-class learning for audio-visual deepfake detection,” in 2024 IEEE 26th International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP) . IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–6

2024
[193]

Mcl: Multimodal contrastive learning for deepfake detection,

X. Liu, Y . Yu, X. Li, and Y . Zhao, “Mcl: Multimodal contrastive learning for deepfake detection,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 34, pp. 2803–2813, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:261629550

2024
[194]

Avoid-df: Audio-visual joint learning for detecting deepfake,

W. Yang, X. Zhou, Z. Chen, B. Guo, Z. Ba, Z. Xia, X. Cao, and K. Ren, “Avoid-df: Audio-visual joint learning for detecting deepfake,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 18, pp. 2015–2029,

2015
[195]

Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:257797706

[Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:257797706
[196]

Avt2-dwf: Improving deepfake detection with audio-visual fusion and dynamic weighting strategies,

R. Wang, D. Ye, L. Tang, Y . Zhang, and J. Deng, “Avt2-dwf: Improving deepfake detection with audio-visual fusion and dynamic weighting strategies,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, vol. 31, pp. 1960–1964, 2024

1960
[197]

Altfreezing for more general video face forgery detection,

Z. Wang, J. Bao, W. Zhou, W. Wang, and H. Li, “Altfreezing for more general video face forgery detection,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2023, pp. 4129–4138

2023
[198]

Dynamic graph learning with content- guided spatial-frequency relation reasoning for deepfake detection,

Y . Wang, K. Yu, C. Chen, X. Hu, and S. Peng, “Dynamic graph learning with content- guided spatial-frequency relation reasoning for deepfake detection,” 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pp. 7278–7287, 2023. [Online]. Available: https...

2023
[199]

Pudd: towards robust multi-modal prototype-based deepfake detection,

A. L. Pellicer, Y . Li, and P. Angelov, “Pudd: towards robust multi-modal prototype-based deepfake detection,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2024, pp. 3809–3817

2024
[200]

Circumventing shortcuts in audio-visual deepfake detection datasets with unsupervised learning,

S. Smeu, D.-A. Boldisor, D. Oneata, and E. Oneata, “Circumventing shortcuts in audio-visual deepfake detection datasets with unsupervised learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.00175, 2024

2024 arXiv
[201]

Detecting deepfakes without seeing any,

T. Reiss, B. Cavia, and Y . Hoshen, “Detecting deepfakes without seeing any,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.01458, 2023

2023 arXiv
[202]

Trufor: Leveraging all-round clues for trustworthy image forgery detection and localization,

F. Guillaro, D. Cozzolino, A. Sud, N. Dufour, and L. Verdoliva, “Trufor: Leveraging all-round clues for trustworthy image forgery detection and localization,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2023, pp. 20 606–20 615

2023
[203]

Image manipulation detection and localization using multi-scale contrastive learning,

R. Bai, “Image manipulation detection and localization using multi-scale contrastive learning,” Applied Soft Computing, p. 111914, 2024

2024
[204]

3d data augmentation and dual-branch model for robust face forgery detection,

C. Zhou, F. W. Li, C. Song, D. Zheng, and B. Yang, “3d data augmentation and dual-branch model for robust face forgery detection,” Graphical Models, vol. 138, p. 101255, 2025

2025
[205]

Vulnerability-aware spatio-temporal learning for generalizable and interpretable deepfake video detection,

D. Nguyen, M. Astrid, A. Kacem, E. Ghorbel, and D. Aouada, “Vulnerability-aware spatio-temporal learning for generalizable and interpretable deepfake video detection,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.01184, 2025

2025 arXiv
[206]

Where deepfakes gaze at? spatial-temporal gaze inconsistency analysis for video face forgery detection,

C. Peng, Z. Miao, D. Liu, N. Wang, R. Hu, and X. Gao, “Where deepfakes gaze at? spatial-temporal gaze inconsistency analysis for video face forgery detection,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2024

2024
[207]

Hierarchical fine-grained image forgery detection and localization,

X. Guo, X. Liu, Z. Ren, S. Grosz, I. Masi, and X. Liu, “Hierarchical fine-grained image forgery detection and localization,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2023, pp. 3155–3165

2023
[208]

Iml-vit: Benchmarking image manipulation localization by vision transformer,

X. Ma, B. Du, Z. Jiang, A. Y . A. Hammadi, and J. Zhou, “Iml-vit: Benchmarking image manipulation localization by vision transformer,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.14863, 2023

2023 arXiv
[209]

Exploring multi-modal fusion for image manipulation detection and localization,

K. Triaridis and V . Mezaris, “Exploring multi-modal fusion for image manipulation detection and localization,” in Proc. 30th Int. Conf. on MultiMedia Modeling (MMM 2024), Jan.-Feb. 2024

2024
[210]

A noise and edge extraction-based dual-branch method for shallowfake and deepfake localization,

D. Dagar and D. K. Vishwakarma, “A noise and edge extraction-based dual-branch method for shallowfake and deepfake localization,” Signal, Image and Video Processing, vol. 19, no. 3, p. 198, 2025

2025
[211]

Is jpeg ai going to change image forensics?

E. D. Cannas, S. Mandelli, N. Popovic, A. Alkhateeb, A. Gnutti, P. Bestagini, and S. Tubaro, “Is jpeg ai going to change image forensics?” arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.03261, 2024

2024 arXiv
[212]

Exploring multi-view pixel contrast for general and robust image forgery localization,

Z. Lou, G. Cao, K. Guo, L. Yu, and S. Weng, “Exploring multi-view pixel contrast for general and robust image forgery localization,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2025

2025
[213]

Weakly-supervised deepfake localization in diffusion-generated images,

D.-C. Tantaru, E. Oneata, and D. Oneata, “Weakly-supervised deepfake localization in diffusion-generated images,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, 2024, pp. 6258–6268

2024
[214]

Can we get rid of handcrafted feature extractors? sparsevit: Nonsemantics-centered, parameter-efficient image manipulation localization through spare-coding transformer,

L. Su, X. Ma, X. Zhu, C. Niu, Z. Lei, and J.-Z. Zhou, “Can we get rid of handcrafted feature extractors? sparsevit: Nonsemantics-centered, parameter-efficient image manipulation localization through spare-coding transformer,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.14598, 2024

2024 arXiv
[215]

A lightweight and effective image tampering localization network with vision mamba,

K. Guo, G. Cao, Z. Lou, X. Huang, and J. Liu, “A lightweight and effective image tampering localization network with vision mamba,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.09941, 2025

2025 arXiv
[216]

Learning discriminative noise guidance for image forgery detection and localization,

J. Zhu, D. Li, X. Fu, G. Yang, J. Huang, A. Liu, and Z.-J. Zha, “Learning discriminative noise guidance for image forgery detection and localization,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , vol. 38, no. 7, 2024, pp. 7739–7747

2024
[217]

Omniguard: Hybrid manipulation localization via augmented versatile deep image watermarking,

X. Zhang, Z. Tang, Z. Xu, R. Li, Y . song Xu, B. Chen, F. Gao, and J. Zhang, “Omniguard: Hybrid manipulation localization via augmented versatile deep image watermarking,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2412.01615, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:274436548

2024 arXiv
[218]

Pim-net: Progressive inconsistency mining network for image manipulation localization,

N. Bai, X. Wang, R. Han, J. Hou, Y . Wang, and S. Pang, “Pim-net: Progressive inconsistency mining network for image manipulation localization,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 159, p. 111136, 2025

2025
[219]

Localization of diffusion model-based inpainting through the inter-intra similarity of frequency features,

S.-L. Lee, M. Kang, and J.-U. Hou, “Localization of diffusion model-based inpainting through the inter-intra similarity of frequency features,” Image and Vision Computing, p. 105138, 2024

2024
[220]

Dense feature interaction network for image inpainting localization,

Y . Yao, T. Han, S. Jia, and S. Lyu, “Dense feature interaction network for image inpainting localization,”IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2025

2025
[221]

Editguard: Versatile image watermarking for tamper localization and copyright protection,

X. Zhang, R. Li, J. Yu, Y . song Xu, W. Li, and J. Zhang, “Editguard: Versatile image watermarking for tamper localization and copyright protection,” 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 11 964–11 974, 2023. [Online]. Available: https...

2024
[222]

Objectformer for image manipulation detection and localization,

J. Wang, Z. Wu, J. Chen, X. Han, A. Shrivastava, S.-N. Lim, and Y .-G. Jiang, “Objectformer for image manipulation detection and localization,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022, pp. 2364–2373

2022
[223]

Fakeshield: Explainable image forgery detection and localization via multi-modal large language models,

Z. Xu, X. Zhang, R. Li, Z. Tang, Q. Huang, and J. Zhang, “Fakeshield: Explainable image forgery detection and localization via multi-modal large language models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.02761, 2024

2024 arXiv
[224]

Hdf-net: Capturing homogeny difference features to localize the tampered image,

R. Han, X. Wang, N. Bai, Y . Wang, J. Hou, and J. Xue, “Hdf-net: Capturing homogeny difference features to localize the tampered image,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2024. 24 Unmasking Synthetic Realities in the GAI Era A PREPRINT

2024
[225]

Pre-training-free image manipulation localization through non-mutually exclusive contrastive learning,

J. Zhou, X. Ma, X. Du, A. Y . A. Hammadi, and W. Feng, “Pre-training-free image manipulation localization through non-mutually exclusive contrastive learning,”2023 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , pp. 22 289–22 299, 2023. [Online]. Available: https...

2023
[226]

Declip: Decoding clip representations for deepfake localization,

S. Smeu, E. Oneata, and D. Oneata, “Declip: Decoding clip representations for deepfake localization,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2025

2025
[227]

Towards modern image manipulation localization: A large-scale dataset and novel methods,

C. Qu, Y . Zhong, C. Liu, G. Xu, D. Peng, F. Guo, and L. Jin, “Towards modern image manipulation localization: A large-scale dataset and novel methods,”2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 10 781–10 790, 2024. [Online]. Available: htt...

2024
[228]

Mesoscopic insights: Orchestrating multi-scale & hybrid architecture for image manipulation localization,

X. Zhu, X. Ma, L. Su, Z. Jiang, B. Du, X. Wang, Z. Lei, W. Feng, C.-M. Pun, and J. Zhou, “Mesoscopic insights: Orchestrating multi-scale & hybrid architecture for image manipulation localization,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.13753, 2024

2024 arXiv
[229]

Noise-assisted prompt learning for image forgery detection and localization,

D. Li, J. Zhu, X. Fu, X. Guo, Y . Liu, G. Yang, J. Liu, and Z.-J. Zha, “Noise-assisted prompt learning for image forgery detection and localization,” in European Conference on Computer Vision, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:274024057

2024
[230]

Toward real text manipulation detection: New dataset and new solution,

D. Luo, Y . Liu, R. Yang, X. Liu, J. Zeng, Y . Zhou, and X. Bai, “Toward real text manipulation detection: New dataset and new solution,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 157, p. 110828, 2025

2025
[231]

Ffaa: Multimodal large language model based explainable open-world face forgery analysis assistant,

Z. Huang, B. Xia, Z. Lin, Z. Mou, W. Yang, and J. Jia, “Ffaa: Multimodal large language model based explainable open-world face forgery analysis assistant,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.10072, 2024

2024 arXiv
[232]

Localization and detection of deepfake videos based on self-blending method,

J. Xu, X. Liu, W. Lin, W. Shang, and Y . Wang, “Localization and detection of deepfake videos based on self-blending method,” Scientific Reports , vol. 15, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:276058766

2025
[233]

Detect any deepfakes: Segment anything meets face forgery detection and localization,

Y . Lai, Z. Luo, and Z. Yu, “Detect any deepfakes: Segment anything meets face forgery detection and localization,” in Chinese Conference on Biometric Recognition. Springer, 2023, pp. 180–190

2023
[234]

Istvt: interpretable spatial-temporal video transformer for deepfake detection,

C. Zhao, C. Wang, G. Hu, H. Chen, C. Liu, and J. Tang, “Istvt: interpretable spatial-temporal video transformer for deepfake detection,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, vol. 18, pp. 1335–1348, 2023

2023
[235]

Spatio-temporal co-attention fusion network for video splicing localization,

M. Lin, G. Cao, Z. Lou, and C. Zhang, “Spatio-temporal co-attention fusion network for video splicing localization,” Journal of Electronic Imaging, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 033 027–033 027, 2024

2024
[236]

Delocate: Detection and localization for deepfake videos with randomly-located tampered traces,

J. Hu, X. Liao, D. Gao, S. Tsutsui, Q. Wang, Z. Qin, and M. Z. Shou, “Delocate: Detection and localization for deepfake videos with randomly-located tampered traces,” in International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semantics...

2024
[237]

Vane-bench: Video anomaly evaluation benchmark for conversational lmms,

R. K. Bharadwaj, H. Gani, M. Naseer, F. S. Khan, and S. H. Khan, “Vane-bench: Video anomaly evaluation benchmark for conversational lmms,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2406.10326, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:270559848

2024 arXiv
[238]

Glitch in the matrix: A large scale benchmark for content driven audio–visual forgery detection and localization,

Z. Cai, S. Ghosh, A. Dhall, T. Gedeon, K. Stefanov, and M. Hayat, “Glitch in the matrix: A large scale benchmark for content driven audio–visual forgery detection and localization,” Computer Vision and Image Understanding, vol. 236, p. 103818, 2023. 25 Unmasking Synthetic Real...

2023
[239]

Undercover deepfakes: detecting fake segments in videos,

S. Saha, R. Perera, S. Seneviratne, T. Malepathirana, S. Rasnayaka, D. Geethika, T. Sim, and S. Halgamuge, “Undercover deepfakes: detecting fake segments in videos,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2023, pp. 415–425

2023
[240]

Locate and verify: A two-stream network for improved deepfake detection,

C. Shuai, J. Zhong, S. Wu, F. Lin, Z. Wang, Z. Ba, Z. Liu, L. Cavallaro, and K. Ren, “Locate and verify: A two-stream network for improved deepfake detection,”Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticsch...

2023
[241]

Www: Where, which and whatever enhancing interpretability in multimodal deepfake detection,

J. Jung, S. Lee, J. Kang, and Y . Na, “Www: Where, which and whatever enhancing interpretability in multimodal deepfake detection,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2408.02954, 2024. [Online]. Available: https: //api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:271720087

2024 arXiv
[242]

Multi-modal deepfake detection using attention-based fusion framework,

——, “Multi-modal deepfake detection using attention-based fusion framework,” in The IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB). IEEE, 2024

2024
[243]

V2a-mark: Versatile deep visual-audio watermarking for manipulation localization and copyright protection,

X. Zhang, Y . song Xu, R. Li, J. Yu, W. Li, Z. Xu, and J. Zhang, “V2a-mark: Versatile deep visual-audio watermarking for manipulation localization and copyright protection,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2404.16824, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:269362565

2024 arXiv
[244]

1m-deepfakes detection challenge,

Z. Cai, A. Dhall, S. Ghosh, M. Hayat, D. Kollias, K. Stefanov, and U. Tariq, “1m-deepfakes detection challenge,” in Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2024, pp. 11 355–11 359

2024
[245]

Av-deepfake1m: A large- scale llm-driven audio-visual deepfake dataset,

Z. Cai, S. Ghosh, A. P. Adatia, M. Hayat, A. Dhall, T. Gedeon, and K. Stefanov, “Av-deepfake1m: A large- scale llm-driven audio-visual deepfake dataset,” inProceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2024, pp. 7414–7423

2024
[246]

Contextual cross-modal attention for audio-visual deepfake detection and localization,

V . S. Katamneni and A. Rattani, “Contextual cross-modal attention for audio-visual deepfake detection and localization,” 2024 IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics (IJCB) , pp. 1–11, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:271710159

2024
[247]

Llamapartialspoof: An llm-driven fake speech dataset simulating disinformation generation,

H.-T. Luong, H. Li, L. Zhang, K. A. Lee, and E. S. Chng, “Llamapartialspoof: An llm-driven fake speech dataset simulating disinformation generation,” in ICASSP 2025-2025 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2025, pp. 1–5

2025
[248]

Proactive detection of voice cloning with localized watermarking,

R. S. Roman, P. Fernandez, A. Défossez, T. Furon, T. Tran, and H. Elsahar, “Proactive detection of voice cloning with localized watermarking,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.17264, 2024

2024 arXiv
[249]

Ummaformer: A universal multimodal-adaptive transformer framework for temporal forgery localization,

R. Zhang, H. Wang, M. Du, H. Liu, Y . Zhou, and Q. Zeng, “Ummaformer: A universal multimodal-adaptive transformer framework for temporal forgery localization,” in Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2023, pp. 8749–8759

2023
[250]

Adversarial training and gradient optimization for partially deepfake audio localization,

S. Zeng, J. Yi, J. Tao, J. He, Z. Lian, S. Liang, C. Zhang, Y . Chen, and X. Zhang, “Adversarial training and gradient optimization for partially deepfake audio localization,” in ICASSP 2025 - 2025 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASS...

2025
[251]

Coarse-to-fine proposal refinement framework for audio temporal forgery detection and localization,

J. Wu, W. Lu, X. Luo, R. Yang, Q. Wang, and X. Cao, “Coarse-to-fine proposal refinement framework for audio temporal forgery detection and localization,” in Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2024, pp. 7395–7403

2024
[252]

Adversarial attack against images classification based on generative adversarial networks,

Y . Yang, “Adversarial attack against images classification based on generative adversarial networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.16662, 2024

2024 arXiv
[253]

Advshadow: Evading deepfake detection via adversarial shadow attack,

J. Liu, M. Zhang, J. Ke, and L. Wang, “Advshadow: Evading deepfake detection via adversarial shadow attack,” in ICASSP 2024-2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2024, pp. 4640–4644

2024
[254]

Hfmf: Hierarchical fusion meets multi-stream models for deepfake detection,

A. Mehta, B. McArthur, N. Kolloju, and Z. Tu, “Hfmf: Hierarchical fusion meets multi-stream models for deepfake detection,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.05631, 2025

2025 arXiv
[255]

Multi-spectral class center network for face manipulation detection and localization,

C. Miao, Q. Chu, Z. Tan, Z. Jin, T. Gong, W. Zhuang, Y . Wu, B. Liu, H. Hu, and N. Yu, “Multi-spectral class center network for face manipulation detection and localization,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10794, 2023

2023 arXiv
[256]

Evading deepfake detectors via adversarial statistical consistency,

Y . Hou, Q. Guo, Y . Huang, X. Xie, L. Ma, and J. Zhao, “Evading deepfake detectors via adversarial statistical consistency,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2023, pp. 12 271–12 280

2023
[258]

2d-malafide: Adversarial attacks against face deepfake detection systems,

C. Galdi, M. Panariello, M. Todisco, and N. Evans, “2d-malafide: Adversarial attacks against face deepfake detection systems,” in 2024 International Conference of the Biometrics Special Interest Group (BIOSIG). IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–7. 26 Unmasking Synthetic Realities in the GAI E...

2024
[259]

Imperceptible adversarial attack via invertible neural networks,

Z. Chen, Z. Wang, J.-j. Huang, W. Zhao, X. Liu, and D. Guan, “Imperceptible adversarial attack via invertible neural networks,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , vol. 37, no. 1, 2023, pp. 414–424

2023
[260]

Towards quantitative evaluation of explainable ai methods for deepfake detection,

K. Tsigos, E. Apostolidis, S. Baxevanakis, S. Papadopoulos, and V . Mezaris, “Towards quantitative evaluation of explainable ai methods for deepfake detection,” inProceedings of the 3rd ACM international workshop on multimedia AI against disinformation, 2024, pp. 37–45

2024
[261]

Adversarial magnification to deceive deepfake detection through super resolution,

D. A. Coccomini, R. Caldelli, G. Amato, F. Falchi, and C. Gennaro, “Adversarial magnification to deceive deepfake detection through super resolution,” inJoint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Springer, 2023, pp. 491–501

2023
[262]

Diffam: Diffusion-based adversarial makeup transfer for facial privacy protection,

Y . Sun, L. Yu, H. Xie, J. Li, and Y . Zhang, “Diffam: Diffusion-based adversarial makeup transfer for facial privacy protection,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2024, pp. 24 584–24 594

2024
[263]

Efficient generation of targeted and transferable adversarial examples for vision-language models via diffusion models,

Q. Guo, S. Pang, X. Jia, Y . Liu, and Q. Guo, “Efficient generation of targeted and transferable adversarial examples for vision-language models via diffusion models,” IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 2024

2024
[264]

Vulnerabilities in ai-generated image detection: The challenge of adversarial attacks,

Y . Diao, N. Zhai, C. Miao, X. Yang, and M. Wang, “Vulnerabilities in ai-generated image detection: The challenge of adversarial attacks,” ArXiv, vol. abs/2407.20836, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:271544461

2024
[265]

Ava: Inconspicuous attribute variation-based adversarial attack bypassing deepfake detection,

X. Meng, L. Wang, S. Guo, L. Ju, and Q. Zhao, “Ava: Inconspicuous attribute variation-based adversarial attack bypassing deepfake detection,” in 2024 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP). IEEE, 2024, pp. 74–90

2024
[266]

Stealthdiffusion: Towards evading diffusion forensic detection through diffusion model,

Z. Zhou, K. Sun, Z. Chen, H. Kuang, X. Sun, and R. Ji, “Stealthdiffusion: Towards evading diffusion forensic detection through diffusion model,” in Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, 2024, pp. 3627–3636

2024
[267]

Unmarker: A universal attack on defensive image watermarking,

A. Kassis and U. Hengartner, “Unmarker: A universal attack on defensive image watermarking,” in2025 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), vol. 2, no. 6, 2025, p. 8

2025
[268]

Are watermarks bugs for deepfake detectors? rethinking proactive forensics,

X. Wu, X. Liao, B. Ou, Y . Liu, and Z. Qin, “Are watermarks bugs for deepfake detectors? rethinking proactive forensics,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.17867, 2024

2024 arXiv
[269]

Diffprotect: Generate adversarial examples with diffusion models for facial privacy protection,

J. Liu, C. P. Lau, and R. Chellappa, “Diffprotect: Generate adversarial examples with diffusion models for facial privacy protection,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13625, 2023

2023
[270]

Unlocking the potential of adaptive attacks on diffusion-based purification,

A. Kassis, U. Hengartner, and Y . Yu, “Unlocking the potential of adaptive attacks on diffusion-based purification,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.16598, 2024

2024
[271]

Robust deepfake detection by addressing generalization and trustworthiness challenges: A short survey,

P. Liu, Q. Tao, and J. Zhou, “Robust deepfake detection by addressing generalization and trustworthiness challenges: A short survey,” inProceedings of the 1st ACM Multimedia Workshop on Multi-modal Misinformation Governance in the Era of Foundation Models, 2024, pp. 3–11

2024
[272]

Extending multi-modal contrastive representations,

Z. Zhang, Z. Wang, L. Liu, R. Huang, X. Cheng, Z. Ye, H. Liu, H. Huang, Y . Zhao, T. Jinet al., “Extending multi-modal contrastive representations,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 37, pp. 91 880–91 903, 2024

2024
[273]

Capsfake: A multimodal capsule network for detecting instruction-guided deepfakes,

T. Nguyen, N. Khan, and I. Khalil, “Capsfake: A multimodal capsule network for detecting instruction-guided deepfakes,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.19212, 2025

2025 arXiv
[274]

Defense against adversarial attacks on audio deepfake detection,

P. Kawa, M. Plata, and P. Syga, “Defense against adversarial attacks on audio deepfake detection,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.14597, 2022

2022 arXiv
[275]

Transferable adversarial attacks on audio deepfake detection,

M. U. Farooq, A. Khan, K. Uddin, and K. M. Malik, “Transferable adversarial attacks on audio deepfake detection,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.11902, 2025

2025 arXiv
[276]

Connecting multi-modal contrastive representations,

Z. Wang, Y . Zhao, H. Huang, J. Liu, A. Yin, L. Tang, L. Li, Y . Wang, Z. Zhang, and Z. Zhao, “Connecting multi-modal contrastive representations,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , vol. 36, pp. 22 099–22 114, 2023

2023
[279]

Mixtures of experts for audio-visual learning,

Y . Cheng, Y . Li, J. He, and R. Feng, “Mixtures of experts for audio-visual learning,” inAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, A. Globerson, L. Mackey, D. Belgrave, A. Fan, U. Paquet, J. Tomczak, and C. Zhang, Eds., vol. 37. Curran Associates, Inc., 2024, pp. 219...

2024
[280]

Xai-based detection of adversarial attacks on deepfake detectors,

B. Pinhasov, R. Lapid, R. Ohayon, M. Sipper, and Y . Aperstein, “Xai-based detection of adversarial attacks on deepfake detectors,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.02955, 2024. 27

2024 arXiv
[2023]

Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:263771394

[Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:263771394
[2024]

Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:266977102

[Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:266977102

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [42]

Adversarial deepfakes: Evaluating vulnerability of deepfake detectors to adversarial examples,

S. Hussain, P. Neekhara, M. Jere, F. Koushanfar, and J. McAuley, “Adversarial deepfakes: Evaluating vulnerability of deepfake detectors to adversarial examples,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF winter conference on applications of computer vision, 2021, pp. 3348–3357

2021

[2] [257]

Robustness of ai-image detectors: Fundamental limits and practical attacks,

M. Saberi, V . S. Sadasivan, K. Rezaei, A. Kumar, A. Chegini, W. Wang, and S. Feizi, “Robustness of ai-image detectors: Fundamental limits and practical attacks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.00076, 2023

arXiv 2023

[3] [1]

A survey of generative artificial intelligence techniques,

T. Sakirin and S. Kusuma, “A survey of generative artificial intelligence techniques,” Babylonian Journal of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2023, pp. 10–14, 2023

2023

[4] [2]

A comprehensive survey of ai-generated content (aigc): A history of generative ai from gan to chatgpt,

Y . Cao, S. Li, Y . Liu, Z. Yan, Y . Dai, P. S. Yu, and L. Sun, “A comprehensive survey of ai-generated content (aigc): A history of generative ai from gan to chatgpt,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.04226, 2023

arXiv 2023

[5] [3]

Leveraging generative artificial intelligence based on large language models for collaborative learning,

S. C. Tan, W. Chen, and B. L. Chua, “Leveraging generative artificial intelligence based on large language models for collaborative learning,” Learning: Research and Practice, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 125–134, 2023

2023

[6] [4]

Collaboration with generative artificial intelligence: An exploratory study based on learning analytics,

J. Liu, S. Li, and Q. Dong, “Collaboration with generative artificial intelligence: An exploratory study based on learning analytics,” Journal of Educational Computing Research, p. 07356331241242441, 2024

2024

[7] [5]

Constructing dreams using generative ai,

S. Ali, P. Ravi, R. Williams, D. DiPaola, and C. Breazeal, “Constructing dreams using generative ai,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 38, no. 21, 2024, pp. 23 268–23 275

2024

[8] [6]

Generative ai: A systematic review using topic modelling techniques,

P. Gupta, B. Ding, C. Guan, and D. Ding, “Generative ai: A systematic review using topic modelling techniques,” Data and Information Management, p. 100066, 2024

2024